Posted on 05/25/2010 10:04:37 AM PDT by i88schwartz
Gibbs is on record as saying they checked it all out with WH lawyers and nothing inappropriate took place. If there was no job offer, why didn't Gibbs just say so? Why resort to the "no controlling legal authority" defense?
I know they don't want to make it look like Sestak was lying, but they could just claim a misunderstanding and let Sestak off the hook.
So Axelrod is throwing Sestak under the bus and going on record as saying the Democrat PA voters picked to run in November is a liar.
I guess rather than get into the details about this, they’re just going to concede the PA Senate election to Toomey.
That is exactly what will happen. They will come up with some wording like last week, "I didn't mean to say I was in VietNam".
It's always an excuse for their lies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.