Skip to comments.
Michele Bachmann for president in 2012? Why yes, thanks for asking
LA Times ^
| 1/9/11
| Andrew Malcolm
Posted on 01/09/2011 3:13:56 PM PST by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Contact Michele and urge her to run.
http://bachmann.house.gov/Contact/ZipCode.htm
1
posted on
01/09/2011 3:13:57 PM PST
by
pissant
To: pissant
2
posted on
01/09/2011 3:17:34 PM PST
by
Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
(Obama: ‘If They Bring a Knife to the Fight, We Bring a Gun’ (the REAL Arizona instigator))
To: pissant
3
posted on
01/09/2011 3:19:14 PM PST
by
Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
(Obama:If They Bring a Knife to the Fight, We Bring a Gun (the REAL Arizona instigator))
To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
4
posted on
01/09/2011 3:19:33 PM PST
by
pissant
((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
To: pissant
5
posted on
01/09/2011 3:20:25 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: pissant; ColdOne; Grammy; indylindy; MissTed; Ouderkirk; Padams; SoDak; trublu
Say, pissant .... what happened to your MB-pings???
To: pissant
I plan to vote for Palin.... but if she decided not to run, I could easily back Michele.
Palin/Michele would be killer.
7
posted on
01/09/2011 3:34:21 PM PST
by
Gator113
(I'm voting for Sarah Palin, Liberty, our Constitution and American Exceptionalism.)
To: pissant
From the article:
"This fall, Bachmann was targeted by numerous prominent Democrats..."
Democrats are 'targeting' Bachmann?! Someone call the police, FBI, SWAT, CIA!
8
posted on
01/09/2011 3:36:46 PM PST
by
Cobra64
To: pissant
9
posted on
01/09/2011 3:37:40 PM PST
by
Cobra64
To: hennie pennie
sorry, I don’t always remember
10
posted on
01/09/2011 3:38:55 PM PST
by
pissant
((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
To: Cobra64
DeMint/Bachmann - 2012
My dream team!
11
posted on
01/09/2011 3:42:07 PM PST
by
Fireone
(Liberals are just overschooled, undereducated, adult children.)
To: pissant
I like Bachmann, but another House Rep with no experience does not seem logical.
Why not run for larger office in her state first to see if she can do something other than maintain her safe seat.
12
posted on
01/09/2011 3:42:13 PM PST
by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: pissant
IIRC, only two individuals have ever been elected president with just a stint in the House of Representatives on their resume: Abraham Lincoln (16th president) and James A. Garfield (20th president) Why do you think that is?
13
posted on
01/09/2011 3:43:01 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Please donate to FreeRepublic, sanity in a world gone mad!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Not sure, but at least it has happened before. As opposed to a 1/3 term senator/community organizer/illegal alien winning. Who’d a thunk it?
14
posted on
01/09/2011 3:45:38 PM PST
by
pissant
((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
To: pissant
Neophyte senators have been elected president before (Jack Kennedy) but at least he had worn the uniform of the United States, despite all his other flaws. Mr. Obama couldn’t be bothered to even register with Selective Service, which takes about 30 seconds.
15
posted on
01/09/2011 3:48:32 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Please donate to FreeRepublic, sanity in a world gone mad!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I agree. Plus, his backround was completely obscured. Still is. Yet he won.
16
posted on
01/09/2011 3:51:04 PM PST
by
pissant
((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
To: Cobra64
And DHS, and BATF, and The Federal Marshalls...
17
posted on
01/09/2011 3:52:33 PM PST
by
pissant
((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
One explanation is that most people who become president have planned it for a long time, and their planning includes a series of steps which SEEM more likely to get them elected. Like being governor of a state or senator.
Could be that it’s not so much of an obstacle in the minds of voters—it’s just that the ambitious are extra careful in their planning. The result is that a much higher percentage of candidates have been governors and senators.
18
posted on
01/09/2011 3:54:49 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(Rules will never work for radicals (liberals) because they seek chaos. And don't even know it.)
To: pissant
He won with family (Saudi) money just as Jack Kennedy did with Joe’s bootlegging & rum running proceeds.
19
posted on
01/09/2011 3:57:00 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Please donate to FreeRepublic, sanity in a world gone mad!)
To: reasonisfaith
Both presidents I cited were elected in the 19th Century. No mere House member was elected president in the 20th Century. The presidency was much smaller and weaker back then than it is now. We see in Mr. Obama the fallacy of “on-the-job training” in the oval office.
20
posted on
01/09/2011 4:00:04 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Please donate to FreeRepublic, sanity in a world gone mad!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson