Posted on 03/31/2010 5:02:18 AM PDT by Kaslin
Seems like a more important question would be: are they true ?
Actually, no. That would be my description of Hillary, I think. I had a discussion with someone during the primaries and when Rush was screwing around with them, and I told someone I wanted no part of the game. I remember thinking Hillary would be a better "leader" of the two, if only because the damage she would do to this country would be by design, whereas 0bama's would be from mistakes (and partially by design).
Was Karl Marx EVIL or just MISTAKEN?
Was Lenin EVIL or just MISTAKEN?
They both Belived that there was GROSS INJUSTCE (on their definition) in the WORLD. They also believed that THIS WORLD was all there was and eliminating INJUSTICE was the MOST important thing to do and EVERYTHING done to bring this about was JUSTIFIED!!
Hitler BELIEVED this TOO! Doesn’t a sympathetic read of DARWIN suggest that Hitler is /was RIGHT!!
Both, of course BELIEVED “the end JUSTIFIES the MEANS!!”
Sadly, Medved is correct. The vast majority of people are incapable of facing the truth: Obama is a Communist, and he and his entire New Left administration are bent on destroying the United States, because he hates God, white people, and freedom.
Most people have to have things sugar-coated: Obama is just a liberal. He’s in over his head. He means well, but he’s too much of an idealist.
Evil....maybe not.Ruthless and cunning...definatly.
Okay. He’s evil. And you’re friggin’ nuts. Get your finger off the Caps Lock key and talk like a human being. Actually, talk to someone else, because I’m out of this discussion.
meant to type softballing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.