Posted on 05/11/2010 5:29:32 PM PDT by marktwain
and what if it’s a black, illegal alien, liberal, gay Muslim carrying openly??? then what? I’ll tell u what! We don’t say ANYTHING....so as not to offend the black, liberal, gay, illegal Muslim....all groups we have to tiptoe around!
Good question . I wonder if they sell expensive clothing . I hope I don't see anybody walking with intent to spill bow hunters skunk scent on about $2,000.00 worth of tassel loafers and lawyer costumes . That could provoke a disruption .
If one can’t carry openly and one can’t carry concealed....then the judge is actually ruling that the Second Amendment doesn’t exist, isn’t he?
Lynn S. Adelman is an Article III federal judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Adelman joined the court in 1997 after being nominated by President Bill Clinton.
Early life
Adelman was a graduate of Shorewood High School in Shorewood which produced former US Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist. Adelman received a B.A. Degree from Princeton Univ and graduated cum laude in 1961. Adelman received a Juris Doctor degree from Columbia Law School and graduate cum laude in 1965. [1]
State Senate Career
Adelman was a former State Senator in Wisconsin's 28th State Senate District from 1977 to 1997 preceding the seat currently held by current State Senator Mary Lazich. Adelman served on the Wisconsin Senate Judiciary Committee for the majority of his Senate career along with serving on the alcohol and drug abuse and highway safety committees. [2]
Here is the link:
That is exactly the effect that anti-gun fanatics want, of course. But, Judge Aldeman, being an accomplished sophist, might say: No, of course not, because if you can possess a gun in your home, suitably locked up, with the ammunition separate, so as not to present a danger to any children, women, or minorities in the general area, you are freely exercising your second amendment rights. Those are not infringements, they are just commonsense safety measures.
At least in most states.
...You can get a fake anything, why not a law enforcement badge? That gives you the advantage of stopping anyone to rob them. Seems you are in a lose, lose situation, you can be shot be a legidimate police officer, or you can be murdered for your property by someone posing as a police officer...
Funny, that’s what Kagan seemed to say when she was taking about restricting freedom of speech to protect the government and society.
“It really DOESN’T MATTER if it’s disruptive, or causes fear, it’s legal and protected by the Bill of Rights.
The “fear” and “disruption” are caused by the guy who enters a store POINTING HIS WEAPON and shouting “ALRIGHT! EVERYBODY ON THE FLOOR! YOU! OPEN THE REGISTER AND EMPTY IT!!! NOW!!!
Is there any common sense left in this country?!
“Is there any common sense left in this country?!”
Not among “progressives”.
It is also what nice prosecutors will let nice people plea to , when charged with solicitation and or indecent exposure . When you sit through an arraignment calendar of 50 very uncomfortable looking men who all plea to disorderly , the same time , same day , same park ,same bat channel , it wasn't a gang fight .
Kagan has some statements in her history that strongly imply exactly that.
So, TRAIN the porkers!
>No reasonable person would dispute that walking into a retail store openly carrying a firearm is highly disruptive conduct which is virtually certain to create a disturbance.
Then I guess my open-carrying in restaurants & stores, which has never generated any disruption, makes it unreasonable for me to think that, given my past experiences, it wouldn’t cause a disruption.
>Well great now everyone can get a concealed weapons permit since open carry is disruptive and we have a Constitutional right to Bear Arms. Idiots
Actually, we should put that in the form of a resolution or bill and send it up to Congress with this ruling as supporting documentation.
After all, if Federal law trumps State and Federal law requires that people have the right to keep and bear arms and open-carry is disallowed because it is disruptive then every state MUST be a SHALL ISSUE state REGARDLESS of existing State/County/municipality laws.
>Seems you are in a lose, lose situation, you can be shot be a legidimate police officer, or you can be murdered for your property by someone posing as a police officer...
This is EXACTLY what the 4th and 5th amendments are supposed to prevent; especially the requirement for warrants.
...There is a thin line drawn, and I understand it, but, I don't want to be presumed guilty if I crossed that line and didn't see the line...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.