Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krugman: We Need Up To $10 Trillion In QE
Seeking Alpha ^ | 10-15-2010 | Cullen Roche

Posted on 10/15/2010 6:57:02 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 10/15/2010 6:57:07 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Krugman is a crazy person.

I mean like delusional, hallucinatory crazy.


2 posted on 10/15/2010 7:00:36 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Character is defined by how we treat those who society says have no value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I knew guys with D averages in econ that could outthink this idiot.


3 posted on 10/15/2010 7:02:21 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Krugman believes if we print enough money to give every a million dollars, we all be rich


4 posted on 10/15/2010 7:02:21 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
Paul Krugman = Harry Reid = Squirrel Testicles
5 posted on 10/15/2010 7:05:34 PM PDT by taxcutisapayraise (Making Statism Unpopular)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Krugman needs 9 grams.


6 posted on 10/15/2010 7:06:28 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Pablo lives jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Krugman is nothing but an Obama/extreme leftist hack. Both of them would like it very much if $10T in federal debt were monetized just to say Obama got rid of the debt in time for the 2012 election. Who cares of the rest of “Rome” is buring to the ground, just like they did with the Porkulus.

I don’t even know why this man still has a job after being so completely wrong.


7 posted on 10/15/2010 7:09:08 PM PDT by dajeeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dajeeps

Neither Krugman nor Obama has a clue about what constitutes wealth.


8 posted on 10/15/2010 7:11:21 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

“Krugman is a crazy person.
I mean like delusional, hallucinatory crazy.”


After deep thought, and careful consideration, I have to conclude that you have arrived at the only logical, and indeed an inescapable and accurate conclusion.


9 posted on 10/15/2010 7:12:03 PM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Good grief... I am one in favor of additional QE (fight off deflation which, according to the analyst at the Atlanta Fed is at the highest probability of occurring than any tome in the post war economy) but $10 Trillion? That’s just nucking futs...


10 posted on 10/15/2010 7:14:12 PM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Good grief... I am one in favor of additional QE (fight off deflation which, according to the analyst at the Atlanta Fed is at the highest probability of occurring than any tome in the post war economy) but $10 Trillion? That’s just nucking futs...


11 posted on 10/15/2010 7:14:22 PM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Who do you suppose is going to get the 10 trillion?


12 posted on 10/15/2010 7:18:39 PM PDT by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Why not go all in?



Which will eventually lead to the dollar being like this...


13 posted on 10/15/2010 7:20:54 PM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch

One definition of insanity: When faced with two options, one being lower taxes (especially on businesses) and less regulation and the other option being monetizing the debt with 10T dollars....you go with #2.


14 posted on 10/15/2010 7:21:34 PM PDT by jdsteel (CONGRESS: Take it again in twenty ten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam

Krugman is an idiot. It’s always a safe bet to bet against him nomatter what he says.


15 posted on 10/15/2010 7:24:10 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Gold And Silver Best Protection Against The $100 Trillion Bailout
16 posted on 10/15/2010 7:24:17 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

What he’s REALLY saying is that we should renounce our debts, since most of it is in dollars - so by doubling or tripling the amount in circulation, you effectively reduce the real cost of the debt. It’s a form of default. Unfortunately, you also will cause imported goods (including oil) to double or triple in price, and domestic goods to increase by varying levels (related to their amount of imported content, starting from raw materials, and including labor). Savings accounts will be worth proportionally less, as will just about everything in dollars. People’s pay will not increase much, if at all, so basically we become a third-world country. On a personal level, ask yourself how you would do if everything you spent money on, say, doubled in price.

Having said that, this country will soon have to choose a path with regard to the debt and future obligations. We will either have to default (in some way), or actually try to pay down our debt. To do so will mean budget surpluses - and that means big changes - such as raising the retirement age to 72 years old, and quickly, for example. Or huge tax increases on the poor and middle class (like a VAT), as taxing the rich just slows the economy down and negates any benefits. They could (and may) go after private retirement accounts - with the worthless promise of an annuity. Or maybe some stuff that’s even worse, but I’ll leave that to your imagination.


17 posted on 10/15/2010 7:42:32 PM PDT by BobL (The whole point of being human is knowing when the party's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

$10 trillion??? Guy doesn’t have a clue of the money needed, try a quadrillion dollars to cover the debt involved. $10 trillion only covers interest.


18 posted on 10/15/2010 8:00:13 PM PDT by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Why do Mommy and Daddy spend $50,000 a year to have Biffy or Buffy go to Princeton to listen to total idiots like Krugman, or Blinder??

I’ll never know!


19 posted on 10/15/2010 8:02:41 PM PDT by Noob1999 (Where's Meg Whitman when we need her?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

QE = stealth tax (and an especially regressive one).
Why does Krugman hate the poor?


20 posted on 10/15/2010 8:44:32 PM PDT by Lorianne (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. ___ George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson