Posted on 06/19/2010 5:04:00 AM PDT by Willie Green
Passenger rail is not only more efficient than than traveling by bus, it also provides more spacious accommodations for the troops and their gear. No sense squeezing them like sardines for a miserable 3~4 hour bus ride when they can arrive relaxed and refreshed and fully attentive for their training if they travel by train!!!
Excellent idea, obviously it wasn’t from the POTUS.
Soldiers have a ton of gear, much more so than a generation ago, and a train is safer to transport weapons.
Cool, coffee and doughnut stops between destinations with bands and towns people greeting them. The good ole days are coming back?
Ft Lee to Fort AP Hill. Wow, that’s a blast from our historic past!
Excellent idea, obviously it wasnt from the POTUS.
Domestic troop movement was obviously a low priority and neglected by the Oil and Transportation Lobbies as well.
The Freight RRs just booted 'em off the tracks and told 'em to go find a bus instead.
In 1963, we had a couple of guys lose their front teeth in minor bus, army bus, bang ups, going to then Camp A P Hill
from Fort Belvoir. No one wanted to ride in army ambulances then because of poor drivers, wreck to wreck.
Busses to take them three miles?
THREE miles?
THREE MILES!!!
Ooo pooor widdle troopies, ooo.
Can’t march THREE miles. Eeeech.
The troops will have to be transported (on busses) from their barracks to the station which will be located outside of Fort Lee. They will spend endless time waiting to load. Take the train up to Milford. Wait outside at the expansive Milford Virginia terminal:
And then board school busses (really roomy there) for the last 10 miles of the trip. (The Army will lease tour busses for trips between installations, but they use school busses for trips on installations)
All to save a 74 mile long trip on the highway. (which, oh by the way, they could do on US 301 and never touch I-95)
As for the roominess...they will have to pack to ride on busses, not a train. VRE trains (which is likely what they'd use) have the same exact type of seats as tour busses.
They will have to transfer cargo twice where they wouldn't have to do so otherwise.
All to avoid 64 miles of driving...and only about 18 miles of which would typically be on I-95 (which is the real motivation behind what they're doing).
No, thanks.
I can support train travel where it makes sense (commuter travel in metro areas and intercity travel between reasonably close cities, like DC to Balto, Philly, NYC, and Boston)
But this is an idiotic idea.
If some bozo budget cutter abandoned the base railroad sidings for that libtard "rails to trails" program, they should be rebuilt immediately.
I thought about that, but then I looked at those 3 miles. No way to march them without seriously disrupting traffic.
Ask a Force Protection Officer if this is a good idea!
You would have to guard the length of the track 24/7.
Ask a Force Protection Officer if this is a good idea!
You would have to guard the length of the track 24/7.
Ask a Force Protection Officer if they have guards posted the full length of the Interstate highway for 24/7.
The troops will load ON Fort Lee property, probably in Warehouse row, where the railroad spur is located.
I guess the bus trip on the other side depends on where within Fort AP Hill they are going.
But it does require a transfer, and it is to eliminate a rather short in distance trip.
On the other hand, I-95 between Fredericksburg and Fort AP Hill is often a parking lot. I drive from Manassas to Kings Dominion regularly (a nominal 1:15 hour drive), and there are times when that takes over 2 hours because of traffic on I-95.
Driving the back roads is neither faster nor safer.
Of course, their argument about safety is stupid. It’s not like they are regularly having accidents, and there are likely to be injuries in this new transportation scheme as well, including at some point the possibility of a train crash, which while UNLIKELY, has the result of hurting a lot more troops at one time.
For some reason, Fort AP Hill doesn’t have a rail spur. Maybe they could build one as part of this new train travel idea, but it doesn’t look like they have any good choices for right-of-way between the tracks and the fort.
What are you smoking pal?
Also, I’m not sure exactly what train route they will use. I don’t see any direct routes between the sites, it seems they’ll have to go pretty far off-track and do several switchbacks to get back and forth.
Most if not all were ripped out during the CarDUH an ClinTOON Administrations
I do think rail terrorism is a potential risk.Spain,Russia and India come to mind.Why do we let people know troop movements? MY German girlfriend knew when our unit would have an alert or field problem before I did.
Why would the ARmy use buses to transport troops THREE miles. Looks like the troops could use the three mile hike as part of their PT.
Or is that an old-fashioned idea?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.