Posted on 11/10/2010 7:17:02 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
Ahhhh, but the P2V Neptune..... Now THAT was an ASW patrol plane!
ping
Just watched one take-off and do a couple touch-and-gos this morning. Beautiful bird in the air with a great range, long flight time, and adaptability.
When as they come up with a better replacement for the P-3, the P-3 is toast.
This is not apt to happen any time soon.
Well I live on flight path over NAS Jacksonville...and I don’t know which number of Orion the Navy flies out of there, but I sure enjoy watching them. I guess it’s kind of the trhow back to another era.
Freegards,
Lex
Don’t forget the Hoover (S-3 Viking)!
Oh, I wonder if the new 737 can lope along on one engine the way the P-3 loiters on 2 props, at low altitude, in the salty sea air ...
Time will tell.
They do touch and goes here in SE Georgia too. I work very close to the flightline and they are an awesome sight!
Lest we forget the "Stoof", here's a photo:
Apparently there is a Neptune in the bottom of a freshwater lake in the Seattle Area and the Navy will not let aviation buffs pull it up and restore it.
Used to watch these take off and land up at Brunswick NAS!
Before the Navy left Moffett Field (Mountain View, CA), squadrons of P-3Bs would take off and fly right over our house on their way to ASW duty in the Pacific. The whole house would shake, vibrate and buzz. Maintenance on the planes would require they sit on the runway with engines at full throttle for what seemed like hours on end, blanketing the entire south bay in noise.
Great bird, but it is nice not having to listen to them anymore.
I am not an expert but a quick look at the spects shows that the ‘737’ has a longer range by 350 miles and can stay on station an hour longer than the P-3.
Mike
Except for that whole "wings about to fall off" thing.
I believe the specs, to a point ...
Turboprops are inherently more efficient at low altitudes. Perhaps the P-8 can carry a LOT more fuel, and thus has a longer patrol/loiter radius.
Perhaps new equipment and sensors will permit the P-8 to putz around at a nice fuel efficient 25,000 ft.
And perhaps the days of flying below the scud, in the rain and snow, actually LOOKING OUT THE WINDOW are over.
dunno.
Paint me anachronistic ;-)
Composite, so corrosion would be much less of a problem.
STOL, so with folding wings you could even get in on/off a flat top.
Burt Rutan's ATTT
The Model 133-4.62 ATTT proof-of-concept demonstrator is a 62% scaled version of an airplane designed to challenging STOL and long range requirements. The ATTT was developed and test flown by Scaled under contract to DARPA.
http://www.scaled.com/projects/advanced_technology_tactical_transport_attt
I grew up in the South Bay, and P3s flying over every five minutes was part of the daily routine.
Not ASW, but neat, nonetheless!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.