Posted on 05/12/2010 9:38:20 PM PDT by neverdem
If our policy is/was to invade every country with a despotic leader why did we quit?
Out of mutual respect?
I think we more used to. From Boston to California, countless savage tribes, and the Civil War. We were, once, a more revolutionary, idealistic, even physical country. Now, we are more managerial, less physical, more materialistic.
We used to be a nation of younger people, now our average age is older.
I don’t know if we have quit either. Maybe it is a case of so many enemies, so little time.
I wouldn’t mind if we had a Department of Thug Overthrow.
I can understand the Army not wanting to devolve into a colonial constabulary. And I get the nature of the Army being a engineering, mechanical, logistic force, and not a bunch of Harvard anthropologists.
But the strife, the oil, the choakpoints and most importantly the people( ultimate resource IMO ) are in the messy places.
Putting idealism aside, this is were the fastest market/economic growth could and has occurred.
In short I advocating for a more systemic, studied military intervention and support, a la El Salvador. I don’t accept the imperialist label laied at our interventions in the Caribbean, Central America and the Philippines.
Where would the American West be, or have become, with out hundreds of years of military intervention, politics, engineering and even war? I think that the military should more embrace that heritage. Of course that is built upon the notion of America being a force for good in the world, which as we all well know is not held by a small yet influential percentage of our population. ( I wish dueling would come back )
Those were the words of Pete Schoomaker, then chief of staff of the Army, to General David Petraeus, who at the time (2005) was commander of the Combined Arms Center at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. The context of Schoomaker's remarks was that the war in Iraq, which had been going on for more than two years, wasn't going well. The trajectory of events was, in fact, alarming. So Schoomaker tasked Petraeus, the leader of a group of intellectual-warriors in the Army, to rethink our counterinsurgency (COIN) strategy. The job was to determine the right overarching concepts and intellectual underpinnings of the war -- and then to put them into practice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.