Posted on 11/24/2010 5:12:11 AM PST by SJackson
I’m ready for the next Crusade. We need to flush all theswe bastards out of America before they outnumber all non-Muslims and establish Sharia Law - the ultimate goal of these lunatics.
God Bless Debbie Schlussel.
LOL! Thanks!
To the deceived -i.e. the homosexual- the Communist —the Muslim etc. any who disagree with their dementia is unstable.
That public schools —even in Michigan promote Islam is every bit as evil as national policy promoting homosexuality.
People...whatever you think of Debbie, at least she brought this topic up. Look up Fordson’s website. The first thing that hit me was the Arabic scrawl on the home page. Next, look up the faculty. Creepy.
Click on post #8.
Seems as if the conduct of this Islamist principal has been outrageous for a long time.
Former Mayor Hubbard must be rolling over in his grave!
Yep and this thread needs to be junked.......
Mr. Robinson does not want anything about DS posted here...............that's good enough for me.
IIRC, the SCOTUS has ruled that at a (public) public school event, any sectarian prayer led by a school official is unconstitutional, as it represents a de facto establishment of a government-preferred religion. The establishment clause has been extended by judicial decisions well beyond Congress, as a prohibition on all government agencies, not only federal, but state, municipal, and county entities as well.
I've heard Debbie Schlussel called some names, but "ignorant" would be the last adjective one would use to describe her.
IIRC, the SCOTUS has ruled that at a (public) public school event, any sectarian prayer led by a school official is unconstitutional, as it represents a de facto establishment of a government-preferred religion. The establishment clause has been extended by judicial decisions well beyond Congress, as a prohibition on all government agencies, not only federal, but state, municipal, and county entities as well.
I've heard Debbie Schlussel called some names, but "ignorant" would be the last adjective one would use to describe her.
If you would like to be added or dropped from the Michigan ping list, please freepmail me.
When she’s talking about this subject, she is right on.
If anyone knows her personally, please tell her to stick to what she knows, and to stop being a fruit loop the rest of the time.
Go Debbie!
At the time the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution, 12 of 13 emerging states had legal requirements for officeholders that included aspects of faith. For example, you had to believe in God in some states, in Delaware you needed to believe in the Trinity, etc. Virginia was the only one without such laws, but they were working on theirs. What Patrick Henry and George Mason were worried about was that the new federal gummint would tell the states what to do about their local practices.
"Congress shall make no law..." is a far cry from blessing God at a pre-game ceremony.
Read George Washington's Thanksgiving Proclamation from 1789 and tell me if SCOTUS would have OK'd it.
Have a wonderful holiday.
The point is that her job as an attorney is to seek redress for the injustices done to her clients by the Islamist public school principal. In that respect, the best tool for her is a federal civil rights suit claiming that her clients, the non-Muslim teachers, were discriminated against and retaliated against by a city official for their practice of a faith different from his. In doing so, she will make use of a line of federal court decisions holding that similar actions in similar circumstances were deprivations of federal constitutional rights pursuant to the "establishment" clause. It's not a question of whether she approves of the line of reasoning or even the results of these precedents, it's a question of making use of them for optimizing her chances for vindication for her aggrieved clients.
VERY few people actually know the origins of the religious part of the First Amendment, and you say that you are aware...excellent. How you can say that SHE knows escapes me...Rush does not even appear to know this when he talks about this issue.
And please answer my question: would SCOTUS now claim the President Washington violated the First?
I wondered what that noise was.
Ms Schlussel deserves credit for doing the right thing here. Thanks for pointing that out, justiceseeker93.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.