Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breyer: Madison wrote 2nd Amendment to appease the states
hotair ^ | 13 December, 2010 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 12/14/2010 4:30:58 AM PST by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
So Justice Breyer's argument is that if the states force a Constitutional amendment on the federal government, that the author lies about, then the amendment doesn't have the force of law?

Breyer isn't stupid. Perhaps he is simply intellectually dishonest or moraly bankrupt.

1 posted on 12/14/2010 4:31:05 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Justice Breyer: If you are not willing to uphold the entire Constitution, STEP DOWN!
2 posted on 12/14/2010 4:32:34 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Planning on using 911? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Hmmm... I guess Breyer would argue that the Magna Carta should have no effect because it was forced on King John.
3 posted on 12/14/2010 4:33:14 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
the states wouldn’t sign the Constitution for fear of creating an overmighty central government

So it isn't about hunting or militias? Just like we all know; thanks for making the case for us Breyer even if you go about it ass backwards.

4 posted on 12/14/2010 4:35:55 AM PST by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BartMan1; Nailbiter; Forecaster

ping


5 posted on 12/14/2010 4:37:12 AM PST by IncPen (Educating Barack Obama has been the most expensive project in human history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Excellent point. I watched that interview the other day and I must say it was quite frightening.


6 posted on 12/14/2010 4:39:27 AM PST by republicangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Thank you. I heard Breyer make this ridciulous assertion in the interview with Chris Wallace. I am astounded that the idiot media in this country lets him get away with these claims but they are coomplicit in the treason Madison describes. That Breyer could even make such claims when what you have posted is available indicates just how far down the path we are.


7 posted on 12/14/2010 4:39:43 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
breyer is a lying, pos, red diaper doper baby, anti-American, communist demon from hell. He will burn in hell for the sins he has committed in the name of JUSTICE... The DARK ANGEL will visit him one day... for he has shown himself to unrepentant and irredeemable.

LLS

8 posted on 12/14/2010 4:43:43 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

In that interview with Wallace he was asked a number of questions he dodged. Breyer missed his calling: He is a politician in judges robes.


9 posted on 12/14/2010 4:45:28 AM PST by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I like that... and had it in the back of my mind when I read your post... WELL DONE... OUTSTANDING!

LLS


10 posted on 12/14/2010 4:45:33 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“Breyer isn’t stupid. Perhaps he is simply intellectually dishonest or moraly bankrupt. “...

Think so, maybe he is JUST a liberal...


11 posted on 12/14/2010 4:46:00 AM PST by jrl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicangel
” I watched that interview the other day and I must say it was quite frightening.”

Yes, and the comment that ‘historians are on our side’ is ridiculous. Liberal university trained ‘historians’ have been revising history to fit their ideology and agenda for quite some time now. I could care less about how these ‘historians’ interpret history. I only care about confirmable historical facts, and reading something in a textbook written by a liberal does not in any way constitute a ‘confirmed’ historical fact.

12 posted on 12/14/2010 4:46:26 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Laws are written so as to make it not necessary to figure out was going on in the law maker’s mind. It is generally considered to be impossible to read someone’s mind. The written law is much more precise. That a Supreme Court Justice would claim it is possible and desirable to read a dead man’s mind would indicate that Justice either has pre-dementia or is a scoundrel.


13 posted on 12/14/2010 4:46:48 AM PST by rgboomers (This space purposely left blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melchior
If they ever let Darth Vader ginsberg do an honest interview like this... she would make this rancid excrement named breyer look tame.

LLS

14 posted on 12/14/2010 4:47:59 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

So now our elite Leftists on the SCOTUS are channeling our Founding Fathers and telling us what they really thought? I guess it’s not surprising that Hillary! was conversing with Eleanor Roosevelt. Leftists have sooooo many talents!


15 posted on 12/14/2010 4:48:12 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

PS-Justice Breyer is both.


16 posted on 12/14/2010 4:48:45 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Is it possible to impeach a treasonous supreme?


17 posted on 12/14/2010 4:49:28 AM PST by Hardraade (I want gigaton warheads now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle
My son was 14 on 9/11/01. I told him to remember things as they happened........that the history books will be written by those with an agenda. I know he's been paying close attention since then.
18 posted on 12/14/2010 4:51:01 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
...James Madison only included the right to bear arms reluctantly, and only because the states wouldn’t sign the Constitution for fear of creating an overmighty central government.

Epic Fail, States. Epic Fail.

19 posted on 12/14/2010 4:53:21 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doodad

“fear of creating an overmighty central government”

Their fears were well-founded. Over analyzing the Constitution by less wiser heads than wrote it can result in dismantling and chaos. The words, “We’ve given you a Constitution, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT,” were wise words, indeed.


20 posted on 12/14/2010 4:58:11 AM PST by Twinkie (Doing nothing is the most tiring job there is; you can't quit and rest . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson