Posted on 08/20/2010 7:42:46 AM PDT by Willie Green
There is an Enterprise rent-a-car over on Elm, that would probably be about a mile away from the station.
Correction, hwy 80 knocks off 15 miles..
Still when you get to the Dallas train station, I dont think there are any car rentals and you need to be packing in that part of town, which might be hard to do after riding the Gubmint Train.
You've got to be kidding.
Dallas' Union Station is a very clean and well maintained facility that's a downtown Dallas Landmark and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. It offers a variety of options for local transportation, including transfer to DART light rail and Trinity Railway Express. There are also 18 hotels and 3 car rentals nearby. Or I'm sure you could also hail a taxi in downtown Dallas if that's what you would prefer.
As an interesting bit of trivia, Wolfgang Puck's catering service also occupies a portion of Union Station. Wolfgang has one of his famous celebrity restaurants in the nearby landmark Reunion Tower. So this is NOT an unsafe part of town like you falsely imply.
Still would need good track shoes, kevlar vest and a couple of “un” concealed pistolas.
This thing ain’t gonna happen and if the gubmint wastes money on, few will ever ride.
I’m right there with you. I make the trip twice a week and even though Texas Eagle tickets are only around $30, it isn’t worth it for the extra time and PITA trying to get around Dallas once I’m there.
85 is pretty normal on I20,
So what other laws do you routinely ignore?
Daily Willie Green Choo-Choo thread.
Promoting 19th Century technology for the 21st Century.
It would take an hour to list.
NOT an unsafe part of town like you falsely imply.
Oh Willie, you are right, but only 8 to 5 Monday thru Friday. Betcha we wouldn’t be catchin our friend Willie down there after dark, at least not still in possession of his wallet.
8-5 M-F you are harassed by people selling roses and character drawers on the street corners (albeit, I’m friends with one of the latter).
I wouldn’t want to walk to Elm from Commerce at night. I love Deep Ellum, but I am not going to pretend it is safe at night.
Tax revenue. Iron fist transit.
“If its high speed rail, it wont be stopping in every little town along the way.”
That’s the problem with government run rail systems. The politicians cannot keep their hands, and their purely political interests, off the eventual operating framework of the system. Locations of stations, time schedules and fares all become manipulated to obtain or keep the support of the politicians; resulting in systems that can never be self-supporting without permanent continuing taxpayer funded subsidies.
by Athena D. Merritt
Philadelphia Business Journal
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Ridership reached a record 1.27 million trips on Amtraks Keystone Line between Harrisburg and Philadelphia last fiscal year, state Transportation Secretary Allen D. Biehler said Monday.
From July 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010, ridership totaled 1.277 million, which was a 3.9 percent increase over the previous fiscal years 1.229 million trips.
Pennsylvania completed $145 million in improvements along the 104-mile line, which runs between New York and Harrisburg by way of Philadelphia, in 2006 through a joint effort with Amtrak and the Federal Transit Administration. The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation launched a website to promote ridership on the Keystone Line in August 2008.
The "Keystone Line", which uses the Keystone Corridor but is not synonymous with it, is basically a commuter line.
People aren't using it to go from Harrisburg to New York but from Downingtown and Exton to Philadelphia, and from Metro Park, N.J. to NYC too, I suppose.
As someone else has pointed out, commuter rail is antithetical to high-speed inter-city bullet trains.
I don't think anyone has an issue with maintaining commuter rail in crowded urban areas where it has been in use for a century-plus albeit getting the government out of it and making it profit-oriented rather than government-job oriented would certainly be desirable.
Actually, rather than high-speed bullet trains it very well may be smarter to end service at Coatesville or Parkesburg with more trains running rather than keep the line open to Harrisburg which very well may be for based more on politcs rather than what people want.
Actually, rather than high-speed bullet trains it very well may be smarter to end service at Coatesville or Parkesburg with more trains running rather than keep the line open to Harrisburg which very well may be for based more on politcs rather than what people want.
That would be silly. Over ½ million passengers embark/disembark at Harrisburg every year. (source)
IOW, if people want the Harrisburg stop and profit could be made from it then the Harrisburg stop would be kept, right? :-)
More riders = more revenue
That is true.
OTOH, more tracks, more trains, more stations, more conductors, engineers etc. = more expenses.
If revenue > expense, that is good.
If not, a point will be reached where it is time to cut bait.
Unless, of course, the government gets involved, which means that money that would go for things people want (as per choices made with money they earn) will got to things people don't want (as per money taken from what the earn via taxes)
Look, I’m sorry that Daddy didn’t buy you that train set you wanted so bad, but get over it already.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.