Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Felons Voting Illegally May Have Put Franken Over the Top in Minnesota, Study Finds
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/12/felons-voting-illegally-franken-minnesota-study-finds/ ^

Posted on 07/12/2010 11:03:39 AM PDT by cycle of discernment

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: cycle of discernment

There were many, many other instances of voter fraud, most perpetrated by the democrats during the “recount” that led to Coleman losing.

The biggest problem was, however, that Coleman is a loser and didn’t fight fire with fire.

He just rolled over and died even after he had legally won the election.


21 posted on 07/12/2010 11:22:22 AM PDT by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

"Doggone it, felons like me!"

22 posted on 07/12/2010 11:24:07 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (" 'Bush did it' is not a foreign policy." -- Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
"It shouldn’t have even been close enough to worry about.
They wanted a liberal idiot, they got one.
"
No, the dems and ACORN wanted a liberal idiot and got one.

1) Secretary of State Mark Ritchie (dem) was asked to investigate serious problems with the registration rolls, including 261,000 duplicates and 63,000 voters who had listed non-existent addresses.
2) Some 17,000 more ballots were counted in the Minnesota Senate election than there were recorded voters.
3) Outside investigators also found that 1,400 convicted felons had voted illegally.

The dems had tens of thousands of fraudulent votes and they still needed to "find" votes after the election to put Franken on top.
23 posted on 07/12/2010 11:24:32 AM PDT by astyanax (Liberalism: Logic's retarded cousin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Ellison wants to ban photo ID as requirement for voting
http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/ap/index.cfm?page=view&id=D8SKGI6G1

Requiring photo IDs to vote in federal elections would be banned under legislation introduced Wednesday by Rep. Keith Ellison, who said such requirements disenfranchise minorities, the poor, women, elderly and young people.

“While photo IDs seem harmless, they are in fact the modern day poll tax,” Ellison, D-Minn., said in a statement.

Ellison, who serves on the Judiciary Committee, got an important backer for the bill, as the panel’s chairman, Michigan Democrat John Conyers, signed on a co-sponsor.

Ellison proposed the bill the day after the chief of the Justice Department’s voting rights division, John Tanner, apologized at a House Judiciary subcommittee hearing for saying that aging is not a problem with black voters because they die before they become elderly. Ellison and other Democrats grilled Tanner at that hearing.

At a National Latino Congreso in Los Angeles earlier in the month, Tanner had discussed state laws that require photo identification for voting, saying that elderly voters disproportionately don’t have the proper IDs.

“That’s a shame, you know, creating problems for elderly persons just is not good under any circumstance,” Tanner said, according to video posted on YouTube. “Of course, that also ties into the racial aspect because our society is such that minorities don’t become elderly the way white people do. They die first.”

Tanner had also been criticized for clearing a Georgia law requiring voters to show government-issued photo IDs at the polls. A subsequent photo ID law was upheld by a federal judge last month, and the U.S. Supreme Court will consider Indiana’s photo ID law, which is similar to Georgia’s, this term.

Ellison noted that people do not need a photo ID to vote in Minnesota.

“In Minnesota we go to great lengths to make voting as inclusive as possible,” he said, arguing that has helped with voter turnout. But advocates of voter ID laws argue they’re needed to prevent voter fraud.

Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said that requiring a voter ID helps preserve the integrity of the voting process.

“The right to vote is one of the most fundamental liberties we have as Americans,” he said. “And to protect that right, we must ensure that those who vote do so legally.”


“modern day poll tax,”

No, that would be if we made you pay to vote with a check and produce an ID to verify your check.

Watch a leftie’s head explode: ask them if they believe kids should be “forced” to show valid photo ID before purchasing cigarettes. Or does that “disenfrachise” them?

You need ID to fly to Chicago, cash your SOSH security check or buy a can of spray paint if you look too young. so...what’s the big deal? The only people opposed to a photo ID to vote are groups who would profit from the ease of ineligible voters(IE illegal aliens,felons,ect) being able to vote.


24 posted on 07/12/2010 11:24:47 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (drain the swamp! ( then napalm it and pave it over ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaidyn

There are only two sides here: Those who want to stop fraud and those who will be irreparably harmed if the fraud is not allowed to continue.


25 posted on 07/12/2010 11:26:24 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (drain the swamp! ( then napalm it and pave it over ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
Voter Corruption Electing a Dem?

I'm shocked. SHOCKED, I say!

26 posted on 07/12/2010 11:27:35 AM PDT by llevrok (These days, I am a stranger in the country I was born and raised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Filo
The biggest problem was, however, that Coleman is a loser

He was a big winner in selecting a hot wife, however.

27 posted on 07/12/2010 11:29:00 AM PDT by llevrok (These days, I am a stranger in the country I was born and raised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cranked

The Democrats are working out the bugs in preparation for massive voter fraud in 2012, which will be aided and abetted by the MSM.


28 posted on 07/12/2010 11:29:47 AM PDT by Spok (Free Range Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
Felons for Franken!

Rather a catchy campaign slogan.

29 posted on 07/12/2010 11:33:20 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

did I miss something — why are illegal votes even being counted?


30 posted on 07/12/2010 11:33:29 AM PDT by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Minnesota got what they deserve. It shouldn’t have even been close enough to worry about.

So you are basically saying "screw you" to 50% of the voters because the other 50% are liberal idiots?

Good grief.

31 posted on 07/12/2010 11:36:19 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode

My apologies to the Conservatives..

It appears that you live in a state that is blatantly criminal in it’s election process, and if you do not want to see this theft take place again you need to get active in working to prevent it

It is bad enpough to live in a Democrat Machine State , but to live in a criminal machine state is much worse..

But is there really a difference? Is not every Democrat machine state a criminal state?


32 posted on 07/12/2010 11:37:11 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

Again, my apologies to Conservatives who voted against this idiot.

You live in a criminal state and must work hard to change this.


33 posted on 07/12/2010 11:39:38 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Take a lesson to heart: Democrats will do ANYTHING to win. Anything!


34 posted on 07/12/2010 11:48:00 AM PDT by Rapscallion (Obama - The anti-American dictator disguised as a President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

The only reason the voting process isn’t as secure as the state lottery is because the politicians do not want it to be so.


35 posted on 07/12/2010 11:48:44 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh
What I remember is every time Coleman WON, there was a recount and MORE ballots appeared out of no where till Franken won. It was so OBVIOUS as to what was going on. FRAUD IN THE OPEN.

It worked very well in Washington State in 2004. More ballots were "discovered" some 13 different times. Seattle is SO corrupt.

36 posted on 07/12/2010 11:52:06 AM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
We are past the point of settling this with elections.

The three boxes of politics: the soap box, the ballot box and the cartridge box.

The extreme left MSM dominates the soap box.

Democrat voter fraud controls the ballot box.

All we have left is the cartridge box.

37 posted on 07/12/2010 11:55:02 AM PDT by cayuga (The only good Socialist is a dead Socialist. We obviously need more good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

I’m shocked, SHOCKED.

Imagine my surprise.


38 posted on 07/12/2010 11:56:44 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (O Maria, sine labe concepta, ora pro nobis qui ad te confugimus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Incredible


39 posted on 07/12/2010 12:01:33 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
They wanted a liberal idiot, they got one.

They wanted a liberal idiot, WE got one, is more like it.

40 posted on 07/12/2010 12:01:48 PM PDT by LouD ("against all enemies, foreign and domestic...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson