HOLLISTER v. SOETORO - JOINT LETTER FILED - advising of additional authorities.

Scribd ^ | 5/25/2010 | John David Hemenway

[jamese777]

The Ankeny decision is erroneous on its face and is not precedent in any federal court, especially regarding the definition of NBC.

---

“Erroneous” to you but not reversed by the Indiana Supreme Court and not appealed to the US Court of Appeals or the US Supreme Court.
It hasn’t mattered whether any Obama eligibility lawsuit originated in federal courts or state courts, 69 lawsuits have been dismissed, denied or rejected and no plaintiff has prevailed at any level of the judiciary.

Whether the Ankeny decision will be cited in any other decision in state or federal courts remains to be seen. The decision was rendered too recently to be a precedent but you can bet that Obama and Department of Justice defense attorneys will be citing Ankeny in their dismissal briefs.

[Seizethecarp]

“The decision was rendered too recently to be a precedent but you can bet that Obama and Department of Justice defense attorneys will be citing Ankeny in their dismissal briefs.”

The DOJ will never cite Ankeny (only a state court comment in dicta which in note 14 admits that WKA never declared Wong to be NBC) when the DOJ can cite and falsely spin WKA (a SCOTUS case) to say that WKA directly confirmed that Wong was NBC. I believe DOJ has already cited WKA this way but it would nauseate me more than I am already nauseated by Obama’s press conference today to go and confirm it.