Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christian Conservative Leader Calls for No More Mosques in U.S.
CBS ^ | 8/12/10 | Stephanie Condon

Posted on 08/12/2010 6:32:08 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: VanDeKoik

Greece actually technically prohibits mosques. (those that are there are “illegal”)

then again in 1821 they actually fought the ottomans for freedom.


41 posted on 08/12/2010 7:16:44 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: True_Kon

I agree that the issue at stake here is not the first amendment but a radical, VIOLENT theocracy HIDING BEHIND “religion”. The sooner we shout this off the rooftops and get people to understand that it is NOT a religion MUCH LESS a RELIGION OF PEACE this will be the first victory in our war against ISLAMOFACISM>


42 posted on 08/12/2010 7:17:30 PM PDT by princess leah (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

Thanks for the kind words. Permitting a theocracy to build an ops center (mosque) at ground zero would have been like letting the cold war KGB have an office wing at the White House.

It’s insanity.


43 posted on 08/12/2010 7:19:11 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Yes, it's a cause for war, but on Muslim countries, not on Americans. It's not FR-PC to say so, but there are Americans who themselves "Muslim" but practice something quite different from actual Islam (which is evil and lethal). It's almost like certain people on FR would rather drive these people to the point of actually becoming our enemies than treat them like human beings. How is that going to make us safer? It would be much more effective to restrict emigration from Muslim countries than to mess with the First Amendment. What makes you think terrorists are going to comply with our laws, anyway?
44 posted on 08/12/2010 7:21:32 PM PDT by Julia H. (Freedom of speech and freedom from criticism are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
I'm with you.

Obviously the righteous thing to do is allow muslims to build mosques to their heart content all over the land of the free and import radical imams to rail against the Dhimmi & preach the virtues of Sharia.

Theres no reason we can't live side by side.

45 posted on 08/12/2010 7:21:47 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Thanks for the kind words. Permitting a theocracy to build an ops center (mosque) at ground zero would have been like letting the cold war KGB have an office wing at the White House.

The White House is becoming more like the KGB with each passing day.
46 posted on 08/12/2010 7:22:53 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: xzins; All

I agree with you. I would like to know why Islam “qualifies” as a religion.

It seems to me that any set of “ideas” that are based on some “leader” calling for followers to murder others, stone people, mutilate little girls’ genitals, extort money from non-followers, etc. should not be called a religion.

Any more than Jim Jones or Charles Manson followers should be able to get status as a religion. What if the Mayans decided to claim “religious status”, and the right to cut peoples’s hearts out, or toss virgins into volcanos... do we have to accept this kind of barbarism?


47 posted on 08/12/2010 7:22:55 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jacquej

There is no doubt that the Founders had a Judeo-Christian culture in mind....certainly not Mayan, or Wahabbist, or Socialist.


48 posted on 08/12/2010 7:27:11 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: I_Like_Spam

But what we certainly can and should do is to put real limits on the number of muslim immigrants and visitors...

***********

It should have been limited to zero on 9/12/2001. Furthermore, every non-citizen Muslim should have been deported immediately. I will never understand why that wasn’t done.


49 posted on 08/12/2010 7:40:53 PM PDT by Hepsabeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xzins

You are bang on the money!

Their theocracy takes hold in every mosque cultivating themes of overthrowing the government wherever they are. In essence they are political enemies of state and should be treated as such, outlawed and disbanded. They are entirely against freedom, rights and contrary to what America stands for and they should not be tolerated.

They are not a religion, but a imperialistic control cult.They have 1400 years of history to support that argument.
Here is an example
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IstZSgniH8
Thus its easy to say that 9-11 had NOTHING to do with America and its foreign policy ~~or George Bush


50 posted on 08/12/2010 7:54:29 PM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dgkb

“They are not a peaceful ‘religion’.”

Islam is not a religion period. It is a death cult.


51 posted on 08/12/2010 7:57:36 PM PDT by Bluebeard16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Ok how about we let them build it and then fly a plane into it?


52 posted on 08/12/2010 8:02:50 PM PDT by Bluebeard16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Bluebeard16

I don’t know about you, but i don’t think it’s good for any of us to suggest violence like that. We will be exactly like them.


53 posted on 08/12/2010 8:13:00 PM PDT by paudio (She wanted to be known as the second Jackie O. Instead, people see her another Marie Antoinette)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: hillarys cankles

Mayor Bloombutt, do enjoy your moment in the sunshine of “tolerance;” for your career of political expedience is now guaranteed a short life.

Know too, that if this monument to murderous treachery is built, it will be raized within weeks. You may bet on it.

In fact, there would be no surprise to discover that those who contract to erect this monument to horror will themselves suffer all manner of “accidents” on the job-site; and thus the “controversial” Imam will never actually realize the completion of his damnable acre of Hell.

Mayor Bloombutt, what you do not understand—chiefly because you are an self-important, ignorant and obstinate fool—is that those who advocate this vile effrontery to American sensibilities have signed a declaration of war against the common American citizen. There will be engagement and serious consequences, even if you choose to pretend otherwise

Mayor Bloombutt, you are indeed clueless to the ragged wound you have callously reopened. In siding with the caliphate of Islam, you assume the identity of the those who brought the terror of September 11 upon America, no matter how far removed from the act. You make your bed with the infamous, just as certainly as had you allied yourself with the Nazi party.

Mayor Bloombutt, while it may be apparent to the good people of New York City that you are a job-killing political opportunist, you now gain the infamous moniker of traitor—for granting aid and comfort to our mortal enemy, by conspiring in a scheme to give our enemy a symbol of victory over those 3000 Americans, against whom, its willing soldiers did act to incinerate, crush and rip to shreds.

Mayor Bloombutt, you propose that “freedom of religion” be bestowed upon an ideology whose first tenet is to deny freedom to all other creeds! However, you will soon regret this delusional alliance with the Devil’s caliphate. You will pay dearly for the dis-respect shown those who were murdered by your new-found associates.

Your Islamic “friends” are the heathen parasites of mankind, and have duly established themselves as such since the seventh century. You ally yourself with an ideology whose central belief requires the submission off all humanity, and whose “holy book” demands enslavement or slaughter of any who refuse to surrender their conscience to its perverted dictates. The murder of the innocent and the defenseless is considered a just punishment for their failure to bow in servitude. Murder of men, women and children is a special duty owed to the ghoulish devil these reprobates call “allah.” For this cause, Mayor Bloombutt, you sell your soul... in the misplaced advocacy of “religious freedom” ... for those who truly despise the very idea of individual freedom altogether.

A curse upon you Mayor, if you proceed with this gross insult against justice. May you know nothing but misery in this life and the next, if this infamous edifice, this altar to Satan himself, is ever allowed to rise above the streets of lower Manhattan.


54 posted on 08/12/2010 8:34:34 PM PDT by TCH (DON'T BE AN "O-HOLE"! ... DEMAND YOUR STATE ENACT ITS SOVEREIGNTY !When a majority of the American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: paudio

“However, not allowing them to build mosque is a bit too far.”

That is exactly what Islam banks on... and why it will eventually overtake and destroy this nation, just as it has successfully done in Europe... and every other place where it is allowed to take root. Islam, when practiced to its natural ends—that is practiced to its ordained fulfillment— is the enemy of freedom... ALL freedom


55 posted on 08/12/2010 8:51:08 PM PDT by TCH (DON'T BE AN "O-HOLE"! ... DEMAND YOUR STATE ENACT ITS SOVEREIGNTY !When a majority of the American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Bookmark


56 posted on 08/12/2010 8:51:55 PM PDT by DirtyHarryY2K (The Tree of Liberty is long overdue for its natural manure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TCH

The way to prevent Islam to spread is to educate your children about the values of Christianity, classical liberalism, and patriotism. Also, fight hard for not giving the Muslims preferential treatments. Forbidding them from building mosques is not only against the 1st Amendment, it also is not much different from what the Muslims do. Again, I’m very familiar on the danger of Islamic spread—I lived in an Islamic country for very long. But, I also hold to the idea of freedom of religion.


57 posted on 08/12/2010 9:27:43 PM PDT by paudio (She wanted to be known as the second Jackie O. Instead, people see her another Marie Antoinette)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Islam is NOT a religion... it is a MILITANT POLITICAL IDEOLOGY hiding behind the facade of religion.

Islam is no more a religion than that practice exercised by the Aztecs, the central purpose of which was the acquiring, centralization and increase of POLITICAL MILITARY POWER, the end goal being TOTAL DOMINATION.

Stop hiding behind First Amendment arguments. This is not about the First Amendment. This is about one groups attempt at world domination, one little step at a time. Man, do you have any grasp on the history of this “religion”?


58 posted on 08/12/2010 9:47:21 PM PDT by TCH (DON'T BE AN "O-HOLE"! ... DEMAND YOUR STATE ENACT ITS SOVEREIGNTY !When a majority of the American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TCH
As I said, I lived in an Islamic country, and learned a lot about it. I completely understand the danger. At the same time, I try to be consistent as a person. As I believe in classical liberalism, I don't believe in banning religious place.

I am also far from a PC person. So, I'm against giving them preferential treatments, nor do I try to avoid them from being offended.

59 posted on 08/12/2010 10:09:01 PM PDT by paudio (She wanted to be known as the second Jackie O. Instead, people see her another Marie Antoinette)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: True_Kon; pissant

“First Ammendment will not permit this.”

In all seriousness, and with full understanding of the implications of doing so, I believe the First Amendment should be re-written to _specifically exclude_ “the followers of Muhammed” from any and all of its protections.

Wasn’t it Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes who once said that “the Constitution is not a suicide pact”?

I predict that if we keep going in the direction we’re going, that our very own First Amendment is going to become the weapon that ultimately destroys us.

And for that reason, It should be changed so that it cannot become the instrument of our own cultural suicide.

Islam should be banned in the USA — and in the “rest of The West”, as well.

Islamics _in_ The West should be given two options:
1. Publicly convert, or,
2. Leave - under force, if necessary.

You’ll respond by saying, “if we demand that of them, we are no better than they are!”

To which I respond, “hogwash”.

What are the options that Islam gives to infidels? They give them three, I believe — what are they?

So long as Islam is what it is (and it is and must remain the UNCHANGEABLE word of Muhammed), it is anathema to all that The West believes and embraces.

So long as Islam is what it is, it is in fact a cancer upon The West.

What do we do when we find a cancer growing within our own bodies?
Do we “tolerate” it?
Do we embrace it?
What do we do about it?


60 posted on 08/15/2010 9:25:46 PM PDT by Grumplestiltskin (I may look new, but it's only deja vu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson