Skip to comments.
Sec.Service Warns Public That They'd Confiscate Any Cameras Used to Take Pictures of First Family
JonathonTurley.org ^
| 03/22/10
| Jonathon Turley
Posted on 03/22/2010 1:14:50 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-168 next last
To: swarthyguy
Show me where in that hallowed document, you have the right to take pictures with your cell fone.First amendment. And what is a fone?
121
posted on
03/22/2010 3:09:56 PM PDT
by
meyer
(It's time...)
To: OldDeckHand; pabianice
To: OldDeckHand
My guess is they do not want to caught out socializing with Bill Ayers or Rev. Wright.
123
posted on
03/22/2010 3:17:51 PM PDT
by
taildragger
(Palin/Mulally 2012)
To: OldDeckHand
This is a conspiracy to deny civil rights under color of law, and it is a felony.
124
posted on
03/22/2010 3:18:27 PM PDT
by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: OldDeckHand
Michelle was having a bad hair day. A bad Wookie hair day
125
posted on
03/22/2010 3:20:26 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
To: Triple
New York Post reported on August 12, 2009 the Secret Service "temporarily" confiscated cellphones at a burger joint Michelle went to:
Page Six
To: OldDeckHand
Michelle doesn’t want anyone taking pictures of her butt.
127
posted on
03/22/2010 3:31:49 PM PDT
by
TheThinker
(Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenerio at a time.)
To: Brugmansian
"I read it on FR!...lol..." I think there one more instance, in addition to the one at the burger joint you mentioned. I think the SS confiscated cell phones at a restaurant (a nice restaurant) either in DC, or during Barry's date-night to NYC a while back.
It seems to be a pattern of behavior.
128
posted on
03/22/2010 3:36:30 PM PDT
by
OldDeckHand
(USA - b. July 4, 1776 / d. March 21, 2010)
To: OldDeckHand
She takes a horrible photograph and she’s using the power of the executive branch to stop more unflattering photos from appearing in public. That’s the bottom line to this. It’s not about her kids.
To: OldDeckHand
Who the hell wants a picture of the fat as* ugly woman anyway.... or the rug rats.
130
posted on
03/22/2010 4:16:46 PM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(Go ahead, pass it you bastards, I will NEVER comply in any way. Read my lips, NEVER!)
To: CarolinaGOP
For the cover of National Geographic........
131
posted on
03/22/2010 4:25:44 PM PDT
by
Quickgun
(As a former fetus, I'm opposed to abortion. Mamas don't let your cowboys grow up to be babies..)
To: OldDeckHand
They are just trying to make up for all the times they got jacked for their phones, firearms, wallets, radios, dataz, dox etc. ;)
To: Nachum
Have you rethought that since?
133
posted on
03/22/2010 4:31:32 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: knarf
134
posted on
03/22/2010 4:33:28 PM PDT
by
Quickgun
(As a former fetus, I'm opposed to abortion. Mamas don't let your cowboys grow up to be babies..)
To: happinesswithoutpeace
Imagine that. Are we to guess that the children have not been on Michelle's healthy diet - or what?
Please; they are still public servants. . .an aspect of WH employment that they NEVER consider, of course. Worse for Obama Edict; they are in a public place! Braodway is not a frickin private party!
The Media of course, will take it; suck it up and behave like the useful idiots they are.
Wish there was a photog brave enough to have his camera taken so as to make an 'incident'. These folks are sooo deserving!
Did they get a pic of entourage and traffic jam they caused? How did they enter. . .front door or side? Oh well, perhaps there is more to the story; just do not care to read it.
135
posted on
03/22/2010 4:38:28 PM PDT
by
cricket
To: bvw
Rethought? I think the Secret Service has a miserable job and has to put up with the whims of the people they protect. I don't like to beat up the security teams in charge of protecting our leaders.
Besides, I really don't care to see ANY pictures of her highhorseyness. :)
136
posted on
03/22/2010 4:45:42 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Nachum
Can I have my bodyguards confiscate your cellphone or any other device?
137
posted on
03/22/2010 4:54:33 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: bvw
bodyguards confiscate your cellphone or any other device? If you were the president's wife in a theater with her kids and my security thought it was a threat,- yes.
138
posted on
03/22/2010 4:58:34 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: OldDeckHand
Not my camera they’re not. That’s the virtue of really long zoom lenses! Effing fascists.
139
posted on
03/22/2010 4:59:43 PM PDT
by
Oceander
(The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
To: MestaMachine
well you do raise a good point....
140
posted on
03/22/2010 5:01:17 PM PDT
by
blueyon
(The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-168 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson