Skip to comments.
Cornyn: Openly gay SCOTUS nominee might be acceptable
The Hill ^
Posted on 04/12/2010 4:42:51 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?
To: Sub-Driver
Well we already had Souter and now Sotamayer, so whats another queer on the court...
2
posted on
04/12/2010 4:44:41 PM PDT
by
apillar
To: Sub-Driver
Only a complete idiot would say that he would never consent to an openly gay nominee. You’ve got to hit these people on their ideology, or you lose. It’s as simple as that.
3
posted on
04/12/2010 4:44:54 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: Sub-Driver
Why is this man in the Senate?
4
posted on
04/12/2010 4:44:54 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Entitlement Zombies will become real zombies when the money runs out)
To: Sub-Driver
Why just gay? Why not be naked under the robe and bring a vibrator into the court and this superhomojustice can pleasure himself vs. actually interpret the law. This is what is becoming “normal” in this country, folks.
To: Sub-Driver
Democrat SCOTUS nominees: Republicans make nice and bend over
Republican SCOTUS nominees: Democrats malign them and go all out to defeat them
6
posted on
04/12/2010 4:45:50 PM PDT
by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
(Obamunism: You have two cows. The regime redistributes them and shoots you dead)
To: GeronL
Because he is a spineless weasel?
7
posted on
04/12/2010 4:46:03 PM PDT
by
Osage Orange
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: Sub-Driver; Bender2; cleveland gop; Richard Kimball; Lil'freeper
Oh roll me over and have your way with me.
Such good news.
8
posted on
04/12/2010 4:46:14 PM PDT
by
big'ol_freeper
("Anyone pushing Romney must love socialism...Piss on Romney and his enablers!!" ~ Jim Robinson)
To: Sub-Driver
What’s the point of having no litmus tests? In that case, why vote at all?
9
posted on
04/12/2010 4:46:21 PM PDT
by
Sloth
(Civil disobedience? I'm afraid only the uncivil kind is going to cut it this time.)
To: Sub-Driver
Maybe. Good luck finding one who believes in the constitution.
10
posted on
04/12/2010 4:46:50 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: Sub-Driver
What a knothead...Cornyn.
Send him back to the mesquite thicket.
11
posted on
04/12/2010 4:46:59 PM PDT
by
pointsal
To: Sub-Driver
That’s IT, Cornyn has to go
12
posted on
04/12/2010 4:47:24 PM PDT
by
gidget7
("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
To: Brilliant
Very true.
I could support an openly homosexual conservative on the court, as long as they were a true ‘originalist’, which would be a very rare find I must say. lol
13
posted on
04/12/2010 4:47:36 PM PDT
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: Sub-Driver
Why not ... It could lead to some really interesting SC tickle fights.
So we get a dodomayor and a openly gay cruising the court for ...
And what about their judicial temperance? Will everything be judged on it’s gayness form now on?
All Obama wants is his freak show to vote his way ... Not follow the Constitution.
New SC choosing rules, red, green, blue, pink, purple, let’s just color code the SC.
14
posted on
04/12/2010 4:48:22 PM PDT
by
Tarpon
( ...Rude crude socialist Obama depends on ignorance to force his will on people)
To: Sub-Driver
You dress men in robes and you're asking for it.
We could dress them like Canada's Supreme Court.
Then they'd be able to pick up some extra money around the holidays.
15
posted on
04/12/2010 4:49:11 PM PDT
by
x
To: Sub-Driver
Is that a rolled Constitution in your pocket, or are you just glad to see me?
16
posted on
04/12/2010 4:51:05 PM PDT
by
SGCOS
To: GeronL
Cornyn said (last week) that pelosi is a nice lady.
Good grief - the future keeps looking bleaker with these pols on our team.
17
posted on
04/12/2010 4:51:19 PM PDT
by
newfreep
(Palin/DeMint 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
To: Sub-Driver
Obama’s going to nominate Barney Frank for the Supreme Court?
18
posted on
04/12/2010 4:52:11 PM PDT
by
HighlyOpinionated
(SPEAK UP REPUBLICANS, WE CAN'T HEAR YOU YET! IMPEACH OBAMA!)
To: Sub-Driver
“Openly gay SCOTUS nominee might be acceptable”
Not no, BUT HELL NO!!!!
To: Sub-Driver
“Asked if he had any litmus tests...”
***
WHO was doing all the “asking” that is part of the subject of this column?
These questions are landmines.
20
posted on
04/12/2010 4:53:21 PM PDT
by
Canedawg
(I'm not digging this tyranny thing.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson