Posted on 04/27/2010 10:31:22 AM PDT by rxsid
Ping and Let’s go.
Yes....I think so
Rev Manning himself calls obama a “long legged mack daddy”
That would be a bold move by Israel.
At this point, I am not sure what they would have to lose by making it.
Maybe it would keep Iran from doing the same since Iran would never want to follow in Israel’s footsteps.
“I still think there is a possibility of blackmail...”
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Very likely it is that you are right. I just think it will have to do with any one of a number of other things besides his not being a natural born citizen.
It sounds potentially explosive. I hope there is no violence directed at the people headed to Harlem to put the first ‘black’ president ‘on trial’. This could be the catalyst that Obama is going to try and exploit. I don’t feel that it will come from the side trying to expose Obama, but it would be easy for Obama to have some goons there to light the spark. I applaud Dr. Manning for his efforts though, just worry about his choice of venues.
I can offer a few insights into your dream if you don’t mind. I found it fascinating.
Most people in our dreams are some aspect of ourselves (our unconsious). Your dream is a manifestation of your own ‘righteous anger’(the preacher) and the dream also has an aspect of the ‘collective unconscious’..hence the setting of the ‘mega church’ with lots of people. By ‘collective unconscious’, your dream is tapping into the ‘collective’ i.e. the growing anger of many people at this President,his leftist policies, lies and broken promises. The fact that in the dream, ‘the preacher’(your righteous anger) seems ‘oblivious’ to the ‘huge congregaton’ might be a representation that you are becoming more and more comfortable with facing the reality of your right to be angry. ‘The liberals’ in the dream represent some aspects of your unconscious that seek to ‘deceive’ you about what is really going on. It could be the tendency we all have to ‘minimize’ what is going on...like...’can this really be happening in our country?’...’Is Obama REALLY a marxist’? It’s the part of us that doesn’t want to truly face reality.
Just a few thoughts. Only you can truly ‘interpret’ your own dream. Hope you didn’t mind me sharing a few thoughts on the symbols.
I’m going to freepmail some names to you and they may have other names. I’m freepmailing them so you can do the official pingifying of them.
http://www.youtube.com/user/ATLAHWorldwide#p/u/1/q_U6Z_P2gIU
It's not just his money or campaign money.
Obama WASTED the resources of the Department of Justice and sent out U.S. attorneys to courts around the nation, all in an effort to block the release of **common** documents.
Obama WASTED the time of U.S. attorneys and Department of Justice resources at a time when they should have been going after the bad guys who were laying plots to KILL our soldiers on their bases and recruitment centers and blow planes out of the sky.
If Obama WASTED citizen tax dollars, DOJ resources, and U.S. attorney time in an effort to play the game of “gotcha” on the birthers, I don't think Americans will be amused.
No, I think the white side of him will be on trial.
Would you legal eagles please take one moment to read the post at the link below? Am I showing my ignorance or is there any merit to the idea?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2501537/posts?page=94#94
Thanks!
LOL...true, but that doesn’t mean that the Obama goon squads are going to let it unfold that way. They may try to use it to stir up real trouble. I am glad Manning is going to do it though. Let it unfold. Something’s got to give and soon, before our country is destroyed.
Legally, this isn't going to have a direct impact.
The documents he puts in evidence may be worth a lot to the lawyer who ultimately gets to the effective legal proceeding (if ever). But at this point, I think most of us know what is available.
The real impact if any will be on the media. They will try to avoid him. They may get away with it; they may not. He has thought about it and recognizes what the objective of his effort is. He is the ultimate manager--I am not inclined to look at the racial implications but here is an outstanding American citizen who isn't likely to be accused of pursuing a racial agenda.
If anyone were able to get to the documents he uses, that might be helpful. The key things are the two live Kenya birth certificates that we know about. And affidavits about where they came from and how they got here. He isn't going to have the originals but they exist and Orly knows where they are.
David -
What I had actually asked you was to respond specifically to my post which I will paste in here:
I’m no constitutional lawyer but while reading the threads on the states’ filings against the health care bill, I noted that Florida and Virginia filed IIRC in a circuit court and expected the case to get bumped to the Supreme Court. I believe a circuit court can pass on a case if they choose and pass it up to the next level. At any rate, a case filed by a state HAS to be taken by SCOTUS, according to the articles I read. So I thought, why not an eligibility case? If EVERY case brought by a state has to be taken, then the states would automatically get standing. A lawyer should check this theory out since I picked up the notion from several articles written by journalists who may or may not have had their facts correct.
_______________________________________________
Is this out to lunch or true?
Thanks.
This guy is nuttier than Taitz. His wild claim that he’s subpoenaed George Stephanopoulos, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Condolezza Rice is just laughable. He doesn’t have the authority to subpoena anyone, and the sold called “trials” he’s holding at his church are impotent at best, and illegal at worst.
"THE MOTION OF BILL ANDERSON FOR LEAVE TO FILE A BRIEF A AMICUS CURIAE IS GRANTED. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CENTIORARI BEFORE JUDGEMENT IS DENIED. "
"Before Judgement." SCOTUS would not consider the case unless (back in January 2009) the lower courts first adjudicated it first; Berg did skip the 3rd Court of Appeals.
More Coffeeeeee... :-0
Thanks for the answer but the key here is the answer to the question of the states status with the Supreme Court. Does the SC have to take a case, no matter what it is, filed by a state? Not from a citizen, from a state?
I think they can refuse to hear any case if they choose.
Or hear any case when 4 of the SCOTUS members vote yes to do so.
"The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make."
An article on THE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT,
"The backlash of state sovereignty sentiment resulted in the proposal and ratification of the Eleventh Amendment, which did not, however, affect the direct flow of original jurisdiction to the Court, although those cases to which States were parties were now limited to States as party plaintiffs, to two or more States disputing, or to United States suits against States.1085"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.