Skip to comments.
New robotic stealth fighter jet set to soar
Live Science via Yahoo News ^
| 5/14/2010
| Live Science via Yahoo News
Posted on 05/16/2010 7:21:33 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: sonofstrangelove
Game changer. Imagine 1000 of these in an airspace with this mission profile: “Kill all ground radar and all aircraft moving faster than 200 mph except B52s, B1s, and B2s.”
So much for the enemy’s air defenses. Bomb at will.
Scary stuff.
2
posted on
05/16/2010 7:31:26 PM PDT
by
piytar
(Ammo is hard to find! Bought some lately? Please share where at www.ammo-finder.com)
To: sonofstrangelove
Ya,,, but a F86 Sabre (with a pilot) could bring it down with little trouble. In fact, the F86 was faster.(ps, a F86 was a 1960 fighter jet)
But it will be effective against camel jockeys. (as would a F86 with a pilot) with a cost savings of millions. But, we have printing press's making money 24/7. Whats a few billion these days.
3
posted on
05/16/2010 7:35:14 PM PDT
by
2aberro
To: sonofstrangelove
4
posted on
05/16/2010 7:35:41 PM PDT
by
katana
(Part Neanderthal, and proud of it!)
To: katana
Beautiful looking aircraft - I wonder what that blue light is?
5
posted on
05/16/2010 7:38:50 PM PDT
by
Ken522
To: 2aberro
Yeah the F86 might be faster but the Phantom Ray can probably, I say probably because we dont know, out maneuver the F86 easily. With no human aboard the flight envelope can dramatically change. No red out or black out limits
6
posted on
05/16/2010 7:39:16 PM PDT
by
Syntyr
(Mace, Kirk, Thomson, Griffin, Scusa, Martin, Gallegos, Hart - Remember the fallen of Kamdesh)
To: 2aberro
Ya,,, but a F86 Sabre (with a pilot) could bring it down with little trouble. *If* he can make visual contact (radar won't see it) and *if* he doesn't get out-maneuvered (no pilot means it can pull more G's) and *if* he can get within gun range, because his missiles won't work (radar and IR aren't going to see anything).
7
posted on
05/16/2010 7:43:47 PM PDT
by
Campion
To: Syntyr
out maneuver the F86 easilySorry to disagree,, I bet maneuverability was the last thing on the designers list. That was my point. This RC airplane is a missle launching platform only. F86 would eat its lunch in a dog fight. My point was that an old aircraft with a pilot could take it out. Lord only knows what a High tech fighter would do to it.
8
posted on
05/16/2010 7:50:13 PM PDT
by
2aberro
To: Campion
*if* he can get within gun rangeF86 is faster,, quad 50's.... game over.
9
posted on
05/16/2010 7:51:58 PM PDT
by
2aberro
To: sonofstrangelove
Pilot endurance of g forces is somewhere around 9-10. Take out the pilot and you’ve got a plane that can really turn a corner
10
posted on
05/16/2010 7:55:58 PM PDT
by
lurk
To: sonofstrangelove
Wait wait - it was done with 0 contracts and 0 defense department funding - according to local TV in Dallas. If that is true then we are entering a new era.
11
posted on
05/16/2010 7:56:28 PM PDT
by
q_an_a
To: lurk
Pilot endurance of g forces is somewhere around 9-10. Take out the pilot and youve got a plane that can really turn a cornerno argument over that statement,, but the RC airplane still has to overcome high speed stalls, etc. I doubt dog fights were in its design parameters. Camel humpers don't have airplanes.
12
posted on
05/16/2010 8:00:10 PM PDT
by
2aberro
To: Ken522
“Beautiful looking aircraft - I wonder what that blue light is?”
Attention shoppers for a K-Mart Special.
13
posted on
05/16/2010 8:01:43 PM PDT
by
Kirkwood
To: 2aberro
“I bet maneuverability was the last thing on the designers list. “
Implement the evasive maneuver programming and the human pilot is left shaking his head.
14
posted on
05/16/2010 8:05:34 PM PDT
by
Kirkwood
To: 2aberro
F86 is faster,, quad 50's.... game over. Unless he sees the target, it won't matter.
15
posted on
05/16/2010 8:06:16 PM PDT
by
Campion
To: Campion
Unless he sees the target, it won't matteragreed,,, but all of the air battles of WWII were fought by sight alone. It can be done again.
16
posted on
05/16/2010 8:09:54 PM PDT
by
2aberro
To: Campion
17
posted on
05/16/2010 8:28:24 PM PDT
by
ak267
To: 2aberro
Not at 3:30 AM in the fog.
WWII dogfights were done in daylight until radar equipped planes arrived. Their radar would never see this.
These drones are to ensure the enemy never sleeps, not daylight dogfights... which just don’t happen anymore.
18
posted on
05/16/2010 8:30:33 PM PDT
by
UNGN
(I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
To: q_an_a
There is a thing called black budgets.
19
posted on
05/16/2010 8:58:00 PM PDT
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("You hit somebody with your fist and not with your fingers spread:-General Heinz Guderian)
To: piytar
"Game changer."Especially after SkyNet becomes self-aware.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
20
posted on
05/16/2010 9:25:24 PM PDT
by
wku man
(Who says conservatives don't rock? Go to www.myspace.com/rockfromtheright)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson