Skip to comments.
Christine O'Donnell campaign spending under investigation by Feds
Wapo ^
| 12/29/10
| Ben Nuckols and Matthew Barakaft
Posted on 12/29/2010 2:05:58 PM PST by freespirited
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
I guess this was predictable.
To: freespirited
Wall, kiss my grits!!!
ANOTHER surprise!!!
I hope the GOP House keeps that bastard Obama and his accolytes so busy in the next two years, they have no time to harass honest, law-abiding conservatives.
2
posted on
12/29/2010 2:09:09 PM PST
by
ZULU
(No nation which tried to tolerate Islam escaped Islamization.)
To: freespirited
The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.....well then
3
posted on
12/29/2010 2:09:29 PM PST
by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: freespirited
I hope this is BS because I gave money to her campaign. I'm going to stop doing that. I contributed to Brown of Mass.... and what a disappointment he became! These were Sarah Palin picks; hence my disillusionment with her.
4
posted on
12/29/2010 2:10:02 PM PST
by
New Jersey Realist
(Congress doesn't care a damn about "we the people")
To: freespirited
The WarshPost article is based more or less on the AP story, and an earlier complaint by George Soros.
Note strongly that the WarshPost did not activate the COMMENTS BOARD for this one.
5
posted on
12/29/2010 2:13:52 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: freespirited
Karl Rove?
Hmm, one wonders what she did to catch almost as much flak as Sarah Palin has.
6
posted on
12/29/2010 2:15:46 PM PST
by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
To: New Jersey Realist
I think last time you and I crossed words here you were defending that Coakley gal against my belief that she tried to murder a reporter she thought was following her too closely.
I still think she tried to get him killed.
Your money probably made the difference in getting Brown into the Senate. Otherwise, you'd had another killer-pol in there.
7
posted on
12/29/2010 2:15:56 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: freespirited
Oh, that's just great. Hey WaPo and NYT, how about investigating Obama’s campaign sources, expenditures, major donors, foreign donors, etc? Oh, yeah, I forgot, he's off limits, jeez, okay, don't have a coronary, I forgot. . ugh, What, I'm under arrest? What for? . . .
8
posted on
12/29/2010 2:16:48 PM PST
by
Art in Idaho
(Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
To: freespirited
“a complaint about O’Donnell’s campaign spending filed by a watchdog group”
Hmmmmm, pretty much sums things up.
To: freespirited
So I guess she is a witch after all. Do you think she’ll float or sink?
To: freespirited
Amazing how fast other MSM pick up AP stories when they involve Republicans.
11
posted on
12/29/2010 2:22:51 PM PST
by
willk
To: New Jersey Realist
I don’t remember Palin endorsing Brown - but I might be very wrong.
I contributed to O’Donnell, too. This is just the Soros machine causing trouble for her.
To: freespirited
All they need to find is a receipt for 2 burgers and fries at Mac D’s, and it will be in the news for the next 2 weeks for sure.
13
posted on
12/29/2010 2:27:36 PM PST
by
Bringbackthedraft
(The candidate they smear and ridicule the most is the one they fear the most.)
To: freespirited
There is a lot of smoke here, there may be some fire.
That being said, I suspect she is being targeted because of her close association with Palin and the tea party movement. There are any number of politicians that have "mix-ups" in their bookkeeping. As a matter of fact it is practically a rite of passage among Democrats and most likely a prerequisite for admission to the Obama administration.
14
posted on
12/29/2010 2:29:14 PM PST
by
oldbrowser
(Blaming the prince of fools shouldn't blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that elected him)
To: Brilliant
The more important question is: is she heavier than a goose?
/Sad that people used to take that question seriously...
To: Bringbackthedraft
Diversionary tactics, it keeps your mind off things like Rangel and what ever her name is, from CA. MSM uses this kind of stuff as a smoke screen to get your attention away from more important things.
16
posted on
12/29/2010 2:30:24 PM PST
by
Bringbackthedraft
(The candidate they smear and ridicule the most is the one they fear the most.)
To: freespirited
Meanwhile, tax-cheat Rangel skates.
17
posted on
12/29/2010 2:45:08 PM PST
by
Arm_Bears
(I'll have what the gentleman on the floor is drinking.)
To: freespirited
As of her 11/22/2010 FEC report, O’Donnell still had $924,745. The article says the campaign was advised to hold back some funds for possible legal fees. Conservatives wanted her to win, but there was never any shortage of reasons to be a little uneasy about her.
http://www.fec.gov/DisclosureSearch/mapHSCandDetail.do
18
posted on
12/29/2010 2:45:39 PM PST
by
Will88
To: New Jersey Realist
Palin did not formally endorse Brown so you should retract your earlier statements.
19
posted on
12/29/2010 2:52:49 PM PST
by
frogjerk
(I believe in unicorns, fairies and pro-life Democrats.)
To: Will88
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson