Posted on 08/26/2010 11:25:12 AM PDT by FreeManDC
Is that what I said?
I believe gays should have the rights of heteros.
Then you have a problem. Those that push the homosexual agenda on FR are being banned by the owner.
And "gays" do have the same rights as everyone else. What they want are special rights based on aberrant behavior.
Yes, we in the military loved Bush as the CIC. We are equally despising of the current pres - - ent occupying the white hut.
I believe that “two consenting” adults who love each other should have the capacity for legal marriage.
Oh the horror to such a view. Sheesh! :(
I am sorry if this conflicts with freepers definition of what is normal behavior. My “view” and it is the CORRECT VIEW, :), is that homosexuality is NOT A CHOICE. Let me be clear, TO ACT on it, is a choice. To have an attraction to the same sex is not.
For example, let's say you are a “straight” male ok?
Is this your choice?? If it is, than you must also find men equally attractive and you happen to “choose” the female gender.
If you tell me, “No way, Jose!” I love women, I am ONLY attractive to women.”
Then you admit you do not have a “choice” in the matter of attraction.
The exact same is held for homosexuals. If you do have a choice, they too, must also have no choice in their attraction.
Man, why is this so difficult to explain to some people?
Wait I know, because it DIRECTLY conflicts with their beliefs in their particular religion.
Your turn! :)
Purpleporter’s correction,
_______________________________________________________
If you tell me, “No way, Jose!” I love women, I am ONLY attracted to women.”
Then you admit, you do not have a “choice” in the matter of attraction.
The exact same is held for homosexuals. If you do NOT have a choice, they too, must also have no choice in their attraction.
Nice!
Pretty old for homosexuals.
A marriage is the basis for creating a family. Two of the same cannot mate. It is impossible. Therefore it is NOT a union in any sense of the term.
My “view” and it is the CORRECT VIEW, :), is that homosexuality is NOT A CHOICE.
It is a mental illness. It is their choice to embrace their illness.
The exact same is held for homosexuals. If you do have a choice, they too, must also have no choice in their attraction.
Heterosexual attraction is normal. A man lusting after another man's hairy butt is not. And it is a choice as people have successfully been cured of their illness.
And then there's this:
FR is a conservative site. We do not appreciate our members fighting against us on our conservative values and issues. If you wish to support homosexual marriage or homosexuals in the military or hate crimes against us for speaking out against government promotion of homosexuality that’s your business, but you’d better do it somewhere else and not on FR. If you value your posting privileges, that is. FR is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-marriage, pro-military, pro-traditional American conservatism and it is a privilege to post here. Those who support the godless liberal/Marxist destruction of our free society and our country are free to exercise their free speech rights elsewhere. I won’t stand in your way.
Thanks. I added the Bush pics today.
I believe that lesbians live longer because they are not as promiscuous, or as likely to engage in sexual behaviours that tend to result in HIV transmission, as male homosexuals.
Dude!, Where did I say I am ok with this?
Again, every time YOU LOSE a point in the discussion, you make up something that I wrote. Please don't change the subject this time and address my question of choice. Otherwise, I am waisting my time.
MY BROTHERS were ATTACKED by a PEDOPHILE PRIEST. Homosexuals, TWO consenting ADULTS in their privacy of their own home is NOT the same.
Sheesh, PLEASE address my points of CHOICE and YOUR CHOICE to be “straight”.
Dude, respond to the information given.
That’s what gays do.
And that’s what you ARE defending.
Your brothers were attacked by a GAY.
You don’t pass the “sniff” test. You claim that you/your brothers were molested by a homosexual priest, then you back the homosexual agenda. Sounds like more lying to me.
**************************
I don't agree, but even if we were to put that aside, they do have a choice in their behaviour.
However, knowing what I know personally about a family member, as well as what others have posted here, I am convinced that it is a choice.
Your brothers were attacked by a GAY.
_________________________________________
A GAY PEDOPHILE!
Like Michael Jackson and John wayne gasey!
Now there are three sets of PEDOS, “straight” pedos, the ones who attack the opposite sex, BI-PEDOS, the ones whoa attack both, and homo pedos, the ones who attack their own sex.
NOW stop diverting my points on choice.
Answer my previous question on your “choice” of gender attraction.
Or I am done with your lack of arguments.
“A GAY PEDOPHILE!”
So why are you pushing the homosexiual agenda and empowering them to go after MORE children?
Are you saying that the Priest in question, who “attacked” two boys, is not a homosexual? What is he, then?
They all enjoy perverted sex and you want to give one group special rights. No thanks.
NOW stop diverting my points on choice.
Don't like the truth?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.