Skip to comments.
Wikileaks Releases U.S. Afghanistan War Files; Partners With NY Times, UK Guardian, Der Spiegel
Sunday, July 25, 2010
| Kristinn
Posted on 07/25/2010 2:51:21 PM PDT by kristinn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-194 next last
To: kristinn
If the perp is white Holder will prosecute. Not very effectively, I’m sure, but still....
141
posted on
07/26/2010 4:41:39 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
(Heckuva job, Brownie!.)
To: kristinn; All
142
posted on
07/26/2010 4:44:07 PM PDT
by
HollyB
To: Mariner; smokingfrog
There’s a WSJ article on Drudge stating that the Pentagon is checking Manning out. The link is above.
143
posted on
07/26/2010 4:45:23 PM PDT
by
HollyB
To: kristinn
This is what Obama meant by transparency. As long as it doesn’t cost him and his cronies anything he does not care about our troops.
144
posted on
07/26/2010 4:50:19 PM PDT
by
I Hate Obama
("Sorry I had a fight in the middle of your Black Panther Party." -Forest Gump)
To: driftdiver
Do you ever wonder if some people have multiple screen names?
145
posted on
07/26/2010 4:52:51 PM PDT
by
HollyB
To: HollyB
I’d wager on multiple screen names for several folks around here.
146
posted on
07/26/2010 4:57:54 PM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: GodBlessTheLittlePeople
Why is I think the Bamster is actually your hero.
147
posted on
07/26/2010 5:07:23 PM PDT
by
beandog
To: HollyB
148
posted on
07/26/2010 5:23:10 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
(freerepublic.com - Now 100% flag free.)
To: beandog
Why is I think the Bamster is actually your hero. I know you are, but what am I? (Infinity)
To: Yorktownpatriot
150
posted on
07/26/2010 6:16:46 PM PDT
by
Ptarmigan
(Remember The Great Ptarmigan/Rabbit War!)
To: GodBlessTheLittlePeople
Ahhh, so it’s true! Any moment we should have feedback from the other screen name. Kind of like DID disorder with one agenda.
151
posted on
07/26/2010 6:25:34 PM PDT
by
HollyB
cc: beandog, driftdiver
above
152
posted on
07/26/2010 6:26:32 PM PDT
by
HollyB
To: LucyT
Thanks for the alert Lucy. Drudge has “secret but not top secret” and White House...”made no attempts to...” headlines.
153
posted on
07/26/2010 6:50:06 PM PDT
by
potlatch
(*snip* - *snap*)
To: driftdiver
“You disgust me. You can hang right next to the New York Times and the traitor releasing this information.”
What if someone you knew worked in the Obama administration and he told you of a Top Secret (classified) plot on Obama’s part to seize the guns of the American people, and you knew the government would begin the crackdown at midnight the next day. Would you (a) immediately call the FBI and tell them that your friend was a traitor and then quietly go about your business or would you (b) notify as many people as you could?
Hopefully and truthfully, you would answer “(b)” because you realize that sometimes the people need to know regardless of the government’s desire to keep something secret. It is something that has to be weighed in every case. It is not easy, but it is a duty of a free press to make that judgment from time to time. It is too important a decision to leave solely to the discretion of a government bureaucrat.
To: kristinn
16 pages of KLE's, many of whom will be outed as collaborators with the enemy and some will pay with their lives. But unlike Valerie Plame, outed by Cheney, I mean Rove, I mean Libby, I mean that dastardly devil, Richard Armitage, These are Afghans, mere subhumans, so the NYT doesn't care. Liberals are so........unliberal.
155
posted on
07/26/2010 9:10:06 PM PDT
by
cookcounty
("Today's White House reporters seem one ball short of a ping pong scrimmage.")
To: freethinker_for_freedom
And how did releasing classified documents about the war in Afghanistan and soldiers personal encounters help us? What good did it bring to our troops? What good did it bring to you? Who exactly did this benefit and how so?
156
posted on
07/26/2010 9:10:47 PM PDT
by
HollyB
To: Vendome
To: freethinker_for_freedom
You can play “what ifs” all day long and you still are disgusting.
These traitors released military secrets during a war and you are supporting them. Secrets that will most likely get people killed. The only question is how many.
158
posted on
07/27/2010 3:51:51 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
You can play what ifs all day long and you still are disgusting. So not only do you blindly support Obama's Pentagon bureaucrats, but you also confessed to essentially being a gun grabber. Here is another headline concerning your Pentagon rubberstampers. It's amazing you trust these people so much with what information should be shared. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/24/pentagon-us-staff-downloaded-child-pornography
To: GodBlessTheLittlePeople
yeah amazing that I trust our generals and other military experts.
Lets see, the NYTs or General Petraeus, boy thats a tough one.
160
posted on
07/27/2010 10:52:29 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-194 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson