[RichInOC]

No! Weawwy?

[reefdiver]

and without asking for any bipartisanship the new house members had better halt funding to it

[Magic Fingers]

I wish more of the GOP were equally ruthless.

[JudyinCanada]

I agree with Rhambo on this one. Wouldn’t bipartisanship (except in times of war) just produce a bunch of moderates? More or less one party?

I may be simple, but I think politicians should clearly state their beliefs, and stand or fall by them. There are two parties, and that should mean two clear and different choices.

[Brilliant]

He agrees with Limbaugh. And for a change, he admits it.

[volunbeer]

I can finally agree with him about something.

If your opponent is going the wrong way and you meet him halfway...... which way are you going? We have not seen a single GOP President since Ronaldus Magnus that is willing to tell the rats that they are wrong. Whichever GOP candidate figures this out wins in 2012.

[MCH]

That cuts strongly against the image of Rahm as the chief internal advocate of the White House's strategy of deal-making and accommodation with Republicans.

So, which delusion libtards in the MSM ever had THIS "image?" News to me.

[Houghton M.]

Rahm never believed in anything. He’s the poster boy for unprincipled Might Makes Right. So, for once he’s honest. He never believed.

[KansasGirl]

Funny, I don’t remember any deal-making and accomodations being made with/for Republicans. As I recall, they had to dealmake and accomodate to get their own Democrat Party members on board. Somebody is re-writing history again!

[Nachum]

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[M-cubed]

the lesson of Clinton's failure to pass reform was that it was imperative to put a premium on getting it done quickly. <<

Hey Rahm...We feel the same way about hanging u commie ba$tards after we take back the country....but luckily for u..the Constitution will stand in our way and you'll get a trial...

[Carley]

Rahm still smoking crack, I see.

[KC_Conspirator]

In a new book, Rahm claims he privately argued to Obama that he shouldn't pursue bipartisan support for health reform, because it would take too much time, instead insisting that the lesson of Clinton's failure to pass reform was that it was imperative to put a premium on getting it done quickly. That cuts strongly against the image of Rahm as the chief internal advocate of the White House's strategy of deal-making and accommodation with Republicans.

What the eff planet is the ComPost on? It was the most partisan effort of a whole slew of partisan efforts. They held private meetings, locked republicans out, and shoved this down Americas throat on a partisan vote. They even broke congressional rules to do so.

[NormsRevenge]

Rahm: Win at all cost with no regard for the damage to the economy.

Brilliant!

Have fun in Chicago, Putz!

[wardaddy]

neither do I Rahm.

[TeachableMoment]

Rahm and me, agree! Me neither!

[Danae]

OMG !!!!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOO WAY!!!!!!!!!

/EPIC sarc

[Bigun]

Rahm: I never believed in bipartisanship

Well damn!

Now I have something in common with Rahm!

[ripley]

No compromise with Democrats. Period.

Partisanship, partisanship, partisanship!

No compromise with progressive, communist phalluses.

IMHO

[Sloth]

"That cuts strongly against the image of Rahm as the chief internal advocate of the White House's strategy of deal-making and accommodation with Republicans."

Bizarre. Who ever even suggested that this was the case?