N.C. Atheists Declare 'One Nation Indivisible' Without God...

Christian Post ^ | June 24th, 2010

[TaraP]

And they wonder why, our world is in the condition that it's in.

[pnh102]

LOL. Discrimination? Whatever.

[equalitybeforethelaw]

All 15 of them were able to afford a sign? Wow.

[SnakeDoctor]

True atheists/agnostics feel no need to evangelize — they don’t know what’s true, and they don’t care what you think is true.

Anti-Christian “atheists” evangelize incessantly. The problem (non-theologically speaking) is not their atheism, it is their anti-Christianity.

SnakeDoc

[throwback]

you can't have an indivisible nation if you draw a line between the godly and godless

Sounds good to me. Which part do they want?

[highlander_UW]

But Joseph McDaniel Stewart, vice president of FreeThoughtAction, which contributed funds for the ad campaign in North Carolina, argues that when the terms "under God" were inserted between "one nation" and "indivisible," "they made a lie out of both those ideals because you can't have an indivisible nation if you draw a line between the godly and godless."

And removing those words would also draw a line. Argument fail.

[MANO]

I would find the statement “One Nation Indivisible.” to be very divisive

[brushcop]

Lessee now, nice sign but just WHO’S moral code, who’s laws shall we abide by?? Obama’s? Kerry’s? Maybe Pelosi’s?

No thanks, I’ll continue with the unchanging TRUTH of the Bible and our Lord and Savior. Thanks.

[massgopguy]

I remember a 60 Minutes segment on Madeline Murray O’Hare, where she said her group was not against Christianity. The camera panned to a table top full of bumper stickers. One read: “Jesus Is Lard”. Go for a nice long drive Maddy.

[Vendome]

[antiRepublicrat]

And they wonder why, our world is in the condition that it's in.

"Under God" has been the motto and part of the pledge since 1954, yet so many people see that time as the standard, followed by downward slide. So lot of good it did, right?

E Pluribus Unum was our motto for over a century, and it was a good one, "from many one" describing the very core value of this country, that no matter where we come from or what our differences are, we are Americans. Before the change in attitude, immigrants learned the language, wanted to be Americans. Now they think they can immigrate to America without really becoming American, and even doing the smallest thing like learn the language. You reached for "Under God" and having failed to achieve it, still succeeded in letting E Pluribus Unum die. Thanks.

[Tax-chick]

Many of us here in NC agree with you.

[Vendome]

I met Jane Seymour at a party some time ago and I can assure you God is real and all powerful.

 

Only God would deliver to man the beauty and wonders of a woman.

 

Only God could make someone beautiful and then call her Jane Seymour.

 

[x]

Only God could make someone beautiful and then call her Jane Seymour.

God (or her parents) called her Joyce Penelope Wilhelmina Frankenberg.

She picked out the name "Jane Seymour" herself, after one of Henry VIII's wives.

[TaraP]

Yes..But she does not hold a Candle to my grandmother...

A Woman who was loved by everyone that knew her..

A Woman of little means...Who had alot of heartbreak, yet she had more love in her than anyone I have ever known....

GOD took her back to heaven, and I know said..Your love and beauty is a reflection of heaven..

Come on in!

[Vendome]

I think we worship two different God’s. LOL

That is not Jany Seymour! /s LOL

[throwback]

So the country’s failing because of too much faith?

[antiRepublicrat]

So the country’s failing because of too much faith?

Putting "Under God" in a pledge doesn't have much to do with the faith of the people or the success of the country. It's worthless grandstanding. It being there only serves to give the religious a hard-on and everybody else a complaint.

In other words, if that being there had any effect whatsoever, religious people wouldn't be pining for the old days of when it was first put in there.