Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Unreal..........
1 posted on 12/26/2010 10:05:28 AM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Another measure further limiting Obama's power to move prisoners out of Guantanamo was passed by Congress last week and is awaiting his signature or veto.

Funny how that little tidbit never saw the light of day.

35 posted on 12/26/2010 4:59:44 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"It's certainly not going to close in the next month," Gibbs said.

Oh, no, of course not. Nobody would be as reckless as to declare that it would be closed that soon.

36 posted on 12/26/2010 5:01:36 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Gibbs did not note that all the restrictions were signed into law by Obama, albeit as part of broader legislation. Another measure further limiting Obama's power to move prisoners out of Guantanamo was passed by Congress last week and is awaiting his signature or veto.

A) If he didn't veto previous legislation limiting his power to close Gitmo, why would he veto this one?

B) Who is behind this effort to portray Obama as a failure!?

37 posted on 12/26/2010 5:03:58 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

It’s only regrettable insofar as all of the “detainees” haven’t been hanged by their necks until they’re dead, dead, dead. Thanks Sub-Driver.


39 posted on 12/26/2010 5:31:39 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Drop them in Afghanistan, 100 yards from a US Base. Give them an AK with 5 bullets so it’s a fair fight.

Problem solved


40 posted on 12/26/2010 11:02:32 PM PST by mewykwistmas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Yeah, it’s regrettable.

It’s regrettable that we have to waste money holding them and catering to their muslim sensibilities and feeding them special diets and allowing them prayer time and giving them free medical care.

It’s regrettable that they just aren’t given the death penalty for their acts of war against the USA as enemy combatants.

Lots to regret....


42 posted on 12/27/2010 11:16:01 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Finally something I agree with...though his solution is almost certainly not the same as mine.


43 posted on 12/27/2010 11:41:26 AM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Finally something I agree with...though his solution is almost certainly not the same as mine.


44 posted on 12/27/2010 11:41:34 AM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

What is regrettable is the load of people from the clown car that moved into our White House.


45 posted on 12/27/2010 12:52:38 PM PST by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Indefinite retention of Gibbs and the entire entourage of the Obozo gaggle is a real danger to this nation.


47 posted on 12/27/2010 1:57:22 PM PST by IbJensen ("How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think"-A. Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

They are prisoners of war, and if the war lasts 100 years that’s their bad luck.

But the way things are going they may possibly all be honored guests at the White House.


48 posted on 12/27/2010 2:32:33 PM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Right for the wrong reason. As non-uniformed combatants, they should be subject to summary judgment upon capture.
49 posted on 12/27/2010 2:44:08 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("I'd rather lose fighting for the right cause than win fighting for the wrong cause." - Jim DeMint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I still say, take them to the beach, chum the waters and let the sharks disappear them, horrid accident, chapter over.


50 posted on 12/27/2010 5:31:32 PM PST by Karliner (Now this is not the end. .... But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning, Churchill 1942)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

So was 9/11 dumbass!


51 posted on 12/27/2010 7:29:48 PM PST by my small voice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

9/11 was “regretable” too dumbass (Gibbs)!


52 posted on 12/27/2010 7:30:42 PM PST by my small voice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"Some would be tried in federal courts, as we've seen done in the past. Some would be tried in military commissions, likely spending the rest of their lives in a maximum security prison that nobody, including terrorists, have ever escaped from. Some, regrettably, will have to be indefinitely detained," Gibbs said on CNN's "State of the Union" as he described Obama's beleaguered plan for closing Guantanamo.

Really? So, what has changed since the 2008 campaign?

53 posted on 12/27/2010 7:49:19 PM PST by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

He should have put out a qualifier ie it would be sad if someone whom was INNOCENT to be imprisoned forever.... a terrorist being imprisoned permanently is definitely not sad.


54 posted on 12/27/2010 10:07:21 PM PST by Rick_Michael (Have no fear "President Government" is here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

He is such an f-ing idiot that he’s a perfect mouthpiece for this group.


55 posted on 12/28/2010 6:36:56 AM PST by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Meanwhile, America held hostage indefinately by the DUh-bama's JACKASS party is perfectly acceptable?

56 posted on 12/28/2010 8:22:20 AM PST by RasterMaster (The only way to open a LIEberal mind is with a brick!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

When Bush did it, it was outrageous, possibly CRIMINAL.

But now, now that The Obamanauts are in charge, it’s ‘regrettable’.


57 posted on 12/28/2010 9:35:21 AM PST by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson