Posted on 11/12/2010 10:35:14 AM PST by ColdOne
I have loved him from the get go.
Why is there sseemingly no love on this forum for Jindal in 2012 or Jindal period? There is always infighting in primaries but to put all chickens in one basket at this stage is foolish.
Jindal is a good and decent man. Example-
Posted on November 11, 2010
NEW ORLEANS – This afternoon Gov. Bobby Jindal said thank you to veteran after veteran. He handed out roughly 300 military medals to veterans in Bogalusa, including Sgt. Jimmy Pecoraro.
“It is such an honor,” he said. “It’s nice to be here. I was actually expecting to come here and there would be about 50 people, but it looks like 400 or 500 people here. It is really an honor.”
For Jindal, handing out medals is nothing new. He’s now given out medals at 68 different Veterans events – 16,000 medals all together.
http://www.wwltv.com/home/Jindal-Brees-remember-sacrifices-of-veterans-107349253.html
there is... my only concern is that he not come out of the wings before his time... i know this an unpopular thing to say here, but i think Sarah Palin would have been better off making her national debut later than she did as McCain's running mate... that being said, she's in the mix now, and more power to her... i have high hopes for Jindahl... i hope to see it materialize...
Me too ColdOne. Both my husband and I are huge Jindal fans. We see him as the only possible candidate so far to not only be able to successfully shed Light on Obama’s darkness, but providing enough people pray, be victorious over him at the same time. Smart, holy, caring man (with a great family too).
remember he did the comment after 0’s state of the union? MSNBC tore up Jindal. ( I think it was the SOU ) I remember Chrissy saying how tiny he looked and such, was appalled by that. MSNBC appalls me on a regular basis though!
Sixty-three percent of the voters surveyed approved of Jindal, a Republican who’s been in office since 2008 and is running for re-election next year.
President Barack Obama had far less support from voters in the poll, with 37 percent saying they approve of him.
:)
The MSM damaged Palin and are already saying she will lose because she quit Alaska. I know it is bull crap but it just is. The key is that last I heard independents are not happy with Palin. I get flamed for saying this outright.
Jindal can’t be touched by the MSM. Jindal with Palin or Blackburn, Bachmann or Christie or Lt. Col. Allen West are worthy thought right now. The Independents want fiscal responsibility in economics brfore social conservatism like it or not. To Palin’s defense she rocks on energy and all issues and I don’t believe the polls that have Obama beating her.So I agree with you...McCain ruined Palin.
But all is still open...
And double the number of 'birther' blogs.
LOL Jindal is not Obama he won’t have his life records sealed. The MSM would not tolerate anyone but a dem doing this.
I forgot to add Rubio to the list.
Also If Christie makes the DNC nervous they will be petrified of this worthy man.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2626001/posts
remember he did the comment after 0’s state of the union? MSNBC tore up Jindal. ( I think it was the SOU ) I remember Chrissy saying how tiny he looked and such, was appalled by that. MSNBC appalls me on a regular basis though!Oh, indeed I remember, but anyone who has heard Jindal speak in regard to the oil spill, knows they have someone to fear. The man is an incredible speaker (as you well know) with so much heart and fervor for that which is good. The MSNBC crowd is going to be peeing in their pants if he runs for POTUS.
Yeah but according to the birthers on here, he's not eligible because you must have two U.S. citizen parents to be natural-born, 14th amendment be damned. Surely you're aware of that.
Oh I know. And I imagine his dual citizenship may cause them some heartburn as well.
Jindal in 2010 refused to endorse Senator Vitter, who defeated the Democrat Charlie Melancon by a larger percent than Jindal won in 2007.
Don’t take your kids on vacation to a country or else they’ll magically lose their U.S. citizenship and obtain the citizenship of that other country.
If they're born there they could wind up with dual citizenship. Depends on where we're talking about.
Someone is a natural-born U.S. citizen if they are born on U.S. soil because of the 14th amendment. You can also be a natural-born U.S. citizen if you are born abroad to one or two U.S. citizen parents that meet the guidelines. But that's not explicitly written in the 14th.
What is so complicated about that? How come people can't understand it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.