Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/12/2010 11:03:42 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: cycle of discernment

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2551150/posts


2 posted on 07/12/2010 11:04:37 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

Is there a way to get him out of office based on this info?


3 posted on 07/12/2010 11:05:22 AM PDT by camerongood210
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

That’s WHY Obama wants to WELCOME ILLEGALS!

Obama doesn’t vote any investigations into ODD voter patterns - like when MORE people VOTE in a country than there are people!


4 posted on 07/12/2010 11:05:36 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

Minnesota got what they deserve. It shouldn’t have even been close enough to worry about.

They wanted a liberal idiot, they got one.


5 posted on 07/12/2010 11:06:11 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

oh, geeze. the odds against the sunrise would have been greater.


8 posted on 07/12/2010 11:10:30 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (we shall overcome a generation of affirmative action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

I’m sure Bambi got his share Too.


13 posted on 07/12/2010 11:15:48 AM PDT by ustanker ( Term Limits!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve

Ping!


16 posted on 07/12/2010 11:19:08 AM PDT by Manic_Episode (Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

Duh? The recount put him over the top!!! The democrats are good at cheating on the recounts!!!!


18 posted on 07/12/2010 11:20:20 AM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

Why are we surprised?


20 posted on 07/12/2010 11:20:45 AM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

There were many, many other instances of voter fraud, most perpetrated by the democrats during the “recount” that led to Coleman losing.

The biggest problem was, however, that Coleman is a loser and didn’t fight fire with fire.

He just rolled over and died even after he had legally won the election.


21 posted on 07/12/2010 11:22:22 AM PDT by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

"Doggone it, felons like me!"

22 posted on 07/12/2010 11:24:07 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (" 'Bush did it' is not a foreign policy." -- Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

Ellison wants to ban photo ID as requirement for voting
http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/ap/index.cfm?page=view&id=D8SKGI6G1

Requiring photo IDs to vote in federal elections would be banned under legislation introduced Wednesday by Rep. Keith Ellison, who said such requirements disenfranchise minorities, the poor, women, elderly and young people.

“While photo IDs seem harmless, they are in fact the modern day poll tax,” Ellison, D-Minn., said in a statement.

Ellison, who serves on the Judiciary Committee, got an important backer for the bill, as the panel’s chairman, Michigan Democrat John Conyers, signed on a co-sponsor.

Ellison proposed the bill the day after the chief of the Justice Department’s voting rights division, John Tanner, apologized at a House Judiciary subcommittee hearing for saying that aging is not a problem with black voters because they die before they become elderly. Ellison and other Democrats grilled Tanner at that hearing.

At a National Latino Congreso in Los Angeles earlier in the month, Tanner had discussed state laws that require photo identification for voting, saying that elderly voters disproportionately don’t have the proper IDs.

“That’s a shame, you know, creating problems for elderly persons just is not good under any circumstance,” Tanner said, according to video posted on YouTube. “Of course, that also ties into the racial aspect because our society is such that minorities don’t become elderly the way white people do. They die first.”

Tanner had also been criticized for clearing a Georgia law requiring voters to show government-issued photo IDs at the polls. A subsequent photo ID law was upheld by a federal judge last month, and the U.S. Supreme Court will consider Indiana’s photo ID law, which is similar to Georgia’s, this term.

Ellison noted that people do not need a photo ID to vote in Minnesota.

“In Minnesota we go to great lengths to make voting as inclusive as possible,” he said, arguing that has helped with voter turnout. But advocates of voter ID laws argue they’re needed to prevent voter fraud.

Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said that requiring a voter ID helps preserve the integrity of the voting process.

“The right to vote is one of the most fundamental liberties we have as Americans,” he said. “And to protect that right, we must ensure that those who vote do so legally.”


“modern day poll tax,”

No, that would be if we made you pay to vote with a check and produce an ID to verify your check.

Watch a leftie’s head explode: ask them if they believe kids should be “forced” to show valid photo ID before purchasing cigarettes. Or does that “disenfrachise” them?

You need ID to fly to Chicago, cash your SOSH security check or buy a can of spray paint if you look too young. so...what’s the big deal? The only people opposed to a photo ID to vote are groups who would profit from the ease of ineligible voters(IE illegal aliens,felons,ect) being able to vote.


24 posted on 07/12/2010 11:24:47 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (drain the swamp! ( then napalm it and pave it over ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment
Voter Corruption Electing a Dem?

I'm shocked. SHOCKED, I say!

26 posted on 07/12/2010 11:27:35 AM PDT by llevrok (These days, I am a stranger in the country I was born and raised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment
Felons for Franken!

Rather a catchy campaign slogan.

29 posted on 07/12/2010 11:33:20 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

did I miss something — why are illegal votes even being counted?


30 posted on 07/12/2010 11:33:29 AM PDT by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

Take a lesson to heart: Democrats will do ANYTHING to win. Anything!


34 posted on 07/12/2010 11:48:00 AM PDT by Rapscallion (Obama - The anti-American dictator disguised as a President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

The only reason the voting process isn’t as secure as the state lottery is because the politicians do not want it to be so.


35 posted on 07/12/2010 11:48:44 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

I’m shocked, SHOCKED.

Imagine my surprise.


38 posted on 07/12/2010 11:56:44 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (O Maria, sine labe concepta, ora pro nobis qui ad te confugimus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

Incredible


39 posted on 07/12/2010 12:01:33 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment

What put him over the top was the recount of “found” ballots, in other words fake ballots planted during the recount. Every state should pass a law that disallows ballots found after the original count.


41 posted on 07/12/2010 12:06:15 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson