At best, he was born a dual citizen. A Natural Born Citizen of the U.S. can not be born with foreign alligience owed. It defies the reason the framers put that requirement into the Constitution (post grandfather clause) for the position of Command in Chief of the armed forces. For obvious reasons.
How sweet.
Welllllllllllllll,
I have news for them . . . the key folks of evil hearts involved in his case.
will not have one creature speak up in their behalf before the Judgment bar of God. They will go to their eternal damnation with the blessed PRAISES TO GOD of the righteous.
They will loathe the day they thought one ill word toward Lakin.
How is this any different than if an officer refused deployment orders when Bush was President because he "stole" the 2000 election? Should such a defendant be permitted to put on all evidence of supposed voter fraud, etc., in Florida, and essentially re-argue that whole election?
I was an officer in the military myself. If you're going to refuse to obey what appears to be a lawful order, you had better be so overwhelmingly right about it that you are vindicated almost immediately. That is clearly not the case here because there is a lot of disagreement on this issue. You cannot run a military if every officer -- and every enlisted, for that matter -- can refuse to obey orders because they've got an issue with an election, and aren't satsified with the manner in which the courts have addressed that issue.
Our constitution prescribes procedures to resolve these kind of issues, which is why the Supreme Court ultimately resolved the 2000 election dispute. The exact same system is in place today, and uniformed officers must respect that rather than relying on their own idiosyncratic views of how courts "should" rule.
I don't care how courageous or humble his request was, he's still out of line.