Posted on 05/15/2010 3:23:59 PM PDT by circumbendibus
PLease refer to post 228, it settles the question. I can’t copy it because it’s some kind of graphic that I can’t do.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2513818/posts?page=228#2228
Bushpilot1 found something quite interesting.
None so blind as he who does not want to see.
You’re scaring me.
In short, it is not a real newspaper. No birth announcements, obituaries, wedding announcements and the like. Those can be found in the R-J.
You only need one parent a U.S. citizen and birth on American soil to be a Native born(naturalized) citizen. Natural born citizenship ( Article 2) requires that both parents be U.S. citizens. A minor child can not lose citizenship by actions of the parents. Regardless obama at best(unlikely) is a native born citizen and thus ineligible to be President.
WELL SAID, AND WELCOME.
You must be dreaming if you ever think that today’s DNC have the same moral standard as RNC in Nixon’s days, it will never happen when you are dealing with rats!!!
Stanley was NOT old enough to do that???
Obama Sr. was a subject of the British crown. That would have made the Usurper a dual citizen at birth. Where in the Constitution does it guarantee that?
Stanley was NOT old enough to do that???
Title 8, Chapter 12, Subchapter III, Part I, Section 1401 of the US Code:
The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person
(A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or
(B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date;
As I just said Sr. was a subject of the British Crown. That would have made junior a dual citizen, Right?
Where in the Constitution does it say that you can be a dual citizen and president of the United States of America?
Thank you for coming to my defense.
People born on U.S. soil are not "naturalized," since they're citizens from birth. There's no reason for them to go through any naturalization process.
Obama Sr. was a subject of the British crown. That would have made the Usurper a dual citizen at birth. Where in the Constitution does it guarantee that?
The Constitution is mute on the issue of dual citizenship and there are no laws which endorse it or ban it.
What there is is “State Department guidance” on the issue:
“Dual Nationality:
The concept of dual nationality means that a person is a citizen of two countries at the same time. Each country has its own citizenship laws based on its own policy. Persons may have dual nationality by automatic operation of different laws rather than by choice. For example, a child born in a foreign country to U.S. citizen parents may be both a U.S. citizen and a citizen of the country of birth.
A U.S. citizen may acquire foreign citizenship by marriage, or a person naturalized as a U.S. citizen may not lose the citizenship of the country of birth. U.S. law does not mention dual nationality or require a person to choose one citizenship or another. Also, a person who is automatically granted another citizenship does not risk losing U.S. citizenship. However, a person who acquires a foreign citizenship by applying for it may lose U.S. citizenship. In order to lose U.S. citizenship, the law requires that the person must apply for the foreign citizenship voluntarily, by free choice, and with the intention to give up U.S. citizenship.
Intent can be shown by the person’s statements or conduct. The U.S. Government recognizes that dual nationality exists but does not encourage it as a matter of policy because of the problems it may cause. Claims of other countries on dual national U.S. citizens may conflict with U.S. law, and dual nationality may limit U.S. Government efforts to assist citizens abroad. The country where a dual national is located generally has a stronger claim to that person’s allegiance.
However, dual nationals owe allegiance to both the United States and the foreign country. They are required to obey the laws of both countries. Either country has the right to enforce its laws, particularly if the person later travels there.Most U.S. citizens, including dual nationals, must use a U.S. passport to enter and leave the United States. Dual nationals may also be required by the foreign country to use its passport to enter and leave that country. Use of the foreign passport does not endanger U.S. citizenship. Most countries permit a person to renounce or otherwise lose citizenship.
Information on losing foreign citizenship can be obtained from the foreign country’s embassy and consulates in the United States. Americans can renounce U.S. citizenship in the proper form at U.S. embassies and consulates abroad.”
None so blind as he who does not want to see.
I should have put your name in the box as well.
0bot toadies are just so predictable.
In short, it is not a real newspaper. No birth announcements, obituaries, wedding announcements and the like. Those can be found in the R-J.
*******
The Review Journal: Does it lists births?
If it does, do you know how these births come to be listed in the Review Journal?
Do they ONLY come directly from the hospital?
Do they ONLY come directly from a Las Vegas or Nevada government agency?
Can a person whose child was NOT born in a hospital walk into the newspaper office and ask the newspaper to list the birth of his child? Thanks.
No proof has been shown in a court of law as to the location of 0thugga’s birth.
Or even to any living breathing human beings other than the two clowns at Factcheck. Or so they claim.
All anyone has seen are images on the internet. Means nothing.
Therefore, if a naturalized citizen tries to run in ‘12, he/she will be refused a place on the ballot. If he/she sues as an injured party with standing, demanding that, all candidates MUST prove their US birth beyond doubt.
0bagger will have no problem showing his long form as others must show ORIGINAL BCs, right?
That’s precisely why he’ll not dare to run in ‘12, proving that the “nutty birthers” were right about their crazy theory. An aide could have put that theory to sleep in a matter of hours without 0b0z0 scarifying any golf time.
Obama’s original birth documents could be subpoenaed by the state Attorney General (who is also a Republican) but he seems to be on Obama’s side in all this. His name is Mark L. Bennett.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.