already been done... 
Posted on 12/15/2010 11:10:44 AM PST by La Lydia
First female President --- None, yet.
First gay President --- ????
Many think that James Buchanan was gay, but we'll never know. It's even been suggested that Abraham Lincoln may have been gay (or bisexual), but again we'll never know.
Many gays have gotten married, and had children, keeping their sexual orientation a secret, so there are many possibilities. Gays can only be discriminated against, for their sexual orientation, if they choose to make it possible. Blacks don't get to choose their race, and women don't get to choose their gender.
carter is pushing the extreme as a ratchet effect to push on dadt
they are also push the George Washington and his valet were homosexuals too.
homosexuals always claim the dead.
Before anyone gets too negative, think about it. How many national parks and monuments need decorating?
Did you notice the guy in the maroon shirt to the left of the man-hug? Looks like the whole thing is a gathering of poofters.
What got me to thinking about this was a post here about having the World Cup in some mideastern country and someone in a press conference bringing up the question if that was a good idea since homosexuality is outlawed in that country. I don’t know that gays had trouble attending the World Cup anywhere else, or if they would have trouble in the mideastern country, but it just seemed like an odd question. I mean, why did that, of all questions, come up?
So, is Carter saying either Hillary or Obama is gay?
I guess Obama beat him to the result...
Homosexual behavior has been adopted by the political left because (a) they can never have enough 'victims' and, (b) homosexual behavior is in direct opposition to Christian, biblical values, something the left generally hate. In addition, homosexual behavior is destructive to the family and so, weakens society, always a goal of the left who abhor America's God-fearing origins. Thus, the left embraces homosexual behavior and uses it to promote it's agenda, always characterizing 'gays' as 'victims' that need 'protection' - by the Nanny-State government.
Today, the 'PC' mindset makes even the slightest negative opinion of homosexual behavior almost a crime. Soon, even a Christian minister preaching from the Bible and referencing Sodom and Gomorrah in the Old Testament or Paul's letters to the Christian churches in the New Testament where he routinely includes homosexual behavior as a sin, will be deemed a 'hate crime' and the church/minister fined - or worse. Don't think it can't happen. It already has in other countries and the leftists are working toward moving the U.S. to that position. So, the glorification of perverse, homosexual behavior continues and now, the old fool, Jimmy Carter, has shown us where the left really wants to go with this. Fortunately, in the U.S., homosexual behavior is tolerated, not celebrated. Big difference.
already been done...
Magic 8-Ball says: “Reply hazy, try again”
He was a drooling imbecile as he sat in the White Hut and he still drools as he drags his hands along behind him while he totters down the halls of an unforgiving history.
Homosexuals as presidential candidates? Great idea Jimmy. The only thing wrong is that they are seriously flawed in their head. (Much like you, prune face.)
The MSM doesn’t say much about it, but these fecal munchers have committed the lions share of the serial killings in the world. With their eyes on our youth, I consider them as much of a threat to America as the Jihadists.
Iran hostage crisis
(29 Years Ago Today, Jimmy Carter’s Weakness Emboldened Islamofacists!)
Infoplease.com | Info Please
Posted on 11/04/2007 6:52:11 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1920984/posts
Are you sure that his relationship with King was sexual? Romantic friendships were prevalent in nineteenth century America. Homosexuality was only “discovered” (as a condition) in the 1860’s. It’s hard for me to imagine his openly talking of “wooing” gentlemen if it was sexual. Wouldn’t that behavior have been a crime in nineteenth-century America?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.