Posted on 10/13/2010 8:50:16 PM PDT by pissant
You must be a blast at parties.
October 11, 1979, Letter to Mr. Robert L. Mauro:
Dear Mr. Mauro:I hope you won't mind my writing you about a recent column of yours suggesting that I might be preparing to abandon my anti-abortion position and that I signed a permissive abortion bill while I was governor. I think there are things I should make plain here.
First, my position is that interrupting a pregnancy means the taking of a human life. In our Judeo-Christian tradition, that can only be done in self-defense. Therefore, I will agree to an abortion only to protect the life of the prospective mother.
Now, with regard to the permissive bill I supposedly signed, let me give you the correct history of what took place early in my term as governor. A bill was introduced that was permissive, indeed abortion on demand. Naturally, there was great controversy about this bill. The author finally sent word that he would amend his bill to anything the governor thought he could sign. Faced with this responsibility, I probably did more study and more soul searching on the subject than I had done on anything in my eight years as governor. I came to the conclusion, as I have already stated, that it could only be justified to save a human life. . . . Perhaps it was my inexperience in government, but like so many pieces of legislation, there were loopholes that I had not seen, and the thing that made the California abortion bill become somewhat permissive in nature was violation of the spirit of the legislation by the very groups who were supposed to police it. This was particularly true in the case of psychiatrists. If faced with the same problem today, I can assure you I would make sure there were no loopholes in the bill. Indeed, I have already written Congressman Hyde telling him of my support for his amendment.
Again, please rest assured there is no way I could or would change my position with regard to my opposition to the permissive abortion that is taking place throughout our land.
Sincerely,
Ronald Reagan
Thanks — I think I’ll pass. I don’t have the time to devote.
Can't.... stop... laughing. LOL
I haven’t had any other volunteers either. This could be a bloodbath. ;O)
FalconParty caucus...yuck yuck.
No, pissant thought you were calling Palin a loser. It’s called projection - a common affliction of PDS suffering leftdolts. (To be fair, on topics other than Palin, pissant is clearly not a leftdolt. Just pointing out the similarities on this topic.)
No, pissant thought you were calling Palin a loser. It’s called projection - a common affliction of PDS suffering leftdolts. (To be fair, on topics other than Palin, pissant is clearly not a leftdolt. Just pointing out the similarities on this topic.)
Maybe... kinda... sorta... uh...
Absolutely none. Nope. Not going to say a thing.
Wise choice!!
;) You betcha!
My lips hurt from pressing them together...
One good thing Sarah Palin has done is to support women in this year’s elections.
She’s going to need them if she is President Of The United States.
Margaret Thatcher was betrayed by the male anti-soverignty Europeanists of the Tories-the CINO’s when they deposed her from power in 1990.
The male RINO’s will be Sarah’s worst enemies on her way to the White House and when she finally gets there.
Did Thatcher bring down British socialized health care with a ‘death panels’ comment like Palin did here with Obama-care? Thatcher is no Palin.
“Early in the 2008 campaign, when John McCain’s aides discovered that Alaska-size gaps existed in Palin’s general knowledge (among those previously unreported: she had no idea who Margaret Thatcher was), they from time to time would give her some books to read in hopes of improving the candidate’s learning curve.”
Read More http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/10/sarah-palin-201010?printable=true#ixzz12LJ7zmmI
I think pissant is Wolf Blitzed.....
I bet they are members of the MSM!!!
Question:
Which is greater?
The number of homes your daughters will receive candy from on Trick or Treat night or the number of votes Duncan Hunter received in the 2008 GOP primaries?
That's vile, even for a Palin cultist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.