Skip to comments.
Obama uses recess appointment to seat Justice Dept. official
The Hill ^
| December 29, 2010
| Jordan Fabian
Posted on 12/29/2010 2:44:00 PM PST by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
12/29/2010 2:44:04 PM PST
by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
Does anybody have a running tally on the number of recess appts each president has made?
2
posted on
12/29/2010 2:45:22 PM PST
by
Sopater
(...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
To: jazusamo
3
posted on
12/29/2010 2:51:53 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
4
posted on
12/29/2010 2:53:46 PM PST
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: jazusamo
I'm a little confused about this, because I thought recess appointments only lasted until the end of the current senate term -- but that would be January 3rd, so what would the point be?
The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.
I guess "end of their next session" is interpreted as being the session FOLLOWING their current one, but I was certain that a recess appointment made in the summer would end on January 3rd.
Of course, I think it's pretty clear that the recess appointment clause only allows appointments for openings which OCCUR during recess. I don't know why the supreme court ever allowed recess appointments for vacancies where the senate simply refused to act.
To: Sopater
6
posted on
12/29/2010 3:02:13 PM PST
by
Just A Nobody
( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
To: Just A Nobody
7
posted on
12/29/2010 3:04:23 PM PST
by
Sopater
(...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
To: Just A Nobody
I’m confused...
How does Clinton (2-terms) have less total recess appointments than either G.W. Bush (2-terms) or Reagan (2-terms), but then come out ahead of them in the appointments measured by ratio of days on office/appt?
8
posted on
12/29/2010 3:06:55 PM PST
by
Sopater
(...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
To: CharlesWayneCT
I agree, the recess appointment process wasn’t intended to be used the way it has been in later years.
A hold was put on James Cole because of the corrupt Obama/Holder Justice Department and their failing to enforce laws, of course that wasn’t mentioned in this piece.
9
posted on
12/29/2010 3:06:57 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
To: Just A Nobody
thnx, what a failure odumbo is
10
posted on
12/29/2010 3:07:18 PM PST
by
italianquaker
( teabag the vote!!)
To: Just A Nobody
Justa! Thanks for posting that info. Good to “see” you. :-)
11
posted on
12/29/2010 3:09:13 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
To: BenLurkin
12
posted on
12/29/2010 3:16:10 PM PST
by
Just A Nobody
( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
To: Sopater
Because the ration of days/appointment is a misleading indicator — the smaller number means more appointments, as the number is how many days pass between each appointment.
Also, Obama’s days/appointment number is way off, since he’s been in office just about 24 months and has 15 appointments, that’s about 40+ days/appointment.
Obama shouldn’t have needed any recess appointments — he had a 60-vote majority in the senate, and even when he didn’t, he had a block of 4-7 republicans who really abhored the idea of blocking presidential appointments.
The reason he had to do any is because these 15 were so bad that Harry Reid wouldn’t even let them come to the floor for a cloture vote, because then there would have been public debate on them and it would have embarrased the democrats.
To: Sopater
You are welcome, but...I'm trying to figure out these charts myself. They don't make a lot of sense, do they?
I'll try and find more info.
14
posted on
12/29/2010 3:20:14 PM PST
by
Just A Nobody
( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
To: jazusamo
Hiya jaz! Really good to "see" you as well. Will try to get a FRmail off to you later tonight. ;*)
15
posted on
12/29/2010 3:23:45 PM PST
by
Just A Nobody
( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
To: Just A Nobody
Will be good to hear from you but take your time, I’ll be here. ;-)
16
posted on
12/29/2010 3:26:23 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
Probably another card carrier.
To: CharlesWayneCT; Sopater; italianquaker
18
posted on
12/29/2010 3:44:27 PM PST
by
Just A Nobody
( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
To: jazusamo
19
posted on
12/29/2010 3:45:01 PM PST
by
Just A Nobody
( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
To: BenLurkin
is that from “THE” Ann Dunham picture ?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson