Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scoot over, Mitt & Sarah, more will run
Boston Herald ^ | 12/13/10 | Holly Ribichaud

Posted on 12/13/2010 11:42:42 AM PST by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last
To: dirtboy; pissant
I have a feeling you will find the most unelectable of the bunch to support, yet again.

Cousin Steve 2012

21 posted on 12/13/2010 12:02:31 PM PST by NeoCaveman (Touch my tagline and I'll have you arrested)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: maxter
Sarah said she would run if there wasn’t someone in the bunch that she could support.

She'll have to run then because there isn't a one in that bunch worth supporting.

22 posted on 12/13/2010 12:05:00 PM PST by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Oh, I’m sure there will be. The question is whether most of them will get anywhere near those two, much less past them.


23 posted on 12/13/2010 12:06:18 PM PST by RichInOC (Palin 2012: BOOM. Taste My Cluebat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24

Not soon.

We’ve already been bothered non stop by HuckaHillbilly, Pawlenty, and Thune, to the point of them being obnoxious. Yes, we know you want to be president....it ain’t gonna happen...

I think from Sarah we will be seeing plenty of trips abroad to meet with other world leaders, and an increase in policy speeches and editorials.

She will continue to be the main voice of opposition to the Obama agenda, as she has been for the past two years.

I don’t think she will formally announce for a long time, but I could be wrong.


24 posted on 12/13/2010 12:07:32 PM PST by t-dude (Sarah causes banal and vituperous evil snarks to shriek in horror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

There were only two to choose from (three if you count Tommy Thompson who dropped out very quickly). Tanc and Hunter. You actually believe that Hunter would have put up such a pansy-ass fight like McCain against Obama had he been nominated? LOL.


25 posted on 12/13/2010 12:07:39 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DM1
she will be able to find someone endorse him/her and continue to make oodles of cash while saying she is comfortable with her choice.

You don't understand the Palins. It isn't about the money.

26 posted on 12/13/2010 12:08:01 PM PST by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant

What clown have you picked?


27 posted on 12/13/2010 12:09:34 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
You actually believe that Hunter would have put up such a pansy-ass fight like McCain against Obama had he been nominated? LOL.

Given that Hunter got all of one delegate throughout the primary process, yeah, I'd say he would have fared even worse in the general.

28 posted on 12/13/2010 12:10:14 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Well, er, your boy couldn’t even get the nomination.


29 posted on 12/13/2010 12:11:40 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Hey how are you? Have not heard from you in awhile. Hope all is well.


30 posted on 12/13/2010 12:13:48 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Just what are the requirements to ‘run’ for President?

Just what does it ‘take’ to win?????

What makes a GOOD President????

(note: Hell will probably freeze over before there is any consensus on the above statements)


31 posted on 12/13/2010 12:14:35 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altura

They don’t call the GOP the stupid party for nothing.


32 posted on 12/13/2010 12:14:41 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Pissant, here are your heroes (sans Romney)


33 posted on 12/13/2010 12:14:55 PM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

oh pissant...

if ‘if’s and but’s’ were candy and nuts...

I can’t believe how clueless you are. It’s funny to watch!

Look real hard among those no chance House members, I’m sure there’s one in a safe district who has a perfect conservative record for you (as if that is all that matters)... I doubt they are as conservative as I am though.

Hell, Duncan Hunter endorsed Huckabee, I’m not that wishy washy!


34 posted on 12/13/2010 12:15:27 PM PST by t-dude (Sarah causes banal and vituperous evil snarks to shriek in horror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DM1

An extremely clever statement. Leaves her free to go either way.

I do believe that, with current disillusionment with Obama and Sarah’s ability to generate interest and support, she could win.

She’d be a great president.


35 posted on 12/13/2010 12:16:00 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant

There isn’t a single real conservative listed in the bunch. None of these named are going to beat Obama running a Liberal-Lite campaign....the only one of this group with a real chance is Huckabee because of his “aw shucks” Opie Taylor country-isms (still liberal lite)


36 posted on 12/13/2010 12:16:33 PM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Whenever something is "Global"...it means its bad for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

His staunch stance against TARP alone would have made him a hero. Alas, the stupid party picked an abject retard.


37 posted on 12/13/2010 12:17:26 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Despite a hit reality cable show and book tour, it is unlikely that Palin will abandon her money-making efforts or her status as a king-maker to run.

And what evidence does Holly Hyphen Hyphen Blueblood cite that she won't run? NONE. Has Sarah said anything about it except that she's considering it? What do these lamestream media types know?

38 posted on 12/13/2010 12:17:45 PM PST by backwoods-engineer (Onward to the battle royal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

“You don’t understand the Palins. It isn’t about the money.”

um i am pretty sure that TLC show is about the money
as for whether she runs or not we shall see
i dont think she is i think she just keeps people guessing but i could be wrong


39 posted on 12/13/2010 12:17:52 PM PST by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: altura

“An extremely clever statement. Leaves her free to go either way.”

exactly
says just enough and committed/noncommitted enough that she can do either or and still be true to the statement
personally i dont think she will run but time will tell


40 posted on 12/13/2010 12:19:05 PM PST by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson