Posted on 05/21/2010 3:45:57 AM PDT by markomalley
your lists might be interested in this.
This statement requires no further comment.
As well as how many other vices and sins?
Why am I not surprised.
Of course,this finding will be met with the usual “open-mind”....
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09a/feder_0311/index.html
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09a/feder_0311/index.html
“These data seem to indicate that the father also plays a crucial role in the sexual development of his daughter.”
NOOOOOOOOOOOO, men are important????????
Having Cher for a mother would make a woman want to turn male.
Didn’t God have this all figured out “In the begining” ?
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
//Didn’t God have this all figured out “In the beginning” ?//
I think *he* did and it is man who makes the wrong choices. There is more to be said there but I’ll leave it as it is.
Well, that explains why homosexuality is apparently increasing. However, it is not - they are just more vocal.
The 2000 U.S. Census Bureau found that homosexual couples constitute less than 1% of American households. However, American people at large estimate 20% percent, or 1 in 5, is homosexual.
*taken from the GALLUP poll website
http://www.gallup.com/poll/6961/what-percentage-population-gay.aspx
I think the perception is carefully fostered by the media. Watching television, a disproportionate number of the characters are either gay or minority compared to the general population. One of those remodeling shows my wife watches had one out of three 'couples' who were with their same-sex 'partner'.
The overall image (and remember, on TV, image is everything) is that the homosexuals were far more common.
It is all part of the redefining of social norms by perception. It was done with divorce in the '60s, has been done (effectively) with out-of-wedlock babies, just to name a couple of things.
Keep in mind that it is easier for the state to control a population which does not have a parent whose primary job is to raise the children, as parental input is limited and their time is taken up in putting food on the table.
Well said.
I have a real problem with this statement. I am adopted and so is my daughter. Neither of us has ever engaged in homosexual behavior.
women who never attended religious worship where more than three times likely to participate in homosexual relationships than women who attended weekly services.
That statement, on the other hand, makes sense. In fact it could be expanded to include just about any and all vices since women and men who are raised with religion, lack a moral compass.
I don't think that this is what is being said. I think, rather, that they are saying that it is a statistically higher incidence of that happening, not that anybody is assured that it will or will not happen one way or the other.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.