Unreal..........
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Another measure further limiting Obama's power to move prisoners out of Guantanamo was passed by Congress last week and is awaiting his signature or veto.Funny how that little tidbit never saw the light of day.
35 posted on
12/26/2010 4:59:44 PM PST by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Sub-Driver
"It's certainly not going to close in the next month," Gibbs said.Oh, no, of course not. Nobody would be as reckless as to declare that it would be closed that soon.
36 posted on
12/26/2010 5:01:36 PM PST by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Sub-Driver
Gibbs did not note that all the restrictions were signed into law by Obama, albeit as part of broader legislation. Another measure further limiting Obama's power to move prisoners out of Guantanamo was passed by Congress last week and is awaiting his signature or veto. A) If he didn't veto previous legislation limiting his power to close Gitmo, why would he veto this one?
B) Who is behind this effort to portray Obama as a failure!?
37 posted on
12/26/2010 5:03:58 PM PST by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...
It’s only regrettable insofar as all of the “detainees” haven’t been hanged by their necks until they’re dead, dead, dead. Thanks Sub-Driver.
39 posted on
12/26/2010 5:31:39 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: Sub-Driver
Drop them in Afghanistan, 100 yards from a US Base. Give them an AK with 5 bullets so it’s a fair fight.
Problem solved
To: Sub-Driver
Yeah, it’s regrettable.
It’s regrettable that we have to waste money holding them and catering to their muslim sensibilities and feeding them special diets and allowing them prayer time and giving them free medical care.
It’s regrettable that they just aren’t given the death penalty for their acts of war against the USA as enemy combatants.
Lots to regret....
42 posted on
12/27/2010 11:16:01 AM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Sub-Driver
Finally something I agree with...though his solution is almost certainly not the same as mine.
43 posted on
12/27/2010 11:41:26 AM PST by
nina0113
To: Sub-Driver
Finally something I agree with...though his solution is almost certainly not the same as mine.
44 posted on
12/27/2010 11:41:34 AM PST by
nina0113
To: Sub-Driver
What is regrettable is the load of people from the clown car that moved into our White House.
45 posted on
12/27/2010 12:52:38 PM PST by
Flint
To: Sub-Driver
Indefinite retention of Gibbs and the entire entourage of the Obozo gaggle is a real danger to this nation.
47 posted on
12/27/2010 1:57:22 PM PST by
IbJensen
("How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think"-A. Hitler)
To: Sub-Driver
They are prisoners of war, and if the war lasts 100 years that’s their bad luck.
But the way things are going they may possibly all be honored guests at the White House.
48 posted on
12/27/2010 2:32:33 PM PST by
devere
To: Sub-Driver
Right for the wrong reason. As non-uniformed combatants, they should be subject to summary judgment upon capture.
49 posted on
12/27/2010 2:44:08 PM PST by
Colonel_Flagg
("I'd rather lose fighting for the right cause than win fighting for the wrong cause." - Jim DeMint)
To: Sub-Driver
I still say, take them to the beach, chum the waters and let the sharks disappear them, horrid accident, chapter over.
50 posted on
12/27/2010 5:31:32 PM PST by
Karliner
(Now this is not the end. .... But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning, Churchill 1942)
To: Sub-Driver
To: Sub-Driver
9/11 was “regretable” too dumbass (Gibbs)!
To: Sub-Driver
"Some would be tried in federal courts, as we've seen done in the past. Some would be tried in military commissions, likely spending the rest of their lives in a maximum security prison that nobody, including terrorists, have ever escaped from. Some, regrettably, will have to be indefinitely detained," Gibbs said on CNN's "State of the Union" as he described Obama's beleaguered plan for closing Guantanamo. Really? So, what has changed since the 2008 campaign?
53 posted on
12/27/2010 7:49:19 PM PST by
Hoodat
(Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
To: Sub-Driver
He should have put out a qualifier ie it would be sad if someone whom was INNOCENT to be imprisoned forever.... a terrorist being imprisoned permanently is definitely not sad.
54 posted on
12/27/2010 10:07:21 PM PST by
Rick_Michael
(Have no fear "President Government" is here)
To: Sub-Driver
He is such an f-ing idiot that he’s a perfect mouthpiece for this group.
55 posted on
12/28/2010 6:36:56 AM PST by
b4its2late
(Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
To: Sub-Driver
Meanwhile, America held hostage indefinately by the DUh-bama's JACKASS party is perfectly acceptable?
56 posted on
12/28/2010 8:22:20 AM PST by
RasterMaster
(The only way to open a LIEberal mind is with a brick!)
To: Sub-Driver
When Bush did it, it was outrageous, possibly CRIMINAL.
But now, now that The Obamanauts are in charge, it’s ‘regrettable’.
57 posted on
12/28/2010 9:35:21 AM PST by
WayneS
(Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson