Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krugman Tries to Scare Up More Government Spending with 'Third Depression' Rhetoric
Newsbusters ^ | 6/28/10 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 06/28/2010 7:21:02 PM PDT by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: mo; The Magical Mischief Tour
He didn't say it couldn't be done, he said the left wing communists in charge at the moment can't do a thing to stop it because they won't admit that their marxist methods are wrong.

Granted he didn't use those words but they were implied.

21 posted on 06/28/2010 8:23:15 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Krugman is covering his a$$. He called for Porkulus. He knows it did more harm than good. He thinks the only way to salvage his reputation is to claim it didn’t go far enough.


22 posted on 06/28/2010 8:25:11 PM PDT by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Krugman should give Al Gore a massage.


23 posted on 06/29/2010 2:08:03 AM PDT by StopObama2012 (CLICK ME to expose Osaudi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Cut off the stimulus and fire 75% of the government workers.


24 posted on 06/29/2010 2:29:32 AM PDT by dalereed (in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommieCutter
It's funny that one of the arguments AGAINST the idea that labor is the most important part of an economy is this: “If that were true, then I could go in my back yard and dig holes all day and become rich.”

And I hate to say it and know it is sacrilege here on FR, but the Keynesians LOVE Milton Friedman who, as a monetarist, advocated Keynesian-type economics, that is, the printing and spending of fiat currency as THE source of economic growth.

Few of them know that toward the end of his life, even Friedman (who supported FDR's New Deal for most of the 30’s), even began to doubt this theory. He stated toward the end that monetarism could only work if the amount of newly created money were restricted to a percentage of GDP through an Amendment to the US Constitution.

I'm glad that Friedman started to “get it” at the end, but he didn't get it enough. Because government spending is 1/3 the formula for calculating GDP, all the government and mega-bankers would need to do to increase money printing next year is massively increase the obligation of the government to spend this year. Voila, GDP jumps a huge percentage and they would be able to print off that.

That said, I love Friedman's writing on capitalism and freedom and the interrelationship between capitalism and democracy. It just makes my head spin that he couldn't see that monetarism is rooted in central management of the economy, which is socialistic, not free-market or democratic.

25 posted on 06/29/2010 5:16:38 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

Pass this out if your friends haven’t seen it.

It’s probably floated around quite a bit on the FR.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1STWYCn-hc


26 posted on 07/02/2010 3:03:46 PM PDT by CommieCutter (Obamanomics :Privatize Gains, Socialize Losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson