Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2 Rutgers Freshmen Charged Making Sex Tape Of Student (The young man killed himself)
PIX Channel 11 NJ ^ | 9-29-2010 | ARTHUR CHI'EN and SHELLEY NG

Posted on 09/29/2010 11:19:14 AM PDT by Frantzie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 521-523 next last
To: DJ MacWoW

Because the law, which is in place, says the student who killed himself did, in fact, have a reasonable expectation of privacy while he was having sex.

The court will pass sentence on those who violated that expectation.


301 posted on 09/29/2010 5:08:42 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Breaking agreements isn’t a basic immorality? OK.


302 posted on 09/29/2010 5:10:15 PM PDT by TigersEye (Defend liberty. Destroy socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
They will be prosecuted for taping and distributing the tape.

You go ahead and ignore the immorality of all 3 of them. And don't worry, this WILL be the left's new homosexual talking point. He'll be the new Matthew Shepard as has been pointed out.

303 posted on 09/29/2010 5:12:20 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Breaking agreements isn’t a basic immorality? OK.

Your post 296: I am not the one expecting them to not have sex.

You're going to now lecture on morality? OK..

304 posted on 09/29/2010 5:14:32 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: pissant
They aren’t responsible for his death.

Maybe not directly responsible, but definitely culpable.

305 posted on 09/29/2010 5:14:50 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I am not lecturing I was asking. Is your reading comprehension that pathetic? /rhetorical question


306 posted on 09/29/2010 5:16:22 PM PDT by TigersEye (Defend liberty. Destroy socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I’m not ignoring the immorality of what they’ve done.

My posts to you have simply been illustrating the foolishness of your assumptions.

You still don’t want to admit that the mere recording was/is illegal.


307 posted on 09/29/2010 5:18:47 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I believe Jesus would have looked upon this young man with compassion, love and mercy.. and looked upon his suicide with pain. The Pharisees would have looked upon him with self-righteous judgement.

-——Now it happened, as Jesus sat at the table in the house, that behold, many tax collectors and sinners came and sat down with Him and His disciples. And when the Pharisees saw it, they said to His disciples, “Why does your Teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?” When Jesus heard that, He said to them, “Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. “But go and learn what this means: ‘I desire mercy and not sacrifice.’ For I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance” (Matthew 9:10-13 NKJV).


308 posted on 09/29/2010 5:19:21 PM PDT by Tamzee (OBAMA ---- ALL SHAM, NO WOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamzee

“many tax collectors and sinners “

But I repeat myself...


309 posted on 09/29/2010 5:22:13 PM PDT by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle; TigersEye
Are you serious? These were college kids making a verbal agreement with a wink and a nod, not attorneys signing legal contracts. You need to ease up on the hyperbole.

Because the law, which is in place, says the student who killed himself did, in fact, have a reasonable expectation of privacy while he was having sex.

A reasonable expectation of privacy in a shared dorm room? Is it a reasonable expectation for him to commit suicide because his reasonable expectation of privacy was violated?

Do we know for a fact that he was actually having sex? Maybe I'm naive but it said he was "making out". Just asked my 20 year old daughter if that meant having sex and she said no, just kissing and stuff. So we don't even know if there were actual sex acts occurring.

Does anyone know - has anyone actually seen the video?

310 posted on 09/29/2010 5:22:54 PM PDT by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
You still don’t want to admit that the mere recording was/is illegal.

I have never ONCE stated that it wasn't illegal. And I have NEVER said that it was ok to do. You came into the middle of a conversation and have seriously misunderstood what was said.

My original post was that it was NAIVE for him to expect privacy in a shared dorm room. You have morphed that into something that I did NOT say. You can check my posting history.

311 posted on 09/29/2010 5:24:17 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Shethink13

So you don’t think agreements are worth anything. Fine. I do.


312 posted on 09/29/2010 5:25:33 PM PDT by TigersEye (Defend liberty. Destroy socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I am not lecturing I was asking. Is your reading comprehension that pathetic? /rhetorical question

That's it? You impugn my reading comprehension when trying to justify that you think college sexcapades are fine but, by golly they need PRIVACY?!

313 posted on 09/29/2010 5:29:46 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: Shethink13
A reasonable expectation of privacy in a shared dorm room?

He was in the room with one other person, the person he was making out with, or having sex with, whatever it was.

He had a a reasonable, and more importantly in this case, a legal expectation of privacy.

That part of this case is black and white.

314 posted on 09/29/2010 5:32:19 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
...when trying to justify that you think college sexcapades are fine ...

Knowing your posting history this is exactly what I expected from you. Putting words in my mouth. ie lying.

315 posted on 09/29/2010 5:33:48 PM PDT by TigersEye (Defend liberty. Destroy socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
I have never ONCE stated that it wasn't illegal.

That's accurate, you convieniently didn't answer that part.

316 posted on 09/29/2010 5:34:17 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Knowing your posting history this is exactly what I expected from you. Putting words in my mouth. ie lying.

Can you back that up? I quoted you.

Post 296 : I am not the one expecting them to not have sex.

317 posted on 09/29/2010 5:37:23 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Again, you need to check my posting history. What did you think I was talking about when I stated, more than once, that there were 3 young people that behaved immorally?

I have never given the two who taped the young man a pass. If you insist otherwise, post the quote with a link where you think that I did.

318 posted on 09/29/2010 5:41:03 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: Shethink13; Balding_Eagle; TigersEye

They don’t want to discuss anything. They want to argue and accuse. They are simply looking for a fight.


319 posted on 09/29/2010 5:42:48 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
He was in the room with one other person, the person he was making out with, or having sex with, whatever it was.

He had a a reasonable, and more importantly in this case, a legal expectation of privacy.

That part of this case is black and white.

That's just nonsense. You sound like an ACLU attorney.

320 posted on 09/29/2010 5:46:08 PM PDT by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 521-523 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson