Federal judge overturns gay marriage ban in Calif.

ap ^ | Aug 4 | LISA LEFF

[little jeremiah]

Whence, here is part of Jim Robinson's mission statement, you can click the link and read the whole thing, then you'll understand that FR is not a "free for all" any opinion goes website. It is for conservative discussion, and the homosexual agenda is not in any way shape or form conservative. You're new here, so maybe you have not read this, it is on the home page of FR - actually part of it is, and then linked. It's well worth reading in its entirety.

As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty.

[little jeremiah]

I’m a techtard and can never make a link work if I’m using html so here’s the link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1103363/posts

Statement by the founder of Free Republic
Free Republic ^ | Jim Robinson

Posted on Monday, March 22, 2004 7:22:17 PM by Jim Robinson

[DBeers]

LOL. I previously observed that it seems if you take a position opposing yours, you would be be banned because the owner forbids those views from being posted. And now you expect me to respond otherwise to your reply.

You state no position -I do and post it. No reply necessary.

[Sons of Union Vets]

Bravo to your daughter and God bless her!

For parents who have no choice but to work outside the home, maybe they could partner up with other parents to start their own schools that reflect their religious and moral values.

Since they are taxpayers, they shouldn't have to resort to this, but until the tyrants are booted out of office,(municipal, state and federal) there aren't too many other choices for parents who care about what their children are being taught.

I, for one, wouldn't send a dog I liked to most of the cesspools that currently pass for public schools in this country.

If you know the story of David Parker, you know that he went to jail in defense of his six-year-old son's innocence.

Here in Massachusetts, Parker was illegally denied his opt out right for his six-year-old son when he became aware - vis a vis publications (i.e. WHO'S IN A FAMILY?) that were part of the curriculum materials his son brought home from school in his "diversity bookbag" - that he was about to be indoctrinated into acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle as something as normal as heterosexual marriage.

WHO'S IN A FAMILY?

http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/29/whos-in-a-family/

Another popular "diversity" indoctrination story is KING AND KING.

KING AND KING

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_%26_King

As the article on KING AND KING states, the story ends with a kiss between the two kings. You tell me if that is not indoctrinating children into an acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle.

Another family who has been involved in the fight against indoctrination of children into the "normality" of homosexuality is the Wirthlin family. Although the Wirthlins are from Massachusetts, they became involved in working for the passage of Prop 8 in California after their experience with the consequences of "gay marriage" here in Massachusetts.

http://www.protectmarriage.com/video/view/6

Neither the Parkers nor the Wirthlins buy the idea that discussions of sexuality - especially homosexuality - just arise "spontaneously" among six-year-olds without any prompting from members of the agenda-driven faculty. I don't either!

http://www.davidparkerfund.org/html/background.html

As far as I know, the Parkers and the Wirthlins are now homeschooling their children.

[little jeremiah]

Another one. At least 10 have crawled out of the woodwork.

Coronal, you are comparing segragation laws to same sex marriage laws and then saying you are not comparing black people to sexual perverts.

But you are. Race is neutral and unchangeable. Homosexuality is neither.

[Jim Robinson]

You’re an idiot.

[Jim Robinson]

Homosexuals are segregated by choice. There’s no way government will force me to integrate with a homosexual. Your mileage may vary, of course.

[RedMonqey]

5 - 4 overturn with Kennedy the swing vote.

'Fraid you will be disappointed. Every case which reached the Supreme Court involving homosexuality, Kennedy voted to overturn it. The Texas law banning sodomy was overturned with Kennedy voting with the Sodomites.

At least 5 - 4 to affirm lower courts decision, Kennedy with the Sodomites.

Gay marriage in EVERY STATE.

Sodom and Gomorrah Version 2.0, American style......

Time to stock up on Flame retardent underwear...