Skip to comments.
Reporters told: Don't say 'illegal immigrant'
WND ^
| December 18, 2010
| Bob Unruh
Posted on 12/19/2010 10:36:44 AM PST by La Lydia
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: La Lydia
21
posted on
12/19/2010 10:53:10 AM PST
by
Carley
(ISRAEL.......NOT SO ALONE!!!)
To: La Lydia
Suddenly, the journalists are concerned about the Constitution? What a joke.
22
posted on
12/19/2010 10:54:41 AM PST
by
Rocky
(REPEAL IT!)
To: La Lydia
Leo, the constitution essentially starts with a little blurb about “freedom of speech.”
Ever hear of that?
23
posted on
12/19/2010 10:56:16 AM PST
by
bill1952
(Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
To: La Lydia
So you now have “journalists” saying the free exercise of speech is unconstitutional? Incredible.
24
posted on
12/19/2010 10:57:05 AM PST
by
rbg81
(When you see Obama, shout: "DO YOUR JOB!!")
To: Comparative Advantage
And it is not unconstitutional to call something what it is. Only Marxists play that game.
To: La Lydia
They should be called “Criminals” because that is what they are, criminals..they are breaking the law..its that simple
To: La Lydia
illegal immigrant...illegal immigrant...illegal immigrant...illegal immigrant...illegal immigrant
Come and git me, if you got the sand. This is all protected free speech.
27
posted on
12/19/2010 10:58:58 AM PST
by
crazyhorse691
(Now that the libs are in power dissent is not only unpatriotic, but, it is also racist.)
To: La Lydia
Is “foreign invader” acceptable?
28
posted on
12/19/2010 11:02:13 AM PST
by
reg45
To: Zuben Elgenubi; La Lydia
Newspeak. Soon theyll be guests. Uninvited Foreign Guests? Kind of like the ex mother-in-law showing up as a Christmas dinner surprise?
29
posted on
12/19/2010 11:02:31 AM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
(Islam: A Satanically Transmitted Disease spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus)
To: La Lydia
This reminds me of 1995, when my battalion got sent to Gitmo to babysit Cuban and Haitian refugees. We were told that under no circumstances were we to refer to them as "refugees" (even though they were), "rafters" (even though that's what they were), or anything other than "migrants". IOW, they weren't to be considered people who were risking their lives, tearing down their shacks to build rafts in order to flee the tyranny of their Communist government and seek the safety and freedom of the USA, we were supposed to look at them simply as wanderers, going from one place to another.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
30
posted on
12/19/2010 11:02:35 AM PST
by
wku man
(Still holding my breath, but exhaling a bit after Nov. 2...)
To: La Lydia
To be technically correct, most of the illegal aliens are in fact criminal invaders.
31
posted on
12/19/2010 11:03:28 AM PST
by
umgud
To: La Lydia
32
posted on
12/19/2010 11:08:06 AM PST
by
Dallas59
(President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
To: La Lydia
I remember when the Society of Professional Journalists concerned itself with actual standards of professional conduct. They’re now so stupid as to openly self-identify as robotic Leninists.
To: Comparative Advantage
Illegal Mexicans, illegal Iranians, illegal Somalians, Illegal Iraquis, illegal presidents, illegitimate reporters, ....
better?
34
posted on
12/19/2010 11:10:30 AM PST
by
knarf
(Who's Holi ? - Christ I know, you obviously don't - let me tell you about him - Romans 10:13)
To: max americana
Geographically challenged.
To: La Lydia
“Wetback” was acceptable to President Eisenhower, nad the American public back then.
PS It still is, unless one is PC impaired.
36
posted on
12/19/2010 11:14:57 AM PST
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
To: La Lydia
What’s unconstitutional about it? Can they point out where in the Constitution it prohibits use of terms like “illegal aliens”?
Still, if it’s their preference, I guess I could use “illegal invaders.” Or some even worse...
37
posted on
12/19/2010 11:20:00 AM PST
by
MizSterious
("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
To: La Lydia
The same group of ninnies banned the word terrorist from being associated with the word Muslim.
The "guideline" was issued within days of 9/11/2001.
If it was absolutely impossible to do that then the "journalist" must include examples of American terrorists such as the anti-abortion movement.
These professional "journalists" named several other things "journalists" should do to perform their duties in a "responsible" manner.
.. and citizens have died defending those kinds of "rights?"
38
posted on
12/19/2010 11:23:10 AM PST
by
WilliamofCarmichael
(If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
To: La Lydia
Illegal aliens is the proper term. Foreign invaders is my preference, however. IMO, masses of people streaming across our borders illegally is an act of war. It should be treated as such.
39
posted on
12/19/2010 11:34:56 AM PST
by
upsdriver
(to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
To: La Lydia
40
posted on
12/19/2010 11:42:38 AM PST
by
tumblindice
(OK, I'll go to Room 101. But I still say `2 plus two equals four.' That's because you're insane, tum)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson