Posted on 05/24/2010 5:30:46 PM PDT by rxsid
HOLLISTER v. SOETORO - JOINT LETTER FILED - advising of additional authorities.
Nice
WE can only hope this results in the POS 0dumbo not being able to run in 12
BUMP
If you have the time and inclination, could you give me the gist of this filing? I’m a little out of the loop, but very interested.
If he's truly not Constitutionally eligible, then the usurper's entire "Presidency" should be made null and void. Including, but not limited to his SCOTUS picks as well as anything he has signed into law. Difficult and far reaching? Indeed.
I had read on a blog (I forget which) that members of the Adams family (Massachusetts) and Jefferson family (Virginia) had evidence of the origin and definition of Natural Born Citizenship, and the history of its inclusion in the U.S. Constitution, within their family archives.
Their stated intentions were at the proper time to step forward and offer their family’s records as supporting evidence in any Supreme Court cases challenging Obama’s eligibility.
I wonder about this latest event, and if it is a portent to an approaching flood of supporting documents.
The historical record must be set strait so as to prevent, as much as possible, a recurrence of someone born a subject to a foreign crown becoming our Commander in Chief simply because large numbers of people in this country are literally too ignorant of their countries history, or too preoccupied with American Idol to care.
His precedent must not be allowed to stand.
I want a historical verdict condemning him for eternity.
Basically, the lawyer for the plaintiff has filled a letter advising (the court) of additional authorities found, Ramsay (reaffirming Vattel's definition for NBC as born in country to citizen parents) and St. George Tucker where he ("makes clear that the Framers relied upon Vattel’s definition above, not the common law concept concerning “subjects").
In other words, Barry (a/k/a Obama) would not be considered a "Natural Born Citizen" because he was born to a foreign father, and Barry himself inherited (by birthright) his foreign fathers foreign citizenship [assuming, of course, that Sr. was his legal father at birth]. No matter where he was born Barry, was born a subject to the crown of her majesty the Queen of England. The framers would never have considered someone with dual allegiance at birth to be considered a natural born citizen. It contradicts the very meaning of the term as known by them in 1787.
The fact they included Tucker is, IMHO, a very good sign since the SC has already accepted it as foundational law in another case.
Largely forgotten today, Tucker returned to some legal prominence last Term, when the majority in District of Columbia v. Heller cited his annotated Blackstone’s Commentaries as proof that the Second Amendment had originally been understood as an individual right to arms.
Northwestern University Law Review
Thanks for the update.
His precedent must not be allowed to stand.
You said it brother. Amen and amen.
Furthermore, I don't care WHICH party the candidate comes from:
* not the Republican Party;
* not the Democrat Party;
* not the Peace and Freedom Party;
* not the American Independent Party;
* not the Green Party;
* not the Libertarian Party;
* not even the Communist Party!
NOT ONE of the candidates from ANY party should be allowed to run for President unless they can absolutely prove natural born citizenship.
Joe Biden’s position as VP. He would not be able to serve due to Obama’s eligibility and fraud.
And Nancy Pelosi knowledge beforehand of the fraud being imposed. There are two different forms of eligibility to the states thus indicating she knew!
Wow, that was a GREAT summary! Thanks for putting me some knowledge (as they say on Ace of Spades, long story). I am hoping and praying this case goes somewhere. It sounds so promising, but the judges in this country just don’t seem interested in giving us a fair hearing.
Their stated intentions were at the proper time to step forward and offer their family’s records as supporting evidence in any Supreme Court cases challenging Obama’s eligibility.
I wonder about this latest event, and if it is a portent to an approaching flood of supporting documents.
Yes. I remember that as well.
Adams papers, Lee family papers to prove NBC in Constitution came from Vattel?
Its best that in 2012 , during the election, he is outed as a fraud, by the people, and sent packing by the people.
We dont want scotus to rule on this. We want 60 percent of the people demanding an American be elected president. We want him leaving out the back door, hiding his face in shame.
Joe Biden’s position as VP. He would not be able to serve due to Obama’s eligibility and fraud.
And Nancy Pelosi knowledge beforehand of the fraud being imposed. There are two different forms of eligibility to the states thus indicating she knew!
Indeed! That's why many are (rightfully) calling this a Constitutional crisis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.