Posted on 01/30/2011 10:28:13 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Seems to be she didn't either.
Wow, you managed to miss my entire point. LOL!
The big picture is only one that suffers the consequences can speak with experience about the virtue of not doing doing something. In the abortion on demand world there are no 'apparent' consequences to speak of that are suffered.
Get it?
Bristol Palin has accomplished absolutely nothing of note. The only difference between her and at least a handful of girls I went to high school with is that they didn't have famous mothers when they went out, slept around with complete losers, and got themselves pregnant outside of marriage.
She did the right thing by having the baby, but since when is doing what you're supposed to do worthy of heaps of praise and fame? What special insight could she possibly have into anything? She has it easy, and she's avoided all of the usual consequences of her actions by riding her mother's coat tails.
Speaking as a wife and mother raising daughters, she's no role model. She should serve as a horrible warning for any young person who hopes to become a mature, self-reliant adult one day.
Enough, already. Tired of reading about both of them.
Yep. Meghan McCain isn't much better.
I hope that those "conservatives?" who won't support Palin because she "can't win" are happy to associate themselves with these hate filled morons.
I think you miss the point e.g. big picture by simplifying and glossing over the realities
Failure? Getting pregnant is a moot issue when abortion on demand is the law of the land -some would call the abortion remedy a government sanctioned bailout. So, failure as you call it yet not define it; really what is failure -having the baby? Not abstaining was the failure and having a child one was not prepared for is the consequence...
I would suggest your line of thinking comprises a portion of that which underlies the abortion on demand culture. It is easy for any to claim a "birth free" success whether or not they abstain. It is my contention that putting a woman upon the stage that has not been pregnant does not cover the whole big picture. Why not have a Nun give the talk on abstinence or a man, any man...
The elephant in the room that the left does not want to address is the consequence that they consider irrelevant and easily aborted. THAT is why abstinence is considered irrelevant to the left as it involves discussing an inconvenient truth...
That is my opinion anyway...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.