Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Would be very helpful to know the honest reason.
1 posted on 09/18/2010 3:06:33 PM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: STARWISE

I suspect that it is personally worse for Karl Rove, not out of just pettiness on his part, but because O’Donnell ruined his *system*. And that cuts deep.

His own fault, really, because he made the mistake of emotionally investing in a “horse race”. He thought his system of prediction was so perfect that it was a *certainty* that O’Donnell would lose.

This is worse than him just taking a hit to his credibility. Some men become so invested in their “system”, that if it is broken, they even commit suicide. The trauma to them is that great.

And this isn’t just a loss. With her win, his system is shattered. Even if he is resilient enough to patch it back together and press on, he will never again have total confidence in it. If he isn’t resilient, personally, he might retire.

But he will never forgive her for doing this.


30 posted on 09/18/2010 3:26:46 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

I found this article earlier today that shows how emotionally invested many in the party were with Castle running.
http://www.wboc.com/Global/story.asp?S=11297477


31 posted on 09/18/2010 3:27:10 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
We have learned a number of things about Karl Rove.

He is not to be taken out in presentable company.

He seems to be nothing more than just a political street thug.

OBTW Rove was the architect for Castle's campaign.

A fully discredited Obama RINO


34 posted on 09/18/2010 3:28:22 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Could the reason be because Rove is a progressive like Castle?..


35 posted on 09/18/2010 3:29:35 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
2008 was a trend change of higher magnitude than any living person has ever experienced. Most don't comprehend how broadly, deeply and profoundly the world has already changed, and certainly only dimly perceive (and fear) how different the world will be in just a few short years.

The survival of western civilization is at stake. It may lose.

37 posted on 09/18/2010 3:31:18 PM PDT by sourcery (Don't call them "liberals" or "progressives." The honest label is extreme anti-Constitutionalists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
...but O'Donnell is clearly the movement's most attractive, shiniest, and most unlikely star.

Beg to differ on that point!

40 posted on 09/18/2010 3:32:46 PM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
Well, there are other stories, quoting former campaign aides to O'Donnell. And we all recall the McCain campaign aides who blamed the election loss on Gov. Palin. All of these former aides are looking for their next job and campaigns like O'Donnell's and Palin's are a threat to their livelihood.

All the good conservatives who've been elected already have their people on speed dial. Some folks are still out in the cold and they are afraid. Could you imagine if one were able to run 90 percent of a campaign from Facebook and YouTube?

42 posted on 09/18/2010 3:33:22 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

This is wrong IMO. And it doesn’t include Kristol and Krauthammer, both of whom objected. Her sex harassment lawsuit against her Conservative employer seems to be driving it. Unless of course it’s loyalty to Castle which would be awful.


44 posted on 09/18/2010 3:34:34 PM PDT by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

It only took an instant for other party leaders like Rush Limbaugh and Michelle Malkin to flip out right back at him. But why did Rove take this tack? It's not because he's not into right-wingers.

Rush Limbaugh and Michelle Malkin are not party leaders. This article is yet another attempt to lie to the public by a LEFTist infection at the "Business Insider" .


45 posted on 09/18/2010 3:36:51 PM PDT by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

It’s because Rove is part of the Republican Establishment, and a tool of that establishment. One of their goals is to nominate Romney, as others have pointed out here.

Another goal that they’ve been working on since 1998 is to make the Republican Party a clone of the Democrats. Thats why they use “The Establishment Rule” for selecting candidates, which is to always select the leftmost one.

The Establishment also uses tools like Rove and Krauthammer to attempt to control conservative Republicans. This is why all of a sudden all sorts of columnists like Krauthammer began talking about the “Buckley Rule”. That rule is really means “All Republicans must vote for candidates which the Establishment chooses”. So the Establishment is (arrogantly) telling us that we are bad, bad children for voting for O’Donnell instead of Castle.


48 posted on 09/18/2010 3:38:47 PM PDT by Siegfried X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Politics has become a profession - not citizen representation.

With the growth of government - just like the auto industry - there are *side industries*. (car insurance, highways, gasoline, auto repair, tire dealers and marketing)

What we see with Karl Rove is a marketing expert - much like the article claims.

This also explains why the GOP has lost its way...government has so many departments and employees - it is too big to fire.


50 posted on 09/18/2010 3:40:22 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Despair; man's surrender. Laughter; God's redemption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Rove was off his meds?


51 posted on 09/18/2010 3:40:53 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Hey Karl...

We don’t want your boy Romney either...we want REAL people like Sarah and Miller and O’Donnell - who don’t need ‘king makers’ to package them.

They just need to be themselves - and we like that.

Retire while you still have some dignity left.


52 posted on 09/18/2010 3:41:53 PM PDT by maine-iac7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Here’s my thought - Rove has been selling us “liberal-lite” RINOism for a decade now. He pushed Bush on us, and never defended Bush when he did defy the left. He’s in the same corner with this leftist, and he hasn’t made much noise at all about the communist that now resides in the White House, nor has he blasted Pelosi, Reid, or the rest of the leftists that so desperately deserve it. Likewise, he’s never said a nasty word about Snowe, Collins, Graham, or any of the other liberals masquerading as Republicans.

Nope - he saves all his nasty criticism for the conservative candidate that has the gall to garner more votes than his RINO pick. He’s losing the electorate, and he knows it. The conservatives majority is no longer with him. His gig is up.

I think he’s been trying to steer the US towards a one-world government, not by drawing others to the great constitutional republican form of government that the US has enjoyed, but by molding the US to match the governments of Europe.


65 posted on 09/18/2010 3:57:46 PM PDT by meyer (Tax the productive to carry the freeloaders - What is it with democrats and slavery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

I think the most likely reason is nothing deep or nefarious. He’s probably friends with Castle.

He also wants the GOP to win the majority and sincerely believes that Castle’s loss is detrimental to those chances. A lot of people believe the same thing.


68 posted on 09/18/2010 4:02:38 PM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

It turned me off to Rove forever. There is no getting around the fact that his star is fading forever because of this.


78 posted on 09/18/2010 4:13:23 PM PDT by AdaGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

Rove, Crist, Murkowski, and Castle need to start their own party. I’m betting it draws more from the Dems than the GOP.


84 posted on 09/18/2010 4:21:10 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

“Strategists”, “Handlers”, “Architects”, “Insiders”.... Sarah Palin DESPISES them like a ‘Mama Grizzly’ despises intruders into her den.


86 posted on 09/18/2010 4:22:20 PM PDT by LibFreeUSA (Show me what Obama brought that was new and there you will find things only radical and destructive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

He has Chron’s disease?


103 posted on 09/18/2010 5:21:15 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE
It's not because he's not into right-wingers.

Barf. Since when is backing big-government moderate Dubya "being into right-wingers?"

115 posted on 09/18/2010 5:57:48 PM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson