Posted on 10/13/2010 3:04:13 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
If you have questions about the birth announcements in The Star Bulletin and The Honolulu Advertiser, August 1961, check out the research at :
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth
Long read, but worth it. Also links to the follow up articles are included.
Lots of info there, posted by no other researcher or blogger. Have fun.
For your viewing pleasure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCyfCHTD0Ps
For your reading assignment:
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth
Have fun.
“God only knows what it will ever take to get fully reliable, accurate and authentic information that one could completely trust from them...”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Iy8i61DmAg
Now, in regards to the lack of confirmation of Obama’s online “Certification” of live birth (not a CERTIFICATE of live birth, commonly known as a birth CERTIFICATE)we will hear objections that Hawaii was protecting the”privacy” of Obama by not confirming that the document that he posted online, mirrored the records Hawaii had of said document.
However, how would that defend Obama’s “privacy” if he, himself (people under his direction and control) had placed the document with the obvious intention to be viewed by the public?
And further, if “privacy” were an issue, he could easily grant Hawaii permission to state that, in fact, said document mirrors the document(S)they have at the HDOH?
STE=Q
PS: Unfortunately “Polerick” is mentioned at the end of the vedio that he made a call to Hawaii etc.
Anything “Polerick” said can be discounted without destroying the worth of this video or my comments above.
“Polerick” does not hold sufficient credibility(IMO) to be relied on.
STE=Q
Polerick = Polarik
STE=Q
“...to grasp that they are completely unprofessional, dysfunctional, inconsistent and even contradictory.”
It is a government agency. That is what I expect - particularly from Hawaii. Think Democrat. Think Government. Expect incompetency that borders if it doesn’t cross into evil.
BTW - did some reading last night about Arkansas prisons in the 60s under the Democrats, and the “Duke of Duval” in Texas. It is more than a bit frightening.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Murton#Prison_scandal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Berham_Parr
Phil Berg - Obama Birth Certificate 1 of 6
Obama Presiidential Eligibility Rally - West Lawn, U.S. Capitol,10/23/10 - Attorney Philip J. Berg, www.obamacrimes.com a life-long democrat, member of the NAACP has lead the charge that Barrack Obama, aka Barry Soetoro is unqualified to be president of the U.S. for having failed to produce a birth certificate and other personal records that could prove or disprove that he is a natural born U.S. citizen, as mandated by the U.S. Constitution.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTbUPs8b7bY&feature=player_embedded#at=353
SNL spoofing zero tonight, campaigning for Harry
Reid, who claims he needs distance from him, doesn’t
know him very well .. and then after a few more
distancing remarks, he gets up to the mike and
starts with
“if you were born in this country, why don’t
you release your birth cert ?”
Zero answers: ‘You’re right .. I should’
LOL .. they’re either twisting the knife in
deeper or punking the public about it. Talk about
weirdness.
Placemark for gotta read.
Pinging you both to an extremely importnat post by Spaulding about voting fraud.
The data shown in Nordyke long form birth certificates destroys your explanation: They were signed by the attending physician on August 11th at Kapiolani, sent to the DoH office on the same date, and the DoH assigned numbers 10637 and 10638 on the same date.
Had Obama’s certificate been sent on the same day with the rest of birth certificates from Kapiolani for that week, his Date Filed date would have been August 11 or a later date, if a lazy DoH worker took time processing it.
It is obvious that either the Date Filed or registration number shown on Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery.
My bet is on forged registration number - otherwise there would be no need for DoH to refuse the release of birth index in case when request included both: Obama’s name and registration number 10645.
Newspaper announcements are easy to explain: Obama's birth was registered by a relative (most likely grandmother) as an unattended birth.
You have quoted an obvious lie by gov. Lingle: There is no press-release mentioning Kapiolani as Obama's birthplace.
Numerous direct questions to Hawaii DoH to confirm that they issued COLB to Obama on June 6, 2007 have been ignored.
The denials I've seen have been based on 338-18 part b, with no mention of the UIPA. Feel free to show otherwise. You suggested they interpret the part of the UIPA that I quoted differenty from what it says, but you haven't actually shown this to be the case.
The denials I've seen have been based on 338-18 part b, with no mention of the UIPA. Feel free to show otherwise. You suggested they interpret the part of the UIPA that I quoted differenty from what it says, but you haven't actually shown this to be the case.
I saw that skit too. I thought that was odd they would bring it up ... especially without it being attributed to a right-wing extremist/tea party member. This gives the issue legitimacy, because honestly, there’s no reason for Obama to withhold an original if the alleged COLB is authentic and accurate.
Very interesting the way that is worded.
Because it was the Founders' intent that only eligible people would run for the office, not people like Roger Calero or BO.
39th Congress..debating giving citizenship after War Between the States
“There is another class of persons well recognized, not only in our constitutional history, but also by the laws of nations, who are not foreigners, who occupy an intermediate position, and that intermediate position is defined by the laws of nations by the word ‘ subjects.’
“intermediate”..this throws out subjects equal to natural born citizens...
Don't know about the rest of the stuff in your letter.
That is begging the question,” Mr. Clark replied.
” I wanted to find why a negro was not a citizen, if the gentleman would tell me. If he would lay down his definition, I wanted to see whether the negro did not comply with it and conform to it, so as to be a citizen; but he insists that he is not a citizen.”
” I will answer that question, if the honorable Senator will permit me,” said Mr. Davis.
” Government is a political partnership. No persons but the partners who formed the partnership are parties to the government. Here, is a government formed by the white man alone. The negro was excluded from the formation of our political partnership; he had nothing to do with it; he had nothing to do in its formation.”
“Is it a close corporation, so that new partners can not be added ?” asked Mr. Stewart, of Nevada.
” Yes, sir,” said Mr. Davis; “ it is a close white corporation. You may bring all of Europe, but none of Asia and none of Africa into our partnership.”
39th Congress debates.
.........The law license part is not accurate.
says who?
Here’s the skit I’d like to see on SNL.......
A young man goes into the DMV to apply for a driver’s license and when the clerk asks for proof of identity the man tells him “I forgot to bring my birth certificate with me but it’s posted in the internet” and proceeds to show the clerk his birth certificate on his Face Book page. When the clerk refuses to accept that as proof of identity the young man says “Why not? It worked for Obama”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.