Posted on 04/24/2010 9:18:51 PM PDT by cycle of discernment
Do we have another judge trying to protect the dirty @ss of Obama:
“History is replete with cases in which presidents have been subpoenaed or have provided evidence in federal cases,” the motion said, followed by a list of presidents who had been deposed or testified in civil or criminal cases.
Miller cited a U.S. Supreme Court ruling from Paula Jones’ case against then-president Bill Clinton. In that opinion, justices stated, “the president, like other officials, is subject to the same laws that apply to all citizens.”
Miller said that ultimately, it will be up to the judge to decide whether the president must provide testimony in the Blagojevich case.”
Chicago-Gate!
Explosive allegations in the motion filed by Blago’s attorneys, including:
1. Obama lied to FBI regarding no involvement in picking his successor
and
2. Rezko admitted to FBI agents he gave CASH to Obama.
Blago’s attorneys have been trying to get copies of the FBI/Obama interview tapes but have been denied access so far.
disturbing about drudge....
What, are you one of those bitter, bible clinging, gun totters?
Or we can just go to this page... http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/blago/index?tab=articles
The msm is going to avoid this case at all costs. It could be very harmful to Obama.
Scroll to 3:15:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5c5Cspu1KnE
Blago, the union connection (Stern?), and phone records contradict Obama’s statement here.
is this what he told the FBI??
My point is that there appears to be very little “noise” in the media about this earth shaking revelation —that there may well be proof that Obama directly lied and it recorded in court documents.
We all knew this here at Freerepublic, because we saw the news articles about Obama meeting with Blago to discuss his senate seat—those news articles were scrubbed from the web, fortunately some freepers have archived the images.
THIS situation, on the other hand is in full context of the court, it was leaked to the media, and certain news outlets—like CBS Chicago, Fox, Drudge etc covered it—and now SILENCE.
Drudge does not take down big news in 24 hours.
Why has he?
You mean like me?
Made and wore this all summer before the election - getting warm here again - I think I'll get it ready for the summer. Love to irritate the libs
Cripes, what did you do now?
AND, that’s Why the Media appear to be scared to death to say too much! Obama has too many fish in too many ponds as it is and he’s Powerful, so... Yeah, It IS scary!!! This man wants to Rule the World!
“Drudge does not take down big news in 24 hours.
Why has he?”>P?
Ummmmm, let me take a wild guess...he and his extended family were threatened by Obo’s evil super-rich satanic overlords??
Extremely disturbing. If this had been Bush, I guarantee you that they would have been investigating and talking about it non-stop everywhere. Drudge greatly disturbs me. Is the coup complete?
Of all the obligations that may be placed upon any of us in an ordered society , the duty of a judge to ensure a fair trial to the accused , is among the most solemn .
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2146114/posts
News stories covering Obama meeting with Blago re the Senate disappeared. Some FReepers tracked them down (cache?). That’s a link to one that directly contradicts Obama’s statement (see the youtube link) and, according to Blago’s recent motion, what Obama told the FBI.
Lying to the FBI, regardless if the underlying act would be a crime or not, IS a crime. Ask Martha Stewart.
Screen shot about the meeting posted here:
(scroll down a bit on the page)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2146114/posts?q=1&;page=151
Michelle Obama is mentioned in FBI affidavit. Blago attempts to get his wife appointed to boards like Michelle was:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.