Worthy of a permanent tagline and nominee for post of the day!
Posted on 06/10/2010 8:34:53 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
“really, most of them, are, you know, very much, uh, uh, you know, against so many of things that women have fought for such a long time. “
Um, what?
A whore at Barbarella in Rio
or a rich Missoni type gal with a known name at Hippopatamus in Ipanema
the odds were still very good.
it's part of their culture
Australia too but mostly with foreigners...back then Aussie men were hard on their women compared to a Southern boy like me.
Jewish girls in Manhattan liked boys like me too...something different. They would have grown to hate me though..lol
Worthy of a permanent tagline and nominee for post of the day!
I gotta’ remember that one. Its a keeper.
It had to happen. All the Puritans came here.
It had to happen. All the Puritans came here.
I’m guessing this one is at that awkward age all lefty broads face when they have to switch over from KY jelly to Poligrip.
The feminists like these have no idea that burning your bra and growing facial hair is no longer “feminine.”
What a bunch of wasted air time. I shoulda watched so I could boycott the advertisers and tell them so.
It was Hillary becoming a senator.
Actually, Monica Lewinsky was a blow to feminism.
Tina Brown: Dumb Whore Mumbling
IMPACT OF “DIVERSITY,” HOMOSEXUALITY, FEMINISM AND PC ON THE WEST
I believe it was the EARLY Romans who prohibited several classes of people from holding public office: Those of illegitimate birth (bastards), eunuchs and homosexuals. (That unfortunately changed leading up to the fall.)
While these children had no choice in the matter, bastards were prohibited because, having no sense of their family past or history, they could not be trusted to operate for the good of the culture based on its history or traditions.
Eunuchs (castrated males) and homosexuals because they could not and/or would not sire children and would, therefore, most likely have no abiding interest in preserving the culture for future generations.
While there are a number of exceptions, I’ll let YOU tell me what sort of folks we have in public office HERE today.
It appears that America has employed technology to compress into slightly over 240 years what it took the Romans over 2,000 to achieve — total and utter cultural collapse.
I believe the Romans would also have put radical feminists in that group – had they permitted radical feminism at the time. Wisely, they did not. More on that a bit later.
While channel-surfing recently, I stopped for a moment on an Animal Planet show featuring two lesbian roommates. And, no, they were NOT in the bedroom. As I watched, I began pondering the question of the growing impact of homosexuals and radical feminists on our culture.
None of these thoughts are original to me and all have been written about and discussed ad nauseam. This little rant is really an exercise in catharsis.
At the individual level, I have personally known a few homosexuals and, in general, have found them to be quiet, respectful and intelligent. Again, there are exceptions – such as the moron from California (where else?) cited below — but I haven’t personally met them and hope I don’t as there would be serious trouble between us.
Having said that, I fear that the homosexual – and the recent politically correct fervor to further legitimize that lifestyle – has done irreparable harm to our NATIONAL life and what remains of what many of us still call Western European Culture. When that impact is coupled with the rise of radical feminism (you’ll be pleased to know that the EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT is again being disinterred), the product is a result from which the West may never recover.
Allow me to explain:
The physiological fact is that homosexuals normally do not reproduce. The current population replacement rate – the rate necessary to maintain the current native born population level — for the United States is somewhere north of 2 children per couple. Homosexuals usually don’t HAVE kids. Add the radical feminist impact – which holds that motherhood is some form of slavery and has driven many women to seek “fulfillment” OUTSIDE the home — and the current birth rate here is disturbingly FAR BELOW 2.1 per couple.
The other side of the demographic coin is that the virtually unrestrained immigration policies of past administrations have brought a huge influx of people from cultures radically different from that which existed here prior to the advent of PC, diversity, tolerance and all the other names by which many now call these self, nation and culture identity destroying behaviors.
Add the millions and millions of illegals who are now placing such a physical and economic burden on the healthcare and school systems that natural born citizens are being taxed to death and/or cannot, themselves, get the services to which they would otherwise be entitled. It’s a recipe for chaos.
And the politicians – who hope these new welfare recipients will support their perpetual reelection — turn a blind eye.
And as these groups agitate and campaign for THEIR particular flavor of diversity and tolerance, they also give added traction to virtually EVERY OTHER flavor. As they change millions of minds and cause others to reconsider long-standing and time-tested value systems, they are turning our world upside down.
The effect of these factors is that the America in which many of us older folks grew up is disappearing at an alarming rate. As the nation many of us came to love – and donned uniforms to defend – drifts toward some sort of Balkanized
despotism, large segments of these new arrivals – who know little and care even less of the traditions, values and history of this place and even refuse to learn the common tongue — separate themselves into ghetto-like enclaves where outsiders are often not welcomed unless they’re spending money, we run the very serious risk of repeating the experiences of the former Yugoslavia from which some of my people came.
Speaking of whom, my great-great grandparents waited for years then stood in long lines at Ellis Island to be deloused, interrogated and told they had to learn English and our history and traditions and pass a test – something the Hispanics and radical Muslim terrorists strolling across the border with Mexico don’ t have to do.
The Clinton administration – well known for its tolerance of the gay lifestyle – published some statistics in connection with AIDS that startled many. Of course, the PC then rearing its ugly head prohibited all but the brave from commenting on any of that.
The CDC statistics showed that 85% of all AIDS/HIV cases are
1. Active, non-monogamous homosexuals,
(the largest subset)
2. Heterosexuals and bisexuals who have had sex with group 1 and
3. IV drug abusers who share needles.
(Kinda gives new meaning to Romans 6:23, doesn’t it?)
The remaining 15% are those who have contracted AIDS via other,
non-sexual/non-drug means SUCH AS TRANSFUSIONS OF TAINTED BLOOD (which one homosexual “leader” on the West Coast URGED his fellow homosexuals to CONTINUE to attempt to contaminate in order to involve the straight community in the push to increase federal funding for AIDS research).
So, with the population replacement rate practically down to zero, we have some “leaders” of the homosexual community – who do nothing to help raise that rate – encouraging their members to make ill or kill those of us who have and/or are having and raising kids here.
I find it fascinating that many members of the homosexual community and the radical feminists are on the front line of the assault on traditional values and seek to replace them with more tolerance, diversity and other politically correct nonsense. They have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.
While their activities have produced short-term benefits for them, that diversity, tolerance and egalitarianism have also opened the door to the idea that no culture is “better” than any other. Obama – apparently having confused Chicago with America — spent days recently apologizing to everyone he met for our defective, decadent and corrupt culture.
And that has brought to our shores a formerly foreign culture, the more radical elements of which are breeding at a rate well in excess of the rate among the indigenous LEGAL and NATURAL BORN population.
And, just as it already has in Great Britain and continental Europe, with those increasing numbers will come increased political and social power.
And with that will surely come a foreign theology and law system.
And that foreign theology – that’d be Islam— and law system – that’d be Sharia — DOES NOT TOLERATE HOMOSEXUALITY and regards WOMEN AS CHATTEL WHO HAVE NO PERSONAL RIGHTS LET ALONE THE SORT OF FREEDOM TO WHICH THE FEMINISTS ARE ACCUSTOMED.
The bottom line, gays and ladies? You will either fall under the sword (put to death for you government school folk) or confined to the house unless your “man” – who will beat you periodically – wants to take you out, in which case you will be garbed from head to toe. And, only HE can drive the car. Where are Betty Freidan, Bella Abzug and Gloria Steinham when we really need them?
Here’s a short video clip of the reward your PC destruction of traditional American values will bring you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlyeT1MBEzE
A number of years ago, a writer posited that there was a “War Against Boys” within and without the government school system. He opined that little boys were being psychologically and emotionally emasculated by millions of female teachers and others in the America of John Wayne.
We have now entered the era of the feminized “metrosexual” (one now occupies the White House) where boys are discouraged – often prohibited — from playing games with toy plastic guns, rubber knives or other weapons. Feminists, if it hadn’t been for millions of young men with REAL guns venturing forth from time-to-time to face down very rough folks with designs on this country – and YOU — your freedom (albeit shrinking thanks largely to our having become the Metrosexual States of America) to promulgate your radical worldview would not exist.
So there you have it.
I’d urge you to think about these things while there MIGHT still be time to alter course.
PS: I had to get this out of my system BEFORE the new, improved congress passes the pending legislation making it a crime to post ANYTHING on the web that could in any way cause ANYONE emotional distress. Would it matter that it was factual? Nope! While it’s probable that the Supremes will rule it a violation of the First Amendment, I’d rather not squander my kids’ small inheritance on lawyers bringing the case.
Dick Bachert
5/6/2009
She’s just jealous of them all. They have made positive impacts on society using their talent, intellect, and other character traits foreign to left-leaning libtards.
Ask any of them for her opinion, on any issue, and she will invariable trot out the standard liberal response.
Abortion? It's my right.
Environment? Humans are killing the earth.
Gay marriage? Who are we to judge who loves whom?
Taxes? The rich have to pay their fair share.
Education? Teachers don't make enough money.
War? America's bad.
And so it goes. Every time. They are the epitome of groupthink, parroting what they know will make them acceptable to the "in" crowd. To be left out of the group is the worst fate they can imagine, and so they do nothing -- especially think, or voice anything contrary -- that would jeopardize it.
When confronted with a conservative woman, someone who truly is independent of these "popular" but canned and often indefensible responses, and willing to take the rejection it can bring, they're not able to recognize that it is she, the conservative, acting as the Feminist.
Maybe Tina should go take a Midol (sorry, I couldn’t resist this one)
Leave it to ABC.
Another reason why I don’t watch them anymore in the AM.
Yeah what about Bush adminiaton try free Agharn women from beating and burka where are Lib Feminazis you did’t hear peep from them
Only person I could think of in Hollywood champion freedom of Ahgarn women was Mrs Jay Leno she was the first one
I've always wanted to remind James Dobson how Christ's views on family radically diverge from Dobson's "Famly Values Coalition" at his Focus on the Family.
While Jesus does not condone homosexuality at all, He dealt with the problem of infertile, non child producing eunuchs — by saying that they had equal rights in His kingdom, or more — while implicitly saying marriage is a gift given only to some:
“For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.
Christ also warned that your enemies would be “those of your own household.”
The Apostle Paul advised that “it was better not to marry.”
Jesus declared “Who is my brother, my sister, my mother? Those that do the will of My father in heaven.”
Finally, Christ debunks the queasy Family Values morality — as well as the ancient Roman penchant for ancestor worship and bullying family pride — by declaring:
“If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters—yes, even his own life—he can not be my disciple”.
Jesus was a true radical.
By the way, early Christians were called “atheists” by the Romans because they would not bow the knee to the Roman god Caesar, leading up to all that bloodsport with the lions.
Roman "morality" is quite a heinous thing.
Strong and self confident women would not wish to be men. They understand they have been blessed with the distinction of being the indispensable bearers of life, and have no sense of resentment or envy toward men. They also won't put up with being treated like s*** by men (can you hear me, Hillary?)
Interestingly, one of the aspects of Islam (out of so very many to choose) which conservative men find especially offensive is their stupid and barbaric attitude toward and treatment of women. The founder of their religion was a pedophile and a rapist, so I suppose in that sense they are just staying true to their "faith".
"Feminism", like so many other "isms" that came out of the 19th and 20th centuries, turns out to be the opposite of what it purports. "Feminists" like Tina hate themselves, and especially hate other women who are comfortable in the skins God gave them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.