Skip to comments.
Palin: No 'problem' with gay group at CPAC
The Hill ^
| 10 Feb 2011
| Michael O'Brien
Posted on 02/10/2011 6:25:57 AM PST by Notary Sojac
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 501-511 next last
To: trisham
I have certainly never seen anything to make me think otherwise.
381
posted on
02/10/2011 1:35:34 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: wagglebee
HappyWarrior2011, HappyWarrior2010, HappyWarrior2009...
382
posted on
02/10/2011 1:37:47 PM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: MEGoody
"However, participation in CPAC is a form of "speech". You DO support freedom of speech, right? "
This has NOTHING to do with freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is a limitation on the government from curtailing speech. Private individuals and groups can organize boycotts of organizations who promote a message they are opposed to. That is not a violation of free speech and neither is opposing CPAC's decision to deviate from their original mission statement by providing a forum for groups than are opposed to any of the legs of traditional conservatism. It would only be a free speech issue if that opposition included insisting that the government step in and limit who CPAC could have speak.
383
posted on
02/10/2011 1:38:01 PM PST
by
rob777
To: j.argese; indylindy
No, she isn’t. You, however, are a rude promoter of the homosexual agenda.
384
posted on
02/10/2011 1:41:28 PM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Immerito
Nonsense. What about Harry Potter?
385
posted on
02/10/2011 1:42:47 PM PST
by
altura
To: MEGoody
You aren’t “sharing your views”. You are stirring the pot.
386
posted on
02/10/2011 1:42:52 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: rob777
Private individuals and groups can organize boycotts of organizations who promote a message they are opposed to.Then feel free to boycott CPAC if you disagree wiht what they are doing. :::shrug:::
387
posted on
02/10/2011 1:43:48 PM PST
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: kroll
Did you check the info? There is now a muslim on the board of CPAC and other “interesting” ties.
388
posted on
02/10/2011 1:44:02 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: TribalPrincess2U
Would you like mandatory Catholic laws? We had mandatory "Christian" laws -- ones based on the Bible for most of the nation's history and that is what made this a great nation:
"Christianity is part of the common law"
[Sources: James Wilson, Course of Lectures [vol 3, p.122]; and quoted in Updegraph v. The Commonwealth, 11 Serg, & R. 393, 403 (1824).
"I verily believe Christianity necessary to the support of civil society. One of the beautiful boasts of our municipal jurisprudence is that Christianity is a part of the Common Law. . . There never has been a period in which the Common Law did not recognize Christianity as lying its foundations."
[Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States p. 593]
389
posted on
02/10/2011 1:46:04 PM PST
by
Ol' Sparky
(Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
To: DJ MacWoW
You arent sharing your views. You are stirring the pot.LOL That's your perspective. But you didn't answer my question.
390
posted on
02/10/2011 1:53:58 PM PST
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: HappyWarrior2012
Palin was angry that she was forced to sign it She wasn't forced to sign it. No one can force a governor to sign anything. Just like no one could force her to appoint a former Planned Parenthood board member to the Alaska Supreme Court.
Show me where Bachmann or Cain have said it is okay for homosexual activists to be part of the conservative movement. Show me where Palin has come out and defended DADT as Bachmann and Cain have.
391
posted on
02/10/2011 1:54:35 PM PST
by
Ol' Sparky
(Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
To: AnalogReigns
"however, she is interested in small governmentbut may be being influenced by libertarian "
,br> I agree with most of what you posted except this. Here record as Governor of Alaska and the positions she took as Mccain's VP were even less consistent with the principles of limited government. I do not see her as having a consistent ideology. She is more of a "us vs. them" populist.
392
posted on
02/10/2011 1:59:32 PM PST
by
rob777
To: DJ MacWoW
Nope, did not know that. Will do my due diligence on it. Thanks!
393
posted on
02/10/2011 2:00:04 PM PST
by
kroll
To: unseen1
No the country was and is great because the founders understood that power corrupts and crafted a government on the concept of checks and balances and limited power. Because they understand RIGHTS ARE ENDOWED THE CREATOR -- the God of the Bible. And, because they openly based criminal law on the Bible:
"Christianity is part of the common law"
[Sources: James Wilson, Course of Lectures [vol 3, p.122]; and quoted in Updegraph v. The Commonwealth, 11 Serg, & R. 393, 403 (1824).
"The Bible was America's basic textbook in all fields."
[Noah Webster. Our Christian Heritage p.5]
You're, apparently, trying to rewrite history just as liberals are attempting to do.
394
posted on
02/10/2011 2:00:19 PM PST
by
Ol' Sparky
(Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
To: trisham
HappyWarrior2011, HappyWarrior2010, HappyWarrior2009... Soon we will see HappyWarrior2011v2.0.
395
posted on
02/10/2011 2:02:10 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: kroll
You’re welcome. These are scary times!
396
posted on
02/10/2011 2:02:54 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: MEGoody
Explain how I could threaten you. Do I have the power of "zot" No.
Tell me your view on GOProud at CPAC. You haven't stated it. You've danced and ridiculed everyone that has stated they are against it. So what IS your opinion.
397
posted on
02/10/2011 2:08:11 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: PetroniusMaximus; altura
The obsession with gays on this forum is scary.
The gays obsession with reshaping our culture is scary.
'Amen ve'amen!
398
posted on
02/10/2011 2:12:20 PM PST
by
Zionist Conspirator
(Ve`asita vigdey-qodesh le`Aharon 'achikha, lekhavod uletif'aret.)
To: xjcsa
“Speaking of which, the Muslim Brotherhood’s infiltration of CPAC via David Keene and Grover Norquist is the *real* reason to stay away, in my view.”
You just hit the nail on the head there my friend.
399
posted on
02/10/2011 2:33:57 PM PST
by
Flyover Country
("Are you gonna pull those pistols or whistle Dixie??")
To: Ol' Sparky
Ooops...had I realized you were just an "anti-paliner", I wouldn't have responded.
Have a nice day.
400
posted on
02/10/2011 2:36:36 PM PST
by
FrankR
(The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 501-511 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson