Posted on 12/04/2010 11:31:48 AM PST by pissant
I like DeMint and I like Mike Pence and I like Rubio and several conservatives. If anyone were to consider Michelle Bachman seriously, the attacks on her would rival those on Sarah.
I just like Sarah more and I think she has a better chance of getting the nomination and winning. She draws more crowds and attracts more interest than anyone.
In the two years since the election, Obama’s stock has shot down, while Sarah’s has shot up.
Newt practically announced he would run this morning. He also said that Romney was the front runner and Mike Huckabee the most popular. Dunno where he’s been to think that. No retreads from 2008, thank you.
You’re an idiot...
I thought you were presenting an argument in counter to my comment that you were replying to. So I thought the point of your post was to argue against what I said, and that this was your argument.
I apologize.
Don't forget "she's polarizing." As soon as I read/hear that gem I know I'm dealing with a parroting non-thinker.
“Obama’s stock has shot down, while Sarah’s has shot up”
Good point!
To be honest, the entire topic is water under the bridge. We have to look forward.
I live in CA, and we're stuck with Boxer for the next six years not to mention Governor Moonbeam, so having a back and forth on a FR thread is the least of our problems. LOL
I honestly think that Newt doesn’t get it. Seriously, I believe he still thinks that he can get the mainstream media and the Democrats to like him if he goes along with them, especially after all the crap that he caught when he was in Congress after ‘94. Newt is a big proponent of global warming for pete’s sake! And as far as I know, he’s the only Republican to do a commercial showing him snuggling with Nancy Pelosi on a couch talking about how global warming is a problem.
**u* YO*~
Actually, the latest census shows that the average US family consists of 3.14 individuals. Far less than the 10+ that you believe is normal. Nonetheless, and despite my own opinion as to the size of families, you are more than welcome to procreate as much as you want to as long as it’s not on my dime.
I guess not. Please explain the context to me.
And with that, any aspirations Palin had to be President went right down the crapper....
She wore out her welcome long before that, with her dazed and confused amnesty pimping.
If you don’t know, just say so.
No, sir. You may have noticed the new gambit that's been showing up the past couple of weeks.
Apparently Sarah Palin is some sort of anti-Judy Garland. If you don't totally love her, you're a homosexual.
The context, which you're evidently too lazy to investigate for yourself, is that some folks use sign-up dates to judge posts. It doesn't matter if the new poster is right or wrong, if he's new he's automatically wrong. I think you'll agree that that's a pretty mindless way of "arguing."
Given that I "outrank" CNN by some 7 years, he's a "noob" as well, and by the "noob" standard his comments are not worth considering by those who have been around longer than him.
He got the point. You didn't.
No I most certainly didn’t. And your answer makes no sense. You first argue in favor of my point, then babble about your seniority. Do you even read your own posts?
Sigh. You really don’t get it, and I’m not about to waste my time trying to explain it to you. Have a nice night.
He made fun of CNN calling him a noob in response to someone questioning why some posters - as CNN did, claim signup dates are important.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.