Posted on 10/20/2010 8:59:05 AM PDT by Colofornian
Nice caution. Well put.
I am sorry I have no idea who “Onada” is.
You are correct that Mitt Romney is a liberal.
I do not view him as personally dangerous to my family or myself and given the “choice” between him and Obama, I’d vote for him. You wouldn’t? Fine, I cannot quarrel with that decision since I did not vote for McCain in 2008.
Why?
Because I hate that sorry sack of *hit.
Onada is Spanish for Zero and it kind of rhymes with Obama.
I respect your voting decision. But Romney will only take us down the same Marxist path we’re on now—just more slowly and sneakily. So, IMHO, voting for him is really no different than voting for The Usurping Onada.
Your concern, I think, is that voting for a so-called third party would guarantee Onada’s reelection. That is probable. But if a significant number of those people who voted for Onada—indies, students and the just downright duped—vote for a third party person (or even write in a name)those votes will be denied Onada. Thus, if the Marxist residing in the WH gets less than 41% of the popular vote he has a mandate to do nothing. Also, I would expect that he would be facing a hostile Congress.
As I’ve said, voting for a RINO only begats more RINOs.
Oh, by the way, I agree with you on McBipartisan. Sadly I voted for him for exactly the same reason you’re proposing to vote for Romney.
If we always vote the lesser of two evils, evil wins no matter what.
“If we always vote the lesser of two evils, evil wins no matter what.”
So in the case of one evil (Obama) vs another evil (Romney) you choose Obama? Because I can understand that. I didn’t vote for McCain nor would I in a million years, I wouldn’t have cared who he was running against. I will not ever fault someone for their vote or lack of it, it’s your right to use how you see fit.
I’d just like to ask you if you don’t want a say in just how much evil is at the reigns of this nation. Because there is varying degrees of evil, and to most objective conservatives, Obama is Satan while Mitt is more of a low ranking NAZI SS officer. Still evil, and certainly not MY choice in the primary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.