Posted on 03/25/2010 9:14:21 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
McCain lost because he was a crappy candidate.
When conservatives stop accepting the best candidate that is presented to them and start demanding candidates who don’t compromise on principles is when conservatives will gain and retain power. That’s been proven time and time again.
Maybe a Heyworth could win if we would stop accepting compromise. Sometimes its not good enough to do your best, you have to do what’s required.
I wonder what your liberal explanation is for Palin contributing to Lindsey Grahamnesty....
You gotta keep up on these threads..., or else you would already know. She was paying back startup money (discussed on another thread, doncha know...).
I have heard that somewhere before, oh now I remember thats how we got SwartzenKennedy.
Exactly
McCain lost because he was a crappy candidate.
When conservatives stop accepting the best candidate that is presented to them and start demanding candidates who don’t compromise on principles is when conservatives will gain and retain power. That’s been proven time and time again.
Maybe a Heyworth could win if we would stop accepting compromise. Sometimes its not good enough to do your best, you have to do what’s required.
Have you noticed they ignored my comment completely. If this isn’t tacit consent I don’t know what is.
Did you ever ask why Palin's brand new PAC would be giving Graham money only months after the 2008 election and when he would not be campaigning again for many, many years? She was paying him back for his donation that was part of the process of activating her new PAC.
That’s easy... I voted for the very same guy that Palin is campaigning for now, for President of the United States (and not for just one measley “state”). I figure if I can vote for him for being President of all the States in the United States, she can campaign for him for one measely state... doncha know... LOL ...
And having said that, Palin is pushing it right to the edge with me on this one...
I am convinced English is not the poster’s first language.
Maybe they ignored your comment because it was idiotic.
He opposed the Bush tax cuts.
He opposed the marriage amendment.
He opposed the terror bill.
He opposed drilling in ANWR
And to add (on McCain)
He supports closing GITMO
He takes money from George Soros
He was the only GOP involved w Charles Keating
He supports Open Borders/Illegal Alien Amnesty
Lindsey Graham is his Mini-Me
Sometimes, they just can’t answer without a telepromter.
Why are you confusing him with the facts. Invalid fact seem to be working just fine for some./s
So basically, you voted for a liberal?
Wake up Sarah. This man did everything in his power to destroy you politically.
Oh..., those were the "Romney-bots" that were in the campaign, after McCain knocked out Romney. There were there to make sure Romney could run again, as soon as possible, doncha know.
They were just as much a problem and a hassle for McCain then, as the Romney-bots are a problem now, for Free Republic.
Just look at the Romney-ites and Paul-ites right here on Free Republic and how they try to destroy Palin politically -- that's what McCain had to contend with, too... doncha know... LOL ...
Based on what you quoted, it’s all past tense.
LOL. But you didn’t.
Do you think that Sarah’s support of McCain might cost Hayworth some votes?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.