Skip to comments.
Physicists Discover "Violation of a Fundamental Symmetry of the Universe"
i09.com ^
| November 3, 2010
| Staff
Posted on 11/04/2010 12:31:54 PM PDT by lbryce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 next last
To: lbryce
To: lbryce
In my parallel universe, we are asymmetric but equal.
To: DocRock
Saturn's North Pole Hexagon
![](http://www.dennishollingsworth.us/archives/image/SaturnNASA_AP_468x397.jpg)
63
posted on
11/04/2010 1:40:36 PM PDT
by
lbryce
(Obama Notwithstanding, America's Best Days Are Yet To Be .)
To: lbryce
“sterile neutrinos” cannot reproduce.
Ergo they will eventually become extinct.
To: starlifter
65
posted on
11/04/2010 1:45:01 PM PDT
by
TexasPatriot1
("Tyranny is defined as that which legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry" Jefferson)
To: bunkerhill7
” sterile neutrinos cannot reproduce.
Ergo they will eventually become extinct. “
Nope - they’ll organize ‘Neutrino Pride Parades’ and demand that ‘Neutrino Appreciation’ be taught in the schools, so they can recruit more Neutrinos.....
66
posted on
11/04/2010 1:49:17 PM PDT
by
Uncle Ike
(Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
To: Aevery_Freeman
Funny and smart. Good combination. Takes one to know one, bud!
May the Schwartz be with you.
![](http://www.sfad.org/julia/blog/graphics/spaceballs.jpg)
![](http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2743/4175015880_cea9ebed9e_m.jpg)
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
67
posted on
11/04/2010 1:50:27 PM PDT
by
The Comedian
(I really missed you. Next time, I'll adjust for windage.)
To: lbryce
"The simplest explanation involves adding new neutrino-like particles, or sterile neutrinos, which do not have the normal weak interactions." Well, no.... the simplest explanations involve hardware, software, or measurement errors.
Just saying....
68
posted on
11/04/2010 1:53:39 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: Huebolt
This “travel at the speed of light” thing. The red shift is used to measure distances right? That means infrared must travel at a different speed than ultraviolet, and that is not getting into the other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum like x-ray or gamma rays. So what does speed of light mean since all the frequencies travel at different speeds? Maybe we could travel at the speed of red light and still not have infinite mass?
To: antiRepublicrat
"What do you get if you multiply six by nine"? "Six by nine. Forty two."
"That's it. That's all there is."
"I always thought something was fundamentally wrong with the universe."
I'm glad I read through the thread before I went and scrounged around for that quote.
70
posted on
11/04/2010 1:55:18 PM PDT
by
zeugma
(Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam)
To: lbryce
I wish they’d just bring back “ether” and be done with it.
To: lbryce
They really don’t have a clue.
To: Gadsden1st
” infinite mass? “
Is that a Michelle Obama reference???
73
posted on
11/04/2010 1:58:12 PM PDT
by
Uncle Ike
(Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
To: battlecry
Thanks for posting the article.
The phenomena as explained in your posted article does not address, account for the seemingly natural forces having created the six-sided geometric shape positioned on Saturn's north pole as seen in the images I recently posted.
74
posted on
11/04/2010 1:58:26 PM PDT
by
lbryce
(Obama Notwithstanding, America's Best Days Are Yet To Be .)
To: lbryce
That's exactly what a gas giant looks like just before a monolith at the pole ignites a sustained fusion reaction.
Probably a good idea to attempt no landings there.
![](http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2743/4175015880_cea9ebed9e_m.jpg)
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
75
posted on
11/04/2010 1:58:41 PM PDT
by
The Comedian
(I really missed you. Next time, I'll adjust for windage.)
To: Gadsden1st
The red shift is used to measure distances right? That means infrared must travel at a different speed than ultraviolet No.
For any wave, speed of propagation is equal to the wavelength times the frequency of the oscillation.
For light, it's
c = f * lambda
Where c = speed of light (constant), f = frequency, and lambda = wavelength.
The frequency for IR is lower than it is for UV. The wavelengths are correspondingly higher. The waves travel at the same speed.
76
posted on
11/04/2010 2:01:57 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: InternetTuffGuy
Haven’t heard of the zero popint field I see ... the ‘ether’ is so yesterday when you have zero point to refer to. Just dip your consciousness in the quantum foam and become enlightened don’tchaknow.
77
posted on
11/04/2010 2:03:08 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: InternetTuffGuy
Haven’t heard of the zero point field I see ... the ‘ether’ is so yesterday when you have zero point to refer to. Just dip your consciousness in the quantum foam and become enlightened don’tchaknow.
78
posted on
11/04/2010 2:03:21 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: r9etb
Couldn’t have wave packets otherwise ...
79
posted on
11/04/2010 2:04:34 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: The Comedian
![](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__wX94Pgmirc/SvB6uJ-_urI/AAAAAAAAAZA/eidVttCR6wk/s1600/dragon.jpg)
As long as they keep buying our bonds, I don't care.
80
posted on
11/04/2010 2:05:28 PM PDT
by
frithguild
(The Democrat Party Brand - Big Government protecting Entrenched Interests from Competition)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson