Posted on 03/24/2010 11:09:55 AM PDT by smoothsailing
Nice thought. But just a thought, I’m afraid.
You know the fact that there is no railroading .
Russel is a sore loser and peddling a pack of lies to prevent Burns from becoming the incumbent in the upcoming midterm elections.
Exactly...Bill Russell faced Murtha when no one else would. He’s done his homework, built a campsign base and Gleason pulls the rug out from under him.
Typical of Gleason after not supporting Diana Irey or Bill Russell in prior elections against Murtha.
Why are you trolling Russell threads for Burns votes?
Yesterday morning you didn’t even know Russell’s name.
This is not the truth
Russel is sad pathetic SORE LOSER .
Burns is a local tea party activist, a conservative ,and a true PA local.
Burns won the local special election delegate vote by a hundreds of people .That is PA state law for special elections .
No one has a full blown primary for special elections since its a huge taxpayer expense.
Russel needs to stand down and divide the vote on purpose !
I would love to see Irey jump back in. She was very popular on FR, unfortunately, that campaign took a big financial toll on her.
I am not spreading lies and propaganda about Burns .
I am just making sure the Russel smear strategy is
shut down .
Its a disgrace.
Which tea party groups does Burns represent/work with?
Also, you said Burns won by “..a hundreds...”
Was it “a hundred” or “hundreds”?
Yes, I liked Irey a lot also. She was on Quinn and Rose’s show a lot back then. I think she knew Rose somehow. I take exception to smoothsailings characterization as Bill Russell being the only one to ever take on Murtha. Irey ran a tough campaign against him and didn’t let up on any punches. I don’t want to disparage Russell. I like him. But right now he is being selfish and needs to just run for the primary win and quit whining about the process to take the rest of Murtha’s term.
The vote was Burns 85 to Russell's 46.
Here's a post of yours from yesterday morning.
Because this Russert LOST BEFORE and never Lived in the district and ran a crummy campaign.
Russert needs to grow up and move on.
15 posted on Tuesday, March 23, 2010 5:14:40 AM by ncalburt (e)
Who are you talking about, Tim Russert? He's dead, Jim.
One other thing, it seems to me that Russell is trying to make out that this is like the Hoffman/Scozzafava situation up in New York. It is nothing like it. He has a chance to run in the primary just like everyone else. The state was not going to have a special election so close to the regular primary. That would have been a waste of money and there would not have been a good turnout anyways.
>> I am just making sure the Russel smear strategy is shut down .
Dude, get lost.
I'm surprised this should be such a controversy. It seems that party rules should be clear as to when to call a special election. For example, in New Mexico, you have to get above 20% of a vote like this to be on a ballot, if only one person gets above 20%, a special election is not needed unless the other party can get a certain amount of signatures. If the rules are similar it seems Russell has a very strong case here.
Done!!
Yes, I don’t know all the rules in PA on special elections, I live in WA. Smoothsailing is up on this and was at the meeting where the conferees voted.
There was a hit piece against Russell yesterday and it sounds like it started a lot of rumors against him.
Russell has a legitimate gripe with PA Republicans, especially Rob Gleason, IMO. But Russell is running in the primary against Burns and I believe will beat Burns.
Actually Col. Russell wished Burns luck in the special election. And that’s a fact. He half-joking said he might wtite himself in at a town hall meeting in Indiana, PA, both he and Burns were there and the crowd laughed. He also said he’d vote for Burns should Burns be on the ballot in November.
Alot of the reporting on this has been taken out of context, or in some cases distorted by partisan commenters.
I volunteered for Diana’s campaign, I live in the district. Both Irey and Russell ran virtually unopposed in their respective primaries. There has not been a competitive Republican primary in the 12th CD in years.
You say Russell is being selfish, I say Russell is being honest and courageous. And guess what, Gleason created the situation the Republican party here finds itself in, not Russell. Russell just wants clean politics and honest party officials.
So do I.
Here we go. Murtha’s rigormortis has barely set in and we’ve got the Chiefs leaving town and Republicans fighting with each other.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.