Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Steele Says He and Obama Have Slimmer Margins of Error Because They Are African-American
ABC News ^ | 04/05/2010 | By HUMA KHAN, JONATHAN KARL and POLSON KANNETH

Posted on 04/05/2010 5:22:40 AM PDT by iowamark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: iowamark
The major reason Steele is facing a slimmer margin of error competence is that he's a nominal leader when a real leader is required, and there is not a real Republican Leader in sight. He's probably not that much less competent than a lot of RNC leaders we've had in the past. The job doesn't seem to attract competence, unfortunately.
61 posted on 04/05/2010 6:07:12 AM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

You have a black or Hispanic candidate you can replace him with?

I honestly think replacing him with Blackwell is a mistake. Blackwell is more than confident but he has to blame Steele for ruining that idea. Picking Blackwell after Steele will make it look like playing politics more than nothing else and Blackwell will simply not have credibility.

Pick a non-Hispanic white chair and that creates bad publicity too. The way to go is probably with a Hispanic-American chairman. There are plenty of Hispanic Republicans in Texas and Florida. If you picked a Hispanic chair you would actually be going after a voter demographic we could get and it won’t be as transparent as picking Blackwell.


62 posted on 04/05/2010 6:18:45 AM PDT by AzaleaCity5691
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

“Michael Steele Says He and Obama Have Slimmer Margins of Error Because They Are African-American”

NOT!!!! Same that s^%$ for the street!


63 posted on 04/05/2010 6:35:06 AM PDT by SMARTY ("What luck for rulers that men do not think. " Adolph Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

This is the last straw. I believe, if anything, Steele has been given breaks after his numerouus gaffes and questionable expenditures, becasue the GOP doesn’t want the bad publicity from firing the first black party chairman.


64 posted on 04/05/2010 6:35:08 AM PDT by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Uh, no, Mikey, you and Bammi have been given way more leeway because you’re African-American. Any white man with your level of incompetence would have been gone a long time ago.


65 posted on 04/05/2010 6:53:53 AM PDT by MIlle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Steele travels around in the style of Imelda Marcos and that is bad, BUT playing the race card is far worse. I suppose the GOP thought they had to get a Black guy to counter balance Obama, but it is more important to have an effective leader.


66 posted on 04/05/2010 7:00:22 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Slimmer margins of error than who, Bush? Karl Rove? Everyone was nice to them because they were white. /s


67 posted on 04/05/2010 7:02:46 AM PDT by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AzaleaCity5691
You have a black or Hispanic candidate you can replace him with? I honestly think replacing him with Blackwell is a mistake. Blackwell is more than confident but he has to blame Steele for ruining that idea. Picking Blackwell after Steele will make it look like playing politics more than nothing else and Blackwell will simply not have credibility. Pick a non-Hispanic white chair and that creates bad publicity too. The way to go is probably with a Hispanic-American chairman. There are plenty of Hispanic Republicans in Texas and Florida. If you picked a Hispanic chair you would actually be going after a voter demographic we could get and it won’t be as transparent as picking Blackwell.

How about we just dump the frickin' racial politics and put the best person for the job into the position. What a concept: Imagine, hiring someone because they are competent not because they are of a particular race or ethnicity!

68 posted on 04/05/2010 7:06:53 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
...$17,000 for private jet travel, $13,000 for limousines and car services...

Has anyone cross-referenced the dates that these expenses were incurred with Steele's book-signing itinerary?

69 posted on 04/05/2010 7:21:22 AM PDT by Charles Martel ("Endeavor to persevere...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Well the time to do that was when Steele was up for Chairman but no one wanted to have that. Everyone wanted to talk about Abraham Lincoln and about how having a black guy to rebut Obama would be such a good thing.

Well, now you’ve gone down the road of racial politics. You have to follow up on that road and that road says this. We’re never going to get the black vote. The election of Obama ensures that.

We might be able to get the Hispanic vote and Hispanics have shown in various opinion surveys that they think like white voters and will probably be considered white in their own right in a few generations.

Consider that after the Dems nominated Al Smith that there was a mass defection of Catholic Republicans to the Democrats and that Catholics stayed predominantly Democratic until the age of Reagan. You may say ethnic politics has no place but you’re a fool if you think it isn’t present in our own party.

All Cubans in South Florida are Republican. It’s for two reasons. The first was that the Southern Democrats that ran Florida at the time had no desire to accomodate a Spanish speaking population. The other was that Kennedy muffed the Bay of Pigs. Republicans reached out to them on racial appeals they bit. Without them, Florida would have never had Republican control. Marco Rubio is a product of that system.


70 posted on 04/05/2010 7:23:42 AM PDT by AzaleaCity5691
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I don’t base judgement on the religion, sex, or race of a person... I base judgement on their accomplishments and how they conduct themselves.

Mr. Steele is a failure. Enough said.


71 posted on 04/05/2010 7:26:57 AM PDT by BCR #226 (07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
No, sorry, Steele. You, I agree, do have a slimmer margin of error because liberals/democrats are always looking for any slips on your part so that they can call you an oreo, or an uncle tom. Obama, however, has a margin of error broader than a ten-lane interstate highway. GWB had a smaller margin of error than Obastard does, by several orders of magnitude.

Obama
72 posted on 04/05/2010 7:30:38 AM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

I don’t think it’s raising the bar so much as simply beginning to recognize that some will conclude that it may not be worth hasseling with normal and legitimate concerns about leadership, conduct, judgment and so on if we’re all on notice that, at the first hint of consternation, out comes the race — or some other irrelevant personal trait — card.

It was Rush or David Horowitz, IIRC, who said as to Obambi, for example, “America will not stand for a president they are not ‘allowed’ to criticize.”

At some point, that becomes the bottom line. If it becomes impossible, impracticable, or overly complicated with PC-ness to simply judge someone’s conduct or performance in a position, then people likely to cause that over-complication become less favored as candidates for the job.

No one wants to hire someone who won’t take personal responsibility for his conduct or job performance, much less someone who will turn around and blame someone or something else for the fact that those who hired him are dissatisfied with his conduct or job performance.


73 posted on 04/05/2010 7:49:53 AM PDT by fightinJAG (Next up: Forced public transportation:because it's not "affordable" unless we all have to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I thought Michael Steele was smarter and more trustworthy than this. He knows very well that using the race card to deflect personal responsibility or avoid a discussion of the merits of the criticism is not appropriate.


74 posted on 04/05/2010 7:52:06 AM PDT by fightinJAG (Next up: Forced public transportation:because it's not "affordable" unless we all have to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: gthog61

Good point. Never looked at racism from that angle. Obummer has ruined any black’s potential for achieving really high office for a long time in the future. Maybe Obummer will go down not so much as “the first black President”, but as the last black President for a really long, long time. As for Michael Steele, he turned out to be really disappointing, we needed a lion and we got a pussy, and now he’s using the race card...sigh.


76 posted on 04/05/2010 8:14:35 AM PDT by kiltie65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

The pre-paid RNC money grubbing solicitation envelopes make lovely payment envelopes for contribtions to JD Hayworth.


77 posted on 04/05/2010 8:19:24 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( FIRE STUPAK: LindaForCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Playing race cards to survive.. How special.


78 posted on 04/05/2010 10:19:12 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Chuck DeVore - CA Senator. Believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Playing the victim will get you nowhere within the GOP. Time to go, Michael.


79 posted on 04/05/2010 11:51:47 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

Unbelivable! Just kick him out!


80 posted on 04/05/2010 12:08:31 PM PDT by concernedforusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson